Banga vs Sūduva: match statistics
Banga vs Sūduva: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Banga played against Sūduva in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Banga has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Sūduva has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Banga scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.57. Sūduva scores 1.14 and allows 0.29. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Banga's games and 14% of Sūduva's. The Over 2.5 rates are 14% and 14%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sūduva has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.38 per game. Banga takes 12.7 shots per game, while Sūduva takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Banga leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Sūduva leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Banga's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Sūduva, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Banga holds a clear advantage in finishing and home-field strength: the hosts average 1.67 goals per home match, while Sūduva manages only 0.33 on the road. The efficiency gap is particularly evident in conversion rates — Banga converts about 14% of shots at home into goals versus Sūduva’s mere 3% away — despite similar shot volumes (12.33 vs 12.67) and shots on target (4.67 vs 4.00). Defensively the teams are comparable: both concede 0.67 goals per match on average, and xG indicates balanced quality of chances (Banga xG 1.39 at home vs Sūduva xG 1.44 away), pointing to a low-scoring affair. Recent form over five matches favors the visitors — Sūduva averages 1.6 points with a 2-2-1 record, while Banga has only 0.8 points and a 1-1-3 record — but the away side draws frequently on the road (67% draws). Taking into account Banga’s superior home efficiency (1.67 goals and 14% conversion) and Sūduva’s poor finishing away (0.33 goals and 3% conversion), I forecast a home win; probabilities estimated at 60% Banga, 25% draw and 15% Sūduva.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Banga at home has not conceded a goal this season (average 0.0 goals conceded per match), with 100% clean sheets and 0% BTTS matches at home, which is the strongest signal against Both Teams To Score. Sūduva away scores only 0.33 goals per match on average and has 33% clean sheets on the road, although in the last 5 matches they have averaged 1.6 goals, which provides only a limited adjustment. xG is similar (xG Banga 1.53 vs xG Sūduva 1.44), but Banga has a much better shot conversion 14% versus Sūduva's 3%, so any goals are most likely to be scored by the home side. Additionally, the league shows a low BTTS rate of 37% and a very high clean sheet rate of 80%, reinforcing the trend against both teams scoring. Considering Banga's 100% home clean sheets, Sūduva's 0.33 away goal average and their low away conversion of 3%, I assess BTTS probability at 15% vs 85% for No BTTS and recommend selecting “No” (No Goal / clean sheet expected).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Average xG indicates about 1.34 goals for Banga (xG attack 1.53 vs average xG conceded by Sūduva 1.14) and 1.29 for Sūduva (xG attack 1.44 vs average xG conceded by Banga 1.14), totaling 2.63 expected goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.63 yields ~74% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~49% chance of at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~27% chance of 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Both teams generate similar shot volumes (12.25 vs 12.67) and shots on target (3.75 vs 4.0), and over the last 5 matches Banga averaged 1.0 goal, Sūduva 1.6 (total 2.6), which supports a slight lean over 2.5 goals. On the other hand, seasonal rates show a low frequency of matches above 2.5 goals (Banga 25%, Sūduva 0%), which reduces confidence for the 2.5 and 3.5 lines. As a result the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (74% probability); therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics strongly favor Banga: the hosts score an average of 1.75 goals per match and have led at the break in 2 of 4 games (50%), with a first-half scoring average of 0.75 and 0.0 goals conceded at home by halftime. Sūduva away has a 0% win rate, averages 0.33 goals and concedes 0.67 per match, and its shot conversion rate is only 3%. The xG difference is small (1.53 versus 1.44), but Banga is far more efficient at finishing chances (conversion 14% versus 3%) and has 100% clean sheets at home, which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. Therefore the most likely scenario is Banga leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time (1/1 — 50%), with a significant probability of level at the break and level at Full-Time (x/x — 49%); I assess the remaining options as practically implausible.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Banga | Sūduva | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sūduva is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Banga · 1.6 pts / game - Sūduva
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sūduva is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Banga · 1.14 goals / game - Sūduva
Sūduva is 97% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.57 goals / game - Banga · 0.29 goals / game - Sūduva
Banga scores in 29% of games (2 of 7 meczów), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 meczów).
Sūduva scores in 43% of games (3 of 7 meczów), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Banga
Over / Under - Sūduva
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sūduva is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Banga · 1.43 pts / game - Sūduva
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Banga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Banga
Sūduva
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Banga | Liga | Sūduva | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.57 | 2.27 | ▼ 1.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 35% | ▼ 14% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 14% | 41% | ▼ 14% |
| Clean sheets | • 43% | 42% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 29% | 62% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 68% | ▼ 43% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Banga's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses against Sūduva. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Banga vs Sūduva?
The A Lyga match finished Banga 2:1 Sūduva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Banga and Sūduva?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Banga won 0, Sūduva won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Banga vs Sūduva?
Banga score 1.00 goals per game on average and Sūduva 1.14. The A Lyga average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Banga's matches and 14% of Sūduva's.
What form are Banga and Sūduva in?
Over the last 5 games Banga have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sūduva 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Banga vs Sūduva?
The statistical background for Banga vs Sūduva — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.