Barnsley vs AFC Wimbledon: match statistics
Barnsley demonstrates a clear home advantage with a 54% win rate and an impressive +7 goal difference at their home ground. The hosts score an average of 2.08 goals per match at home, while AFC Wimbledon concedes an average of 1.73 goals in away matches with a poor -7 goal difference. xG statistics also favor Barnsley (1.5 vs 1.06), indicating a higher quality of chances created. AFC Wimbledon has only a 40% away win rate and as many as 47% losses, making them a difficult opponent for the hosts to defeat. Despite Barnsley's recent slightly poorer form (1 PPG in the last 5 matches), their home advantage and statistical edge should decide the hosts' victory in this encounter.
Barnsley vs AFC Wimbledon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Barnsley played against AFC Wimbledon in EFL League One (England). The game was played on February 14, 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Barnsley has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. AFC Wimbledon has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Barnsley scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 1.70. AFC Wimbledon scores 1.10 and allows 1.31. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Barnsley's games and 45% of AFC Wimbledon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 45%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Barnsley has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.12 per game. Barnsley takes 11.8 shots per game, while AFC Wimbledon takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Barnsley leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. AFC Wimbledon leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Barnsley's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). For AFC Wimbledon, it is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Barnsley demonstrates a clear home advantage with a 54% win rate and an impressive +7 goal difference at their home ground. The hosts score an average of 2.08 goals per match at home, while AFC Wimbledon concedes an average of 1.73 goals in away matches with a poor -7 goal difference. xG statistics also favor Barnsley (1.5 vs 1.06), indicating a higher quality of chances created. AFC Wimbledon has only a 40% away win rate and as many as 47% losses, making them a difficult opponent for the hosts to defeat. Despite Barnsley's recent slightly poorer form (1 PPG in the last 5 matches), their home advantage and statistical edge should decide the hosts' victory in this encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Barnsley | AFC Wimbledon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AFC Wimbledon is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Barnsley · 1.4 pts / game - AFC Wimbledon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barnsley is 48% better for: goals scored per game.
1.63 goals / game - Barnsley · 1.1 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.7 goals / game - Barnsley · 1.31 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon
Barnsley scores in 74% of games (20 of 27 meczów), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 meczów).
AFC Wimbledon scores in 59% of games (17 of 29 meczów), while Barnsley keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Barnsley
Over / Under - AFC Wimbledon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnsley is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / game - Barnsley · 1.21 pts / game - AFC Wimbledon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Barnsley - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
AFC Wimbledon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Barnsley
AFC Wimbledon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Barnsley | Liga | AFC Wimbledon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.33 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 51% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 50% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 27% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 68% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 96% | 81% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Barnsley's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against AFC Wimbledon. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Barnsley vs AFC Wimbledon?
The EFL League One match finished Barnsley 3:3 AFC Wimbledon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Barnsley vs AFC Wimbledon?
Barnsley score 1.63 goals per game on average and AFC Wimbledon 1.10. The EFL League One average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Barnsley's matches and 45% of AFC Wimbledon's.
What form are Barnsley and AFC Wimbledon in?
Over the last 5 games Barnsley have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and AFC Wimbledon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Barnsley vs AFC Wimbledon?
The statistical background for Barnsley vs AFC Wimbledon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.