Lithuania - A LygaData current as of September 06, 2026

Banga vs Panevėžys: match statistics

Banga crest
Banga
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Panevėžys crest
Panevėžys
165%(2.20)
X20%(3.20)
215%(2.87)

Banga demonstrates a clear advantage as the home side, winning 50% of their home matches and boasting an impressive goal difference of +4 while conceding just 0.5 goals per game at home. Panevėžys is in terrible away form – they have lost all away matches this season, conceding an average of 4 goals per game with a goal difference of -7. The difference in efficiency is huge: Banga scores an average of 2.5 goals per home game with a conversion rate of 22%, while Panevėžys manages only 0.5 goals per away game with a mere 8% conversion. xG statistics also confirm the home team's dominance (1.38 vs 0.88), and Panevėžys' recent away form (two consecutive defeats) further weakens their chances. Given such a clear disparity in form, especially in the context of home and away performances, a Banga victory is the most likely scenario.

Banga vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Banga played against Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Banga has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Panevėžys has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Banga scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 0.60. Panevėžys scores 0.80 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.41 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of Banga's games and 60% of Panevėžys's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 60%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Banga has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.25 per game. Banga takes 11.8 shots per game, while Panevėžys takes 10.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Banga leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Panevėžys leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Banga's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Panevėžys, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

A Lyga games average 2.41 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Banga demonstrates a clear advantage as the home side, winning 50% of their home matches and boasting an impressive goal difference of +4 while conceding just 0.5 goals per game at home. Panevėžys is in terrible away form – they have lost all away matches this season, conceding an average of 4 goals per game with a goal difference of -7. The difference in efficiency is huge: Banga scores an average of 2.5 goals per home game with a conversion rate of 22%, while Panevėžys manages only 0.5 goals per away game with a mere 8% conversion. xG statistics also confirm the home team's dominance (1.38 vs 0.88), and Panevėžys' recent away form (two consecutive defeats) further weakens their chances. Given such a clear disparity in form, especially in the context of home and away performances, a Banga victory is the most likely scenario.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
BangaPanevėžys
14Shots11
BangaPanevėžys
4Shots on target3
BangaPanevėžys
1.41xG1.17
BangaPanevėžys
5Corners1
BangaPanevėžys
34Dangerous attacks38
BangaPanevėžys
21Fouls11
BangaPanevėžys
3Cards4
BangaPanevėžys

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.4Goals scored / game0.8
BangaPanevėžys
0.6Goals allowed / game2
BangaPanevėžys
46%Average possession48%
BangaPanevėžys
3.8Shots on target / game4.2
BangaPanevėžys

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.8Shots per game10.8
BangaPanevėžys
3.8Shots on target4.2
BangaPanevėžys
11.9%Shot conversion7.4%
BangaPanevėžys
46%Possession48%
BangaPanevėžys
1.32xG for1.25
BangaPanevėžys
1.11xG against1.78
BangaPanevėžys

Shooting quality

Banga: BalancedPanevėžys: Balanced
BangaPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)32%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Banga is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Banga · 1 pts / game - Panevėžys

Banga
WLWLL
Season result split
40% W0% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Panevėžys
DLDLW
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banga is 75% better for: goals scored per game.

1.4 goals / game - Banga · 0.8 goals / game - Panevėžys

Banga is 233% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.6 goals / game - Banga · 2 goals / game - Panevėžys

Banga scoring profile: mixed

Banga scores in 40% of games (2 of 5 meczów), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).

Panevėžys scoring profile: mixed

Panevėžys scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 meczów).

7Goals scored (season)4
BangaPanevėžys
3Goals conceded (season)10
BangaPanevėžys
2Average goals per game2.8
BangaPanevėžys
7Goals scored (last 5)4
BangaPanevėžys
3Goals conceded (last 5)10
BangaPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal60%
BangaPanevėžys
40%2 goals20%
BangaPanevėžys
20%3 goals0%
BangaPanevėžys
20%4 goals0%
BangaPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
BangaPanevėžys
0%2 goals40%
BangaPanevėžys
0%3 goals40%
BangaPanevėžys
0%4 goals40%
BangaPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Scored in both halves0%
BangaPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
BangaPanevėžys
0%BTTS - last 560%
BangaPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
BangaPanevėžys
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
BangaPanevėžys
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
BangaPanevėžys

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / game - Banga · 1.6 pts / game - Panevėžys

Banga - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per game (1st half)1.6
BangaPanevėžys
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.8
BangaPanevėžys
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)1
BangaPanevėžys
1Average goals (1st half)1.8
BangaPanevėžys
80%Clean sheet before half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys
80%No goal before half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per game (2nd half)0.4
BangaPanevėžys
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0
BangaPanevėžys
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
BangaPanevėžys
1Average goals (2nd half)1
BangaPanevėžys
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
BangaPanevėžys
60%No goal after half-time100%
BangaPanevėžys

Banga - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Panevėžys - second-half results

0% W40% R60% P
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Banga - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Panevėžys - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.40
Goals scored / game0.80.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Banga
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
24%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Banga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
154%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

BangaLigaPanevėžys
Average goals per game 2.002.41 2.80
Both teams scored 0%44% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%41% 60%
Clean sheets 40%33% 20%
Goal before half-time 40%70% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%70% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / game
1.11
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BangaYellow cardDovydas Norvilas
  2. PanevėžysYellow cardLovro Grajfoner
  3. PanevėžysYellow cardOleksandr Kurtsev
  4. BangaYellow cardDeividas Malžinskas
  5. PanevėžysYellow cardKwadwo Asamoah
  6. BangaYellow cardKofi Fosuhene Asare
  7. PanevėžysGoalKwadwo Asamoah
  8. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Marko BačaninOff: Edvin Muratovic
  9. PanevėžysYellow cardOleksandr Kurtsev

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Banga's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss against Panevėžys. Games average 2.25 goals, and both teams scored in 75% of them.

FK Banga Gargždai
2 : 2
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
1 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 1
FK Banga Gargždai

FAQ

What was the result of Banga vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished Banga 0:1 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Banga and Panevėžys?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Banga won 0, Panevėžys won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Banga vs Panevėžys?

Banga score 1.40 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.80. The A Lyga average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Banga's matches and 60% of Panevėžys's.

What form are Banga and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games Banga have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Panevėžys 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banga vs Panevėžys?

The statistical background for Banga vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.