England - EFL League TwoData current as of September 12, 2026

Barnet vs Cambridge United: match statistics

Barnet crest
Barnet
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Cambridge United crest
Cambridge United
135%(2.58)
X35%(3.15)
230%(2.70)

The match promises to be a close affair, as confirmed by the statistical analysis of both teams. Barnet displays solid home form with a 37% win rate and an average of 1.37 goals per game, while their ball possession advantage (59%) and high xG (1.75) indicate offensive potential. Cambridge United occupies 3rd place in the table and can boast impressive recent form in their last five matches (1.8 points per game) along with excellent away defense (42% clean sheets, averaging 0.84 goals conceded). However, the visitors struggle with chance conversion on the road (32% of matches without scoring), which could hinder their ability to secure all three points. Given that Cambridge draws in 37% of away fixtures and Barnet also has a 26% draw rate at home, a points-sharing scenario appears the most probable. The hosts' slight edge is derived from their superior offensive statistics in home matches.

Barnet vs Cambridge United: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Barnet played against Cambridge United in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Barnet has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Cambridge United has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Barnet scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.10. Cambridge United scores 1.47 and allows 0.74. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 51% of Barnet's games and 47% of Cambridge United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 34%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Barnet has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.38 per game. Barnet takes 13.9 shots per game, while Cambridge United takes 11.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Barnet leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. Cambridge United leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.92 after halftime.

When the teams score

Barnet's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Cambridge United, it is minutes 46-60 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League Two games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be a close affair, as confirmed by the statistical analysis of both teams. Barnet displays solid home form with a 37% win rate and an average of 1.37 goals per game, while their ball possession advantage (59%) and high xG (1.75) indicate offensive potential. Cambridge United occupies 3rd place in the table and can boast impressive recent form in their last five matches (1.8 points per game) along with excellent away defense (42% clean sheets, averaging 0.84 goals conceded). However, the visitors struggle with chance conversion on the road (32% of matches without scoring), which could hinder their ability to secure all three points. Given that Cambridge draws in 37% of away fixtures and Barnet also has a 26% draw rate at home, a points-sharing scenario appears the most probable. The hosts' slight edge is derived from their superior offensive statistics in home matches.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signals for BTTS are mixed, but the advantage leans towards a scenario with one side failing to score. Cambridge boasts a solid defense: they concede only 0.84 goals per match on average this season, and in their last 5 matches just 0.4 (2 goals total) with an xG against of 0.89, which significantly lowers Barnet's chances of finding the net. On the flip side, Barnet has been very resilient defensively this campaign (0.63 goals conceded per match, 42% clean sheets), so Cambridge – despite averaging 1.16 goals scored per match – might struggle to break them down consistently. The BTTS percentages are not decisive either (Barnet 53%, Cambridge 42%), and both teams' low Over 2.5 rates (37% and 32%) point towards more 1:0/2:0/0:1 outcomes than high-scoring affairs. Additionally, Cambridge's high FTS rate of 32% further increases the risk of them drawing a blank in this fixture.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model based on average goals and xG suggests a moderate scoring match: approximately 1.15 goals for Barnet and 1.05 for Cambridge (total 2.20). In seasonal data, both teams more often play below 2.5 goals (Barnet 63% U2.5, Cambridge 68% U2.5), which reinforces the 1-2 goals scenario. The risk of a very high score is also limited by low Over 3.5 rates, especially Cambridge (only 5% O3.5) and high Under 3.5 percentages (Barnet 79%, Cambridge 95%). Defensively, it looks stable: Barnet concedes an average of 0.63 goals, and Cambridge 0.84, with similar xGA around 1.0, which does not support a 'goal fest'. The last 5 matches further indicate a stronger defense for Cambridge (0.4 conceded/match, xGA 0.89), which limits the goal ceiling. Therefore, the strongest signal is the Under 3.5 bet as the most likely scenario relative to the base data and result distribution.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Barnet have a clearly superior home season profile (2.32 PPG, 68% wins) compared to Cambridge's away form (1.47 PPG, 37% wins), reinforcing scenarios where the hosts secure the win by full-time. In first halves, Barnet rarely concede (0.21 goals/HT) and boast a very high rate of clean sheets at the break (79%), making a lead at HT a realistic prospect despite generally low first-half goal counts (AVGHT 0.84). Offensively, Barnet generate more quality and pressure (xG 1.51 vs 1.24, shots on target 4.47 vs 2.74) and have a better conversion rate (14% vs 11%), favouring taking and maintaining a lead. Cambridge in their last 5 matches have been solid defensively (0.4 conceded/match) and often draw, which increases the share of the X/1 and X/X outcomes, but Barnet's advantage remains more stable long-term. Additionally, Barnet are strong after the interval (2.11 PPG in 2nd halves, 63% wins), limiting the risk of a turnaround after taking a lead. The most probable Half-Time/Full-Time pattern is Barnet leading at the break and carrying the victory through to the end.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
BarnetCambridge United
7Shots8
BarnetCambridge United
1Shots on target1
BarnetCambridge United
0.82xG0.93
BarnetCambridge United
6Corners4
BarnetCambridge United
40Dangerous attacks48
BarnetCambridge United
7Fouls11
BarnetCambridge United
0Cards0
BarnetCambridge United

