Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva: match statistics
Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Beitar Jerusalem played against Maccabi Petah Tikva in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The game was played on September 15, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Beitar Jerusalem has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Maccabi Petah Tikva has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Beitar Jerusalem scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 2.33. Maccabi Petah Tikva scores 1.67 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.11 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Beitar Jerusalem's games and 100% of Maccabi Petah Tikva's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 100%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.38 per game. Beitar Jerusalem takes 11.0 shots per game, while Maccabi Petah Tikva takes 18.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Beitar Jerusalem leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Maccabi Petah Tikva leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Beitar Jerusalem's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For Maccabi Petah Tikva, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Israeli Premier League games average 3.11 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Maccabi Petah Tikva sit 3rd, while Beitar Jerusalem are only 12th, and the gap is also reflected in their recent form: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 2 wins for the hosts. Beitar lost their only home match so far, conceding as many as 4 goals while scoring just 1, whereas Maccabi won their away fixture and scored 2 goals. The visitors are clearly more clinical, converting 17% of their shots into goals compared with Beitar’s 8%, while also averaging 5 shots on target away from home versus 3 for the hosts. Although Beitar average 73% possession at home, this does not translate into higher-quality chances, as their average xG stands at 1.34 compared with Maccabi’s 1.51. The hosts’ vulnerable defense, which has conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches, should allow the in-form visitors to gain the upper hand.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for BTTS - Yes is clear, as both teams have recorded goals from both sides in 100% of their matches so far, and neither has kept a clean sheet. Beitar averages 1.5 goals scored and 1.5 conceded, while Maccabi Petah Tikva scores 2.0 goals per match and concedes just 1.0, which supports the expectation of an away goal followed by a response from the hosts. In their last five matches, Beitar allowed opponents to score 2.2 goals per game, while Maccabi averaged 2.0 goals during the same period. The hosts also create plenty of chances, averaging 21.5 shots and 7.0 shots on target per match, while Maccabi's xG stands at 1.61, giving both attacks a solid foundation to find the net. The latest BTTS form—60% for Beitar and 80% for Maccabi—also exceeds or confirms the league average of 62%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams exceeded the 1.5-goal line in 100% of their matches so far, and in every game they both scored and conceded at least one goal. Beitar conceded an average of 2.2 goals in their last five appearances, while Maccabi Petah Tikva scored 2.0 goals per match over the same period. Their attacking potential is also supported by recent xG figures: 1.60 for the hosts and 1.61 for the visitors, compared with 1.52 and 1.39 xG allowed by their opponents, respectively. The Over 2.5 line also has merit, having landed in 80% of Beitar’s last five matches and 100% of Maccabi’s games; however, Over 1.5 is clearly the safer choice with a projected 3.05 goals. This option is favored due to the high consistency of both attacks and the absence of a clean sheet on either side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Maccabi Petah Tikva win at full-time, as the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals while conceding only 1.0. Over the same period, Beitar have conceded as many as 2.2 goals per match and have allowed opponents to score an average of 1.8 goals after the break, clearly increasing the visitors’ chances of completing a turnaround late in the game. Maccabi were level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with 2 of 5 for Beitar, while both teams averaged just 0.6 goals scored in the first half. The visitors’ advantage is particularly evident after the interval: they won the second half in 60% of their recent appearances and scored an average of 1.4 goals in that period, compared with Beitar’s 0.8. Although the hosts attempt more shots, 21.5 compared with 12.0, their conversion rate is only 7%, whereas Maccabi convert 17% of their attempts, supporting the HT/FT X/2 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Beitar Jerusalem | Maccabi Petah Tikva | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.07 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Maccabi Petah Tikva is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Beitar Jerusalem · 2 pts / game - Maccabi Petah Tikva
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maccabi Petah Tikva is 149% better for: goals scored per game.
0.67 goals / game - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.67 goals / game - Maccabi Petah Tikva
Maccabi Petah Tikva is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.33 goals / game - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.33 goals / game - Maccabi Petah Tikva
Beitar Jerusalem scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Maccabi Petah Tikva keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).
Maccabi Petah Tikva scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Beitar Jerusalem keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beitar Jerusalem
Over / Under - Maccabi Petah Tikva
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maccabi Petah Tikva is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.33 pts / game - Maccabi Petah Tikva
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beitar Jerusalem - second-half results
Allows 1.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Maccabi Petah Tikva - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.3 | 2.7 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 100% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Beitar Jerusalem
Maccabi Petah Tikva
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Beitar Jerusalem | Liga | Maccabi Petah Tikva | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.11 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 59% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 67% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 24% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Beitar Jerusalem 3:1 Maccabi Petah Tikva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva?
Beitar Jerusalem score 0.67 goals per game on average and Maccabi Petah Tikva 1.67. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Beitar Jerusalem's matches and 100% of Maccabi Petah Tikva's.
What form are Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Petah Tikva in?
Over the last 5 games Beitar Jerusalem have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Maccabi Petah Tikva 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Petah Tikva: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


