Bangor vs Glenavon: match statistics
Bangor displays decidedly better home form than Glenavon's away record. The hosts win 40% of their home matches and have a positive goal differential in home fixtures (-4 GD), while Glenavon has lost 100% of their away matches this season with a disastrous -26 GD. Glenavon has not earned a single point on the road, confirmed by a streak of 14 consecutive away defeats. The visitors' average of 2.43 goals conceded per game against a mere 0.57 scored highlights massive defensive and offensive issues. Bangor, despite their weaker recent form (0.2 PPG in the last 5 matches), should capitalize on the home advantage and the opponent's catastrophic away performance. xG statistics (1.28 for Bangor vs 1.07 for Glenavon) and the hosts' higher shot accuracy (12% vs 7%) further support the forecast of a home victory.
Bangor vs Glenavon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bangor played against Glenavon in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The game was played on February 21, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Bangor has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Glenavon has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Bangor scores 1.21 goals per game and allows 1.69. Glenavon scores 0.79 and allows 2.04. Games in this league average 2.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Bangor's games and 50% of Glenavon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 57%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Bangor has the higher season xG average, 1.19 to 1.13 per game. Bangor takes 8.6 shots per game, while Glenavon takes 8.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Bangor leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.66 goals per game after halftime. Glenavon leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bangor's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). For Glenavon, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NIFL Premiership games average 2.87 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bangor displays decidedly better home form than Glenavon's away record. The hosts win 40% of their home matches and have a positive goal differential in home fixtures (-4 GD), while Glenavon has lost 100% of their away matches this season with a disastrous -26 GD. Glenavon has not earned a single point on the road, confirmed by a streak of 14 consecutive away defeats. The visitors' average of 2.43 goals conceded per game against a mere 0.57 scored highlights massive defensive and offensive issues. Bangor, despite their weaker recent form (0.2 PPG in the last 5 matches), should capitalize on the home advantage and the opponent's catastrophic away performance. xG statistics (1.28 for Bangor vs 1.07 for Glenavon) and the hosts' higher shot accuracy (12% vs 7%) further support the forecast of a home victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bangor | Glenavon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Glenavon is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Bangor · 0.6 pts / game - Glenavon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bangor is 53% better for: goals scored per game.
1.21 goals / game - Bangor · 0.79 goals / game - Glenavon
Bangor is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.69 goals / game - Bangor · 2.04 goals / game - Glenavon
Bangor scores in 69% of games (20 of 29 meczów), while Glenavon keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 28 meczów).
Glenavon scores in 54% of games (15 of 28 meczów), while Bangor keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bangor
Over / Under - Glenavon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bangor is 98% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Bangor · 0.61 pts / game - Glenavon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bangor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Glenavon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bangor
Glenavon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).
Teams vs league
| Bangor | Liga | Glenavon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.90 | 2.87 | • 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 51% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 55% | 55% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 26% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▲ 89% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Bangor's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Glenavon. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Bangor vs Glenavon?
The NIFL Premiership match finished Bangor 0:1 Glenavon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Bangor and Glenavon?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Bangor won 2, Glenavon won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Bangor vs Glenavon?
Bangor score 1.21 goals per game on average and Glenavon 0.79. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Bangor's matches and 50% of Glenavon's.
What form are Bangor and Glenavon in?
Over the last 5 games Bangor have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Glenavon 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bangor vs Glenavon?
The statistical background for Bangor vs Glenavon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.