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

BarnetCambridge United
1.26Goals scored / game1.47
BarnetCambridge United
1.1Goals allowed / game0.74
BarnetCambridge United
56%Average possession51%
BarnetCambridge United
4.54Shots on target / game3.61
BarnetCambridge United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.9Shots per game11.39
BarnetCambridge United
4.54Shots on target3.61
BarnetCambridge United
9%Shot conversion12.9%
BarnetCambridge United
56%Possession51%
BarnetCambridge United
1.64xG for1.38
BarnetCambridge United
1.14xG against1.02
BarnetCambridge United

Shooting quality

Barnet: BalancedCambridge United: Balanced
BarnetCambridge United
Accuracy (shots on target)33%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cambridge United is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Barnet · 1.8 pts / game - Cambridge United

Barnet
WLLDW
Season result split
38% W31% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-12-12
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-7
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Cambridge United
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
53% W32% D16% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-12-6
1.89 pts / game · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-7-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cambridge United is 17% better for: goals scored per game.

1.26 goals / game - Barnet · 1.47 goals / game - Cambridge United

Cambridge United is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.1 goals / game - Barnet · 0.74 goals / game - Cambridge United

Barnet scoring profile: strong

Barnet scores in 77% of games (30 of 39 meczów), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 42% (16 of 38 meczów).

Cambridge United scoring profile: strong

Cambridge United scores in 79% of games (30 of 38 meczów), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 36% (14 of 39 meczów).

49Goals scored (season)56
BarnetCambridge United
43Goals conceded (season)28
BarnetCambridge United
2.36Average goals per game2.21
BarnetCambridge United
6Goals scored (last 5)8
BarnetCambridge United
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
BarnetCambridge United

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal79%
BarnetCambridge United
33%2 goals45%
BarnetCambridge United
13%3 goals16%
BarnetCambridge United
3%4 goals5%
BarnetCambridge United

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal58%
BarnetCambridge United
33%2 goals13%
BarnetCambridge United
10%3 goals3%
BarnetCambridge United
3%4 goals0%
BarnetCambridge United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
Cambridge United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 38 meczów
52%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time13%
BarnetCambridge United
3%BTTS in both halves3%
BarnetCambridge United
21%Scored in both halves24%
BarnetCambridge United

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
BarnetCambridge United
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
BarnetCambridge United
60%BTTS - last 540%
BarnetCambridge United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
BarnetCambridge United
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
BarnetCambridge United
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
BarnetCambridge United

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
BarnetCambridge United
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
BarnetCambridge United
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
BarnetCambridge United

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cambridge United is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - Barnet · 1.53 pts / game - Cambridge United

Barnet - half-time state
31% leading46% draw23% trailing
Cambridge United - half-time state
37% leading42% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)1.53
BarnetCambridge United
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.55
BarnetCambridge United
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.37
BarnetCambridge United
1.18Average goals (1st half)0.92
BarnetCambridge United
59%Clean sheet before half-time71%
BarnetCambridge United
49%No goal before half-time53%
BarnetCambridge United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.49Points per game (2nd half)1.79
BarnetCambridge United
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
BarnetCambridge United
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.37
BarnetCambridge United
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.29
BarnetCambridge United
56%Clean sheet after half-time66%
BarnetCambridge United
54%No goal after half-time45%
BarnetCambridge United

Barnet - second-half results

38% W33% D28% L
54
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Cambridge United - second-half results

47% W37% D16% L
58
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
68
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Barnet - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Cambridge United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.20
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Barnet
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
6
3
16-30
11
12
31-45
7
5
46-60
5
8
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Cambridge United
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
7
31-45
13
4
46-60
9
6
61-75
13
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Barnet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Cambridge United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

BarnetLigaCambridge United
Average goals per game 2.362.55 2.21
Both teams scored 51%52% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%47% 34%
Clean sheets 36%27% 42%
Goal before half-time 67%67% 63%
Goal after half-time 74%77% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / game
1.21
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Shayne LaveryOff: James Brophy
  2. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Glenn McConnellOff: Dominic Ball
  3. BarnetSubstitutionOn: Diallang JaiyesimiOff: Phillip Chinedu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Martin WoodsMatches officiated: 9
3.67Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 244%Home wins22%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Barnet's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Cambridge United. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Cambridge United FC
0 : 0
Barnet FC

FAQ

What was the result of Barnet vs Cambridge United?

The EFL League Two match finished Barnet 1:0 Cambridge United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Barnet vs Cambridge United?

Barnet score 1.26 goals per game on average and Cambridge United 1.47. The EFL League Two average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Barnet's matches and 47% of Cambridge United's.

What form are Barnet and Cambridge United in?

Over the last 5 games Barnet have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Cambridge United 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Barnet vs Cambridge United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.