Barnet vs Cambridge United: match statistics
The match promises to be a close affair, as confirmed by the statistical analysis of both teams. Barnet displays solid home form with a 37% win rate and an average of 1.37 goals per game, while their ball possession advantage (59%) and high xG (1.75) indicate offensive potential. Cambridge United occupies 3rd place in the table and can boast impressive recent form in their last five matches (1.8 points per game) along with excellent away defense (42% clean sheets, averaging 0.84 goals conceded). However, the visitors struggle with chance conversion on the road (32% of matches without scoring), which could hinder their ability to secure all three points. Given that Cambridge draws in 37% of away fixtures and Barnet also has a 26% draw rate at home, a points-sharing scenario appears the most probable. The hosts' slight edge is derived from their superior offensive statistics in home matches.
Barnet vs Cambridge United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Barnet played against Cambridge United in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Barnet has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Cambridge United has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Barnet scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.10. Cambridge United scores 1.47 and allows 0.74. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 51% of Barnet's games and 47% of Cambridge United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 34%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Barnet has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.38 per game. Barnet takes 13.9 shots per game, while Cambridge United takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Barnet leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. Cambridge United leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.92 after halftime.
When the teams score
Barnet's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Cambridge United, it is minutes 46-60 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match promises to be a close affair, as confirmed by the statistical analysis of both teams. Barnet displays solid home form with a 37% win rate and an average of 1.37 goals per game, while their ball possession advantage (59%) and high xG (1.75) indicate offensive potential. Cambridge United occupies 3rd place in the table and can boast impressive recent form in their last five matches (1.8 points per game) along with excellent away defense (42% clean sheets, averaging 0.84 goals conceded). However, the visitors struggle with chance conversion on the road (32% of matches without scoring), which could hinder their ability to secure all three points. Given that Cambridge draws in 37% of away fixtures and Barnet also has a 26% draw rate at home, a points-sharing scenario appears the most probable. The hosts' slight edge is derived from their superior offensive statistics in home matches.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signals for BTTS are mixed, but the advantage leans towards a scenario with one side failing to score. Cambridge boasts a solid defense: they concede only 0.84 goals per match on average this season, and in their last 5 matches just 0.4 (2 goals total) with an xG against of 0.89, which significantly lowers Barnet's chances of finding the net. On the flip side, Barnet has been very resilient defensively this campaign (0.63 goals conceded per match, 42% clean sheets), so Cambridge – despite averaging 1.16 goals scored per match – might struggle to break them down consistently. The BTTS percentages are not decisive either (Barnet 53%, Cambridge 42%), and both teams' low Over 2.5 rates (37% and 32%) point towards more 1:0/2:0/0:1 outcomes than high-scoring affairs. Additionally, Cambridge's high FTS rate of 32% further increases the risk of them drawing a blank in this fixture.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model based on average goals and xG suggests a moderate scoring match: approximately 1.15 goals for Barnet and 1.05 for Cambridge (total 2.20). In seasonal data, both teams more often play below 2.5 goals (Barnet 63% U2.5, Cambridge 68% U2.5), which reinforces the 1-2 goals scenario. The risk of a very high score is also limited by low Over 3.5 rates, especially Cambridge (only 5% O3.5) and high Under 3.5 percentages (Barnet 79%, Cambridge 95%). Defensively, it looks stable: Barnet concedes an average of 0.63 goals, and Cambridge 0.84, with similar xGA around 1.0, which does not support a 'goal fest'. The last 5 matches further indicate a stronger defense for Cambridge (0.4 conceded/match, xGA 0.89), which limits the goal ceiling. Therefore, the strongest signal is the Under 3.5 bet as the most likely scenario relative to the base data and result distribution.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Barnet have a clearly superior home season profile (2.32 PPG, 68% wins) compared to Cambridge's away form (1.47 PPG, 37% wins), reinforcing scenarios where the hosts secure the win by full-time. In first halves, Barnet rarely concede (0.21 goals/HT) and boast a very high rate of clean sheets at the break (79%), making a lead at HT a realistic prospect despite generally low first-half goal counts (AVGHT 0.84). Offensively, Barnet generate more quality and pressure (xG 1.51 vs 1.24, shots on target 4.47 vs 2.74) and have a better conversion rate (14% vs 11%), favouring taking and maintaining a lead. Cambridge in their last 5 matches have been solid defensively (0.4 conceded/match) and often draw, which increases the share of the X/1 and X/X outcomes, but Barnet's advantage remains more stable long-term. Additionally, Barnet are strong after the interval (2.11 PPG in 2nd halves, 63% wins), limiting the risk of a turnaround after taking a lead. The most probable Half-Time/Full-Time pattern is Barnet leading at the break and carrying the victory through to the end.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Barnet | Cambridge United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cambridge United is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Barnet · 1.8 pts / game - Cambridge United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cambridge United is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.26 goals / game - Barnet · 1.47 goals / game - Cambridge United
Cambridge United is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Barnet · 0.74 goals / game - Cambridge United
Barnet scores in 77% of games (30 of 39 meczów), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 42% (16 of 38 meczów).
Cambridge United scores in 79% of games (30 of 38 meczów), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 36% (14 of 39 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Barnet
Over / Under - Cambridge United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cambridge United is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - Barnet · 1.53 pts / game - Cambridge United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Barnet - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cambridge United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Barnet
Cambridge United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Barnet | Liga | Cambridge United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.36 | 2.55 | ▼ 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | • 51% | 52% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 47% | ▼ 34% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 27% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 67% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 77% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Barnet's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Cambridge United. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Barnet vs Cambridge United?
The EFL League Two match finished Barnet 1:0 Cambridge United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Barnet vs Cambridge United?
Barnet score 1.26 goals per game on average and Cambridge United 1.47. The EFL League Two average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Barnet's matches and 47% of Cambridge United's.
What form are Barnet and Cambridge United in?
Over the last 5 games Barnet have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Cambridge United 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Barnet vs Cambridge United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


