Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics
Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Beitar / Riga Mariners played against Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Beitar / Riga Mariners has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Rīgas FS II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Beitar / Riga Mariners scores 2.18 goals per game and allows 0.94. Rīgas FS II scores 1.41 and allows 2.76. Games in this league average 3.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's games and 65% of Rīgas FS II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 76%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Beitar / Riga Mariners has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.38 per game. Beitar / Riga Mariners takes 11.1 shots per game, while Rīgas FS II takes 9.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Beitar / Riga Mariners leads at halftime in 59% of its games and scores 1.06 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.59 after halftime.
When the teams score
Beitar / Riga Mariners's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Rīgas FS II, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.58 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beitar / Riga Mariners sit 3rd in the table with a record of 11 wins, 5 draws and just 1 defeat, while Rīgas FS II are 10th, having lost 10 of their 17 matches. The hosts average 2.00 goals scored at home with an xG of 1.72, whereas the visitors concede as many as 3.25 goals per away game and allow opponents an xG of 1.79. Rīgas FS II have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding 22 goals in the process, while the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 fixtures and scored 12 goals. Beitar also record higher possession at home—54% compared with the visitors’ 48% away from home—and Rīgas FS II fail to score in 50% of their away matches. The strongest argument in favor of the hosts is their clear superiority in the quality of chances created, combined with the visitors’ extremely weak and consistently leaky defense.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - Yes is Rīgas FS II’s very poor defense, as they concede an average of 3.25 goals per game this season and as many as 4.4 goals per match across their last 5 fixtures. Beitar / Riga Mariners are currently scoring 2.4 goals per game, with an average xG of 1.48, so the hosts should create enough chances to exploit their opponents’ defensive problems. The visitors are not reliable in attack, having failed to score in 50% of their matches this season, but the hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 11% of games and concede an average of 2.33 goals. In addition, both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five appearances, significantly above the league average of 64%. A scenario in which both sides score is therefore more likely, although Rīgas FS II’s inconsistent finishing remains a risk to the BTTS - Yes pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile clearly favors goals: the home side surpassed the 1.5-goal mark in 100% of their league matches, while Rīgas FS II did so in 88%. In their last five appearances, Beitar / Riga Mariners averaged 2.4 goals scored, whereas the visitors conceded as many as 4.4 goals per game. The home side’s average xG is 1.47, while their opponents allow an average of 1.79 xG, supporting a projection of around 2.10 goals for the home team. The 2.5 line is also well supported, as both teams went over it in 4 of their last 5 matches; however, Over 1.5 is the safest pick given the high consistency of at least two goals being scored.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Beitar / Riga Mariners have a clear edge in current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 2.4 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, winning 60% of their games, while Rīgas FS II have lost 80% of their matches and allowed opponents to score 4.4 goals per game. The signal for the home side to lead at the break is strong, as they averaged 0.89 goals scored and only 0.44 conceded before half-time, whereas the visitors conceded as many as 1.50 goals during this phase. In their last five appearances, the home side were ahead at half-time in 60% of matches, while the visitors were trailing at the break in 50% of games and conceded an average of 3.0 goals before half-time. After the interval, the quality advantage remains with Beitar: in their last five matches, the hosts averaged 1.0 goal scored and 0.6 conceded, while Rīgas FS II conceded 1.75 goals. The most likely scenario is therefore that the home side will take the lead in the first half and maintain it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Beitar / Riga Mariners | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Beitar / Riga Mariners is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 0.6 pts / game - Rīgas FS II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beitar / Riga Mariners is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
2.18 goals / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.41 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
Beitar / Riga Mariners is 194% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.94 goals / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 2.76 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
Beitar / Riga Mariners scores in 100% of games (17 of 17 meczów), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 meczów).
Rīgas FS II scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 meczów), while Beitar / Riga Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beitar / Riga Mariners
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beitar / Riga Mariners is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.53 pts / game - Rīgas FS II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beitar / Riga Mariners - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 59% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 24%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 3.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Beitar / Riga Mariners
Rīgas FS II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Beitar / Riga Mariners | Liga | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.12 | 3.58 | ▲ 4.18 |
| Both teams scored | • 65% | 64% | • 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 65% | 69% | ▲ 76% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 20% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 85% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Beitar / Riga Mariners's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Rīgas FS II. Games average 4.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Rīgas FS II?
The 1. Liga match finished Beitar / Riga Mariners 3:1 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Beitar / Riga Mariners and Rīgas FS II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Beitar / Riga Mariners won 3, Rīgas FS II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Rīgas FS II?
Beitar / Riga Mariners score 2.18 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.41. The 1. Liga average is 3.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's matches and 65% of Rīgas FS II's.
What form are Beitar / Riga Mariners and Rīgas FS II in?
Over the last 5 games Beitar / Riga Mariners have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Rīgas FS II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


