Bayern München vs Heidenheim: match statistics
Bayern München vs Heidenheim: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bayern München played against Heidenheim in Bundesliga (Germany). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Bayern München has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Heidenheim has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Bayern München scores 3.65 goals per game and allows 1.03. Heidenheim scores 1.13 and allows 2.13. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Bayern München's games and 61% of Heidenheim's. The Over 2.5 rates are 97% and 68%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Bayern München has the higher season xG average, 2.30 to 1.23 per game. Bayern München takes 19.2 shots per game, while Heidenheim takes 11.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Bayern München leads at halftime in 61% of its games and scores 2.16 goals per game after halftime. Heidenheim leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.74 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bayern München's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (33 goals). For Heidenheim, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Bundesliga games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bayern München holds a clear advantage: they have scored 113 goals this season and average 4.0 goals per home game with an 87% home win rate, while Heidenheim have 35 goals this season and win only 7% of away matches. In chance creation Bayern average 21.6 shots per match (9.13 on target) with a 19% conversion rate and xG 2.5, whereas Heidenheim average 11.27 shots (3.07 on target), 7% conversion and xG 1.21. Defensively the visitors concede 2.07 goals away on average and register 0% clean sheets on the road, while Bayern concede 1.0 at home and have an average xG against of 0.98, indicating a clear superiority in the quality of chances for the hosts. Bayern have scored 18 goals in the last 5 matches (3.6 per match) and won 4 of 5, while Heidenheim have 11 goals and a 2-2-1 record in that period, with the visitors failing to score in 40% of away games; therefore I expect a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams display high seasonal BTTS rates: Bayern 63% and Heidenheim 60% versus a league level of 61%, indicating a bias toward the "both teams to score" scenario. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 80% of games for both sides, with average goals scored 3.6 (Bayern) and 2.2 (Heidenheim) and average goals conceded 2.6 and 1.6 respectively, pointing to frequent goal exchanges. Defensive factors also favor BTTS: Bayern have only 6% clean sheets, Heidenheim 0% away clean sheets, and Heidenheim have conceded 66 goals this season versus Bayern's 32 conceded. Additionally Bayern have scored 113 goals this season, and in the last 5 matches average xG is 2.25 for Bayern versus 1.31 for Heidenheim with xG against of 1.37 and 1.49, suggesting both sides create chances and are vulnerable to conceding; therefore the recommendation is BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of around 80%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project the strongest market is Over 2.5 goals. Combining Bayern’s seasonal attacking xG 1.25 with Heidenheim’s seasonal xG conceded 1.72 and form (last 5 matches: Bayern xG 2.25, Heidenheim xG conceded 1.49) yields expected goals for Bayern ≈1.68. For Heidenheim, the combination of attacking xG 1.21 and Bayern’s defense (1.69) plus recent figures 1.31/1.37 gives expected ≈1.40, totaling 3.08 goals in the match. Additionally, Bayern have 113 goals scored this season and average 3.6 goals in their last 5 matches, and their shot conversion is 13% versus Heidenheim’s 7%, which strengthens the goal potential. Considering Bayern have 75% of home matches over 2.5, Heidenheim 60%, and Over 2.5 occurred in 80% of the last 5 matches for both teams, I recommend the Over side at 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Bayern leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1). The hosts led at the break in 4 matches (25%) versus just 1 case (7%) for Heidenheim, and the average first-half goals are 0.56 for Bayern compared to 0.20 for the visitors. A half-time draw also occurs frequently (hosts 31%, visitors 47%), so an alternative is X/1. In the last 5 matches Bayern averaged 1.6 first-half goals with 80% of wins in that period, while Heidenheim has 0.8 first-half goals and 40% wins in the same timeframe. Additionally, Bayern have xG of 1.25 versus 1.21, better shot conversion 13% vs 7% and more shots on target (3.88 vs 3.07), and the hosts recorded 81% of matches with at least one goal by the break; hence the recommendation of 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bayern München | Heidenheim | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Bayern München is 88% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Bayern München · 1.6 pts / game - Heidenheim
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bayern München is 223% better for: goals scored per game.
3.65 goals / game - Bayern München · 1.13 goals / game - Heidenheim
Bayern München is 107% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.03 goals / game - Bayern München · 2.13 goals / game - Heidenheim
Bayern München scores in 100% of games (31 of 31 meczów), while Heidenheim keeps a clean sheet in 3% (1 of 31 meczów).
Heidenheim scores in 65% of games (20 of 31 meczów), while Bayern München keeps a clean sheet in 35% (11 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bayern München
Over / Under - Heidenheim
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bayern München is 141% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.1 pts / game - Bayern München · 0.87 pts / game - Heidenheim
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bayern München - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 61% of games and wins 84%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Heidenheim - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 16%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +11 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (33 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +23 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bayern München
Heidenheim
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).
Teams vs league
| Bayern München | Liga | Heidenheim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.68 | 3.20 | • 3.26 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 61% | • 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 97% | 63% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 22% | ▼ 3% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 94% | 77% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 97% | 85% | ▲ 97% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Bayern München's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Heidenheim. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Bayern München vs Heidenheim?
The Bundesliga match finished Bayern München 3:3 Heidenheim. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bayern München vs Heidenheim?
Bayern München score 3.65 goals per game on average and Heidenheim 1.13. The Bundesliga average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Bayern München's matches and 61% of Heidenheim's.
What form are Bayern München and Heidenheim in?
Over the last 5 games Bayern München have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Heidenheim 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bayern München vs Heidenheim?
The statistical background for Bayern München vs Heidenheim — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


