Basingstoke Town vs Sholing: match statistics
Basingstoke Town vs Sholing: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Basingstoke Town played against Sholing in Southern League Premier South (England). The game was played on April 6, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Basingstoke Town has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sholing has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Basingstoke Town scores 1.37 goals per game and allows 1.76. Sholing scores 1.76 and allows 1.26. Games in this league average 3.14 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 66% of Basingstoke Town's games and 63% of Sholing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 50%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Basingstoke Town has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.24 per game. Basingstoke Town takes 1.5 shots per game, while Sholing takes 1.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Basingstoke Town leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Sholing leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
Basingstoke Town's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Sholing, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Southern League Premier South games average 3.14 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win because Sholing have 17 victories this season versus Basingstoke’s 11, and over the last 5 matches they average 1.6 points per game compared to the hosts’ 1.2. The visitors’ main advantage is defensively: they concede only 1.05 goals per away match on average and keep a clean sheet in 42% of away games, whereas Basingstoke concede 1.79 goals at home and have just 11% clean sheets. The hosts, however, generate more quality chances — averaging 1.93 xG and 8 shots on target per home match with a conversion around 17%, which has translated into 1.37 home goals per game and 9 goals in the last 5 fixtures. The visitors have scored only 5 goals in their last 5 matches, and their away shot average is 8.86 with 3.14 on target, so I expect a balanced game with goals at both ends. Overall I give Sholing the greater probability due to a steadier defense and the superior season record, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Basingstoke has a high BTTS rate at home (74%) versus Sholing’s 53% away and the league average of 60%, which strongly supports a Goal/Goal scenario. Hosts average 2.42 goals per home match with xG 1.51 and a conversion rate of 20%, failing to score in only 5% of home games, so Basingstoke’s attack looks genuinely threatening. Sholing average 1.11 goals per away match with xG 1.13, but register 42% clean sheets and fail to score in 21% of away fixtures, which undermines confidence in the visitors finding the net. In the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60% of games; goal balances are 9 scored/8 conceded for the hosts and 5/5 for the visitors, indicating open matches. Considering the hosts’ 74% BTTS, the xG advantage 1.51 vs 1.15 for the hosts and higher shots on target 6.33 vs 3.14, I assign 66% to BTTS - Yes and 34% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive data analysis: Basingstoke’s attacking xG is 1.51 and Sholing’s defensive xG conceded is 1.15, yielding about 1.33 expected goals for the home side; for the visitors the attacking xG is 1.13 and the home defensive xG conceded is 0.79, giving 0.96, for a total of 2.29 expected goals. A Poisson distribution with an expected sum of 2.29 implies roughly a 66.7% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 40.2% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5). Seasonally Basingstoke have had 95% of home matches over 1.5, and Sholing 63% away — a 60/40 weighted average is 82.2%, so after weighting the model and seasonal data I arrive at approximately 76% for Over 1.5. Over 2.5 is weaker (~49%, weighted seasonal average 54.8% vs model 40.2%), and Over 3.5 is around 31%, therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (home team leads at the break and wins), which I assign a 34% probability. Basingstoke scores on average 2.42 goals per match versus Sholing’s 1.11, has a higher xG 1.51 vs 1.13 and more shots on target 6.33 vs 3.14, translating into a 58% home win rate. At half-time Basingstoke averages 1.21 goals, Sholing 0.53; the home side led at the break 9 times (47%), and in the last 5 matches Basingstoke led at the break in 60% (3 of 5), while Sholing were level at half-time in 80% (4 of 5). Therefore the second-strongest signal is X/1 (draw HT, home win) at 18%, and the draw-draw outcome (X/X) I rate at 12% due to the frequent HT draws on the visitors’ side (79%). Options favorable to the away team I rate low: 1/2 5%, 2/1 6%, 2/X 5%, 2/2 4% — totaling 20% — given Sholing’s only 11% HT leads and lower xG of 1.13.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Basingstoke Town | Sholing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 18% | 17% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 1.05 | 0.64 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 5.27 | 5.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sholing is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Basingstoke Town · 1.6 pts / game - Sholing
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sholing is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
1.37 goals / game - Basingstoke Town · 1.76 goals / game - Sholing
Sholing is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.76 goals / game - Basingstoke Town · 1.26 goals / game - Sholing
Basingstoke Town scores in 74% of games (28 of 38 games), while Sholing keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 games).
Sholing scores in 87% of games (33 of 38 games), while Basingstoke Town keeps a clean sheet in 11% (4 of 38 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Basingstoke Town
Over / Under - Sholing
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sholing is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / game - Basingstoke Town · 1.42 pts / game - Sholing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Basingstoke Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sholing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Basingstoke Town
Sholing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Southern League Premier South).
Teams vs league
| Basingstoke Town | Liga | Sholing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.13 | 3.14 | ▼ 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 66% | 60% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 61% | 61% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 22% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 77% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | • 84% | 84% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Basingstoke Town's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Sholing. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Basingstoke Town vs Sholing?
The Southern League Premier South match finished Basingstoke Town 1:0 Sholing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Basingstoke Town vs Sholing?
Basingstoke Town score 1.37 goals per game on average and Sholing 1.76. The Southern League Premier South average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 66% of Basingstoke Town's matches and 63% of Sholing's.
What form are Basingstoke Town and Sholing in?
Over the last 5 games Basingstoke Town have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Sholing 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Basingstoke Town vs Sholing?
The statistical background for Basingstoke Town vs Sholing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


