Bayelsa United vs Remo Stars: match statistics
Bayelsa United vs Remo Stars: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bayelsa United played against Remo Stars in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on December 14, 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Bayelsa United has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Remo Stars has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Bayelsa United scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.25. Remo Stars scores 1.00 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 1.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Bayelsa United's games and 44% of Remo Stars's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 38%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 25% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Remo Stars has the higher season xG average, 1.38 to 1.23 per game. Bayelsa United takes 7.8 shots per game, while Remo Stars takes 8.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Bayelsa United leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Remo Stars leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bayelsa United's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Remo Stars, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.83 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 25% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bayelsa United | Remo Stars | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Remo Stars is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Bayelsa United · 1.8 pts / game - Remo Stars
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Remo Stars is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Bayelsa United · 1.19 goals / game - Remo Stars
Bayelsa United scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 meczów).
Remo Stars scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while Bayelsa United keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bayelsa United
Over / Under - Remo Stars
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bayelsa United is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / game - Bayelsa United · 1 pts / game - Remo Stars
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bayelsa United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Remo Stars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bayelsa United
Remo Stars
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Bayelsa United | Liga | Remo Stars | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.25 | 1.83 | ▲ 2.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 38% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 25% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 37% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 69% | 56% | • 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Bayelsa UnitedGoalFabby Clark
FAQ
What was the result of Bayelsa United vs Remo Stars?
The NPFL match finished Bayelsa United 2:1 Remo Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bayelsa United vs Remo Stars?
Bayelsa United score 1.00 goals per game on average and Remo Stars 1.00. The NPFL average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Bayelsa United's matches and 44% of Remo Stars's.
What form are Bayelsa United and Remo Stars in?
Over the last 5 games Bayelsa United have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Remo Stars 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bayelsa United vs Remo Stars?
The statistical background for Bayelsa United vs Remo Stars — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.