Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Riga FC II: match statistics

Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Beitar / Riga Mariners play Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Beitar / Riga Mariners: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Riga FC II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Beitar / Riga Mariners scores 2.00 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.62 and concedes 1.77. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Beitar / Riga Mariners 62%, Riga FC II 62%. Over 2.5: Beitar / Riga Mariners 62%, Riga FC II 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Beitar / Riga Mariners has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.36. Beitar / Riga Mariners: 11.9 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.2.

Match halves

Beitar / Riga Mariners: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 1.00. Riga FC II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Beitar / Riga Mariners: 61-75 (7 goals). Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Beitar / Riga Mariners record home xG of 1.9 and average 13 shots per game, 5 on target, whereas Riga FC II register just 0.53 xG away and only 3 shots (2 on target). The hosts have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches and average 2.0 points per game over that span; the visitors have 8 goals in their last 5 overall but average 0 goals per away match and have failed to score in all away fixtures. Defensively, the hosts concede 1.0 goal per home match (xG against 1.05), while the visitors concede 2.0 goals away with xG against 3.03, indicating greater defensive vulnerability on the road. Additionally, the hosts enjoy higher possession (53% vs 46%) and superior shot conversion (~8% vs 0%), translating to better quality chances and game control. Considering the xG 1.9 vs 0.53, 13 shots vs 3 and the hosts’ 2.0 PPG versus the visitors’ 1.2 PPG, I expect a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
7Shots9
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
3Shots on target5
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
1.05xG1.28
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
8Corners5
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
54Dangerous attacks50
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
-1Fouls-1
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
-1Cards-1
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
2Goals scored / match1.62
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
0.92Goals conceded / match1.77
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
49%Average possession45%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
5.62Shots on target / match4.62
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.92Shots per match8.23
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
5.62Shots on target4.62
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
16.8%Shot conversion19.6%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
49%Possession45%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
1.81xG for1.36
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
1.36xG against1.68
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

Shooting quality

Beitar / Riga Mariners: Efficient finishingRiga FC II: Counter-attacking
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)47%56%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 2.4 pts / match - Riga FC II

Beitar / Riga Mariners
DWWWL
Season result split
62% W31% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-1
2.15 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Riga FC II
LWWWW
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 0.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.62 goals / match - Riga FC II

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 92% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.77 goals / match - Riga FC II

Beitar / Riga Mariners scoring profile: very strong

Beitar / Riga Mariners scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Riga FC II scoring profile: strong

Riga FC II scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Beitar / Riga Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

26Goals scored (season)21
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
12Goals conceded (season)23
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
2.92Average goals in match3.38
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
11Goals scored (last 5)10
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal77%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
69%2 goals62%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
23%3 goals15%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
8%4 goals8%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal85%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
31%2 goals62%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
0%3 goals23%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
0%4 goals8%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
Beitar / Riga Mariners - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 13 matches
60%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time38%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
31%Scored in both halves38%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
40%BTTS - last 560%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.92 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.54 pts / match - Riga FC II

Beitar / Riga Mariners - half-time state
54% leading31% draw15% trailing
Riga FC II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.92Points per match (1st half)1.54
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.92
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
0.31Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.54
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
69%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
38%No goal before half-time38%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.69Points per match (2nd half)1.15
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)1.15
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.85
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
62%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II
38%No goal after half-time46%
Beitar / Riga MarinersRiga FC II

Beitar / Riga Mariners - second-half results

46% W31% R23% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga FC II - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Beitar / Riga Mariners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Beitar / Riga Mariners
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
6
2
31-45
3
4
46-60
7
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-68%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Beitar / Riga Mariners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Beitar / Riga MarinersLigaRiga FC II
Average goals in match 2.923.43 3.38
Both teams scored 62%60% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%68% 69%
Clean sheets 38%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Beitar / Riga Mariners 0 - 2 - 0 Riga FC II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Beitar / Riga Mariners
0 : 0
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
1 : 1
FK Beitar / Riga Mariners

FAQ

What was the result of Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Riga FC II?

The 1. Liga match finished Beitar / Riga Mariners 2:2 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Beitar / Riga Mariners and Riga FC II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Beitar / Riga Mariners won 0, Riga FC II won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Riga FC II?

Beitar / Riga Mariners score 2.00 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.62. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's matches and 62% of Riga FC II's.

What form are Beitar / Riga Mariners and Riga FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Beitar / Riga Mariners have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Riga FC II 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Riga FC II?

The statistical background for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Riga FC II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.