Barnet vs Cheltenham Town: match statistics
Barnet vs Cheltenham Town: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Barnet played against Cheltenham Town in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: The Hive Stadium. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Barnet has 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Cheltenham Town has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Barnet scores 3.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. Cheltenham Town scores 1.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.42 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Barnet's games and 100% of Cheltenham Town's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Barnet has the higher season xG average, 1.91 to 1.31 per game. Barnet takes 17.5 shots per game, while Cheltenham Town takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Barnet leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. Cheltenham Town leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Barnet's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Cheltenham Town, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 2.42 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Barnet are top of the table and have won both of their league matches so far, scoring 6 goals and conceding just 2, while Cheltenham sit 16th. At home, the hosts average 3 goals per game, register 20 shots, including 8 on target, and post a high average xG of 2.23. Cheltenham have lost four of their last five matches and conceded as many as 14 goals during that run, which significantly weakens their chances against an opponent in such strong momentum. Away from home, the visitors have lost every match so far, conceding an average of 2 goals, while their shot conversion rate stands at just 7%, compared with Barnet’s 15%. Although Cheltenham average 58% possession and create chances worth 1.70 xG, Barnet’s edge in form, attacking quality and home advantage points to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far this season, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Barnet score an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Cheltenham concede 2.0, which strongly supports a home goal. The visitors average 1.0 goal per game, but their 1.70 xG and 6 shots on target per match indicate that they should create enough chances against a Barnet defense allowing 1.96 xG. In their last five matches, Barnet have recorded BTTS in 100% of games, while Cheltenham’s rate stands at 80%; at the same time, the hosts have conceded an average of 1.4 goals. Although the league-wide BTTS average is only 46%, the profile of both teams—particularly the absence of clean sheets and Cheltenham’s weak defense, conceding an average of 2.8 goals in their last five matches—clearly points towards a Goal/Goal scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Barnet average 2.0 goals per match, while Cheltenham concede 2.0, creating favorable conditions for the hosts to score. The visitors generate 1.70 xG per game, while Barnet allow opponents 1.96 xG, making a Cheltenham goal a realistic scenario as well. In their last five matches, Barnet scored an average of 2.8 goals, while Cheltenham conceded as many as 2.8, with both teams recording 100% of matches featuring at least three goals during this run. All matches played by both teams so far have gone Over 1.5 goals, and neither side has kept a clean sheet. Over 1.5 therefore has the strongest support from both current attacking form and the opponents' defensive weaknesses.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Barnet are in clearly better current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.8 goals, while Cheltenham have lost 4 of their 5 games and conceded 2.8 goals per match. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the hosts have scored an average of 1.4 goals before the break, compared with just 0.2 for the visitors, while Cheltenham have conceded as many as 1.8 goals per game before half-time. Barnet were leading at the break in 40% of their last five appearances and were never behind at half-time, whereas Cheltenham were losing after 45 minutes in 80% of those matches. The hosts also have a clear season-long advantage in terms of results: they have won all of their matches so far, scoring an average of 2.0 goals, while their opponents are yet to earn a point and concede an average of 2.0 goals. A scenario in which Barnet lead at half-time and maintain their winning position is therefore most consistent with their form, attacking output and Cheltenham’s defensive weaknesses.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Barnet | Cheltenham Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 50% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.55 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Barnet is 100% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Barnet · 1.5 pts / game - Cheltenham Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barnet is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
3 goals / game - Barnet · 1.5 goals / game - Cheltenham Town
Barnet is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Barnet · 1.5 goals / game - Cheltenham Town
Barnet scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Cheltenham Town keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
Cheltenham Town scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Barnet
Over / Under - Cheltenham Town
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnet is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Barnet · 1.5 pts / game - Cheltenham Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Barnet - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cheltenham Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Barnet
Cheltenham Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Barnet | Liga | Cheltenham Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 2.42 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 46% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 46% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 33% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 71% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Barnet's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Cheltenham Town. Games average 0.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Barnet vs Cheltenham Town?
The EFL League Two match finished Barnet 2:2 Cheltenham Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Barnet and Cheltenham Town?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Barnet won 1, Cheltenham Town won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Barnet vs Cheltenham Town?
Barnet score 3.00 goals per game on average and Cheltenham Town 1.50. The EFL League Two average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Barnet's matches and 100% of Cheltenham Town's.
What form are Barnet and Cheltenham Town in?
Over the last 5 games Barnet have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Cheltenham Town 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Barnet vs Cheltenham Town?
The statistical background for Barnet vs Cheltenham Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


