Beerschot-Wilrijk vs RFC Seraing: match statistics
Beerschot-Wilrijk presents definitely better home form with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference (+5) at their own stadium. RFC Seraing has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), and their away goal difference stands at -11, evidencing serious problems in both defense and offense. The hosts average 1.5 goals per home match, while the guests score only 0.67 goals away and fail to score in 56% of matches. Although both teams have identical form in the last 5 matches (0.8 PPG), Beerschot-Wilrijk's advantage at home and RFC Seraing's dismal away results point to a certain victory for the hosts. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.69 vs 1.42), confirming their higher quality of offensive play.
Beerschot-Wilrijk vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Beerschot-Wilrijk played against RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on January 27, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Beerschot-Wilrijk has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. RFC Seraing has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Beerschot-Wilrijk scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.05. RFC Seraing scores 1.05 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Beerschot-Wilrijk's games and 58% of RFC Seraing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 53%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Beerschot-Wilrijk has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.39 per game. Beerschot-Wilrijk takes 15.2 shots per game, while RFC Seraing takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Beerschot-Wilrijk leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 1.10 goals per game after halftime. RFC Seraing leads at halftime in 5% and scores 0.74 after halftime.
When the teams score
Beerschot-Wilrijk's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For RFC Seraing, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.78 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beerschot-Wilrijk presents definitely better home form with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference (+5) at their own stadium. RFC Seraing has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), and their away goal difference stands at -11, evidencing serious problems in both defense and offense. The hosts average 1.5 goals per home match, while the guests score only 0.67 goals away and fail to score in 56% of matches. Although both teams have identical form in the last 5 matches (0.8 PPG), Beerschot-Wilrijk's advantage at home and RFC Seraing's dismal away results point to a certain victory for the hosts. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.69 vs 1.42), confirming their higher quality of offensive play.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Beerschot-Wilrijk | RFC Seraing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 43% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 1.05 goals / game - RFC Seraing
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 55% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.05 goals / game - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 1.63 goals / game - RFC Seraing
Beerschot-Wilrijk scores in 90% of games (18 of 20 meczów), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 meczów).
RFC Seraing scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while Beerschot-Wilrijk keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Over / Under - RFC Seraing
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 138% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Beerschot-Wilrijk · 0.63 pts / game - RFC Seraing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beerschot-Wilrijk - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
RFC Seraing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 16%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Beerschot-Wilrijk
RFC Seraing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Beerschot-Wilrijk | Liga | RFC Seraing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.55 | 2.78 | • 2.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 52% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 26% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 73% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 79% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Beerschot-Wilrijk's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against RFC Seraing. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Beerschot-Wilrijk vs RFC Seraing?
The First Division B match finished Beerschot-Wilrijk 0:0 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Beerschot-Wilrijk vs RFC Seraing?
Beerschot-Wilrijk score 1.50 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.05. The First Division B average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Beerschot-Wilrijk's matches and 58% of RFC Seraing's.
What form are Beerschot-Wilrijk and RFC Seraing in?
Over the last 5 games Beerschot-Wilrijk have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beerschot-Wilrijk vs RFC Seraing?
The statistical background for Beerschot-Wilrijk vs RFC Seraing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.