Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Super Nova II: match statistics
Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Beitar / Riga Mariners played against Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Beitar / Riga Mariners has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Super Nova II has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Beitar / Riga Mariners scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.00. Super Nova II scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's games and 100% of Super Nova II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 100%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 82% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Beitar / Riga Mariners has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 0.84 per game. Beitar / Riga Mariners takes 9.0 shots per game, while Super Nova II takes 5.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Beitar / Riga Mariners leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova II leads at halftime in 100% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Beitar / Riga Mariners's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). For Super Nova II, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.91 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 82% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Beitar / Riga Mariners have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches (avg. 2.8 goals per game) and won 4 of those 5 fixtures (form: wwwlw), while Super Nova II have only 2 goals in their last 5 matches (0.4 per game) and one win in that period. The visitors’ defense looks statistically solid — just 1 conceded goal in the last 5 matches (0.2 per game) versus 6 conceded by the hosts (1.2 per game) — which may limit the margin of the visitors’ defeat. The hosts average 2.4 points per game in their last 5 outings, confirming their ability to convert chances into results, whereas the visitors’ low finishing rate (2 goals in 5) significantly reduces their chances of an away win. Overall, the hosts’ offensive superiority (14 vs 2 goals) and better conversion into points lean me toward a 1 with probability assessment 65%/20%/15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I lean toward BTTS - Yes — the league shows 70% of matches with both teams scoring, and the visitors' last 5 matches show BTTS at 100%. The home side in their last 5 matches averaged 2.8 goals scored (14 goals in 5 matches) and conceded 1.2, while the visitors average 2.0 scored and 1.0 conceded; a 2.8 vs 2.0 (scored) and 1.2 vs 1.0 (conceded) relationship suggests both sides can find the net. Additionally, the home side’s xG in the last 5 matches is 2.07 (xG for) and 2.06 (xG against), which confirms a high level of goal-scoring opportunities on both ends. Season metrics are partially inconsistent (e.g., seasonScoredAVG_away = 0.0), however the home side’s seasonal BTTS is 100% and the league average goals is 3.9 per match, which reinforces the case for BTTS. Considering the league trend of 70%, the visitors’ recent 100% BTTS, and recent goal averages of 2.8 vs 2.0, I assess the probability of BTTS at about 75% versus a 25% 'No Goal' scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Beitar/Riga Mariners average 2.0 goals per season at home (seasonScoredAVG_home=2.0) and as many as 2.8 goals in the last 5 matches (14 goals in 5 games), while conceding 1.2 goals on average in those five matches. Their xG in the last 5 matches is 2.07, whereas Super Nova II show only 2 goals in the last 5 matches (gf_last5_away=2.0) and a season xG of 0.0, suggesting a clear home advantage in chance creation. The league averages 3.9 goals per game, and Beitar’s seasonal metrics show 100% of matches over 1.5 and 100% over 2.5 (seasonOver15Percentage_home=100.0, seasonOver25Percentage_home=100.0), therefore I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at 90% and Over 2.5 at 65%. Due to no seasonal Over 3.5 for the hosts (seasonOver35Percentage_home=0.0) and some volatility, I assign only 30% to Over 3.5, and expected goals are ~1.70 for Beitar and ~0.80 for Super Nova II (total ~2.50), hence the recommendation to play Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Beitar / Riga Mariners hold a clear advantage: they have won 100.0% of their matches and average 3.0 points per game, with 2.0 goals scored per match versus 0.0 for their opponents. They have led at the break in all fixtures so far (100.0% half-time leads), scoring on average 1.0 goal before half-time and conceding none (1.0 vs 0.0). The home side’s xG is 0.84 compared to 0.0 for the guests, and the hosts register an average of 2.0 shots on target per game, corroborating superiority in chance creation. In the last 5 matches the hosts have won 80.0% and led at the break in 60.0%, so the scenario of the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1) is the strongest signal. Therefore I assign a 65% probability to 1/1, while 1/X (10%) and other variants are far less likely due to the visitors’ 0.0 average shooting figures and the lack of indicators that they can stage a turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Beitar / Riga Mariners | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 67% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 1.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Super Nova II is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 2 goals / game - Super Nova II
Beitar / Riga Mariners scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).
Super Nova II scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while Beitar / Riga Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beitar / Riga Mariners
Over / Under - Super Nova II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beitar / Riga Mariners - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Beitar / Riga Mariners
Super Nova II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Beitar / Riga Mariners | Liga | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.00 | 3.91 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 64% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 82% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 100% | 18% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 91% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 91% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Super Nova II?
The 1. Liga match finished Beitar / Riga Mariners 1:1 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Super Nova II?
Beitar / Riga Mariners score 1.00 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 2.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 82% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's matches and 100% of Super Nova II's.
What form are Beitar / Riga Mariners and Super Nova II in?
Over the last 5 games Beitar / Riga Mariners have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Super Nova II 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Super Nova II?
The statistical background for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Super Nova II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


