Bulgaria - Second LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Belasitsa vs Dunav 2010: match statistics

Belasitsa crest
Belasitsa
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Dunav 2010 crest
Dunav 2010
110%(9.50)
X15%(4.75)
275%(1.25)

Dunav 2010 is the clear favorite in this match, sitting in first place in the table with an impressive record of 17 wins and only 3 draws, remaining undefeated. The away team presents a dominant away form with a 78% win rate, a 67% clean sheet rate, and an average of 1.78 goals scored per away game. Belasitsa is in 17th position, having won only 10% of their home matches, failing to score in 60% of their games, and holding a home goal difference of -12. The recent form of both teams also speaks in favor of the visitors - Dunav has collected 13 points in their last 5 matches (4 wins, 1 draw), while Belasitsa has managed only 2 points. The difference in quality, form, and efficiency between both teams is so distinct that a Dunav 2010 victory seems highly probable.

Belasitsa vs Dunav 2010: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Belasitsa play Dunav 2010 in Second League (Bulgaria). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Belasitsa: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Dunav 2010: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Belasitsa scores 0.81 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. Dunav 2010 scores 1.66 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Belasitsa 44%, Dunav 2010 31%. Over 2.5: Belasitsa 50%, Dunav 2010 38%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Dunav 2010 has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.11. Belasitsa: 8.6 shots per match, Dunav 2010: 11.0.

Match halves

Belasitsa: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.44. Dunav 2010: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Belasitsa: 76-90+ (7 goals). Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Dunav 2010 is the clear favorite in this match, sitting in first place in the table with an impressive record of 17 wins and only 3 draws, remaining undefeated. The away team presents a dominant away form with a 78% win rate, a 67% clean sheet rate, and an average of 1.78 goals scored per away game. Belasitsa is in 17th position, having won only 10% of their home matches, failing to score in 60% of their games, and holding a home goal difference of -12. The recent form of both teams also speaks in favor of the visitors - Dunav has collected 13 points in their last 5 matches (4 wins, 1 draw), while Belasitsa has managed only 2 points. The difference in quality, form, and efficiency between both teams is so distinct that a Dunav 2010 victory seems highly probable.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
BelasitsaDunav 2010
9Shots9
BelasitsaDunav 2010
1Shots on target3
BelasitsaDunav 2010
0.88xG1.06
BelasitsaDunav 2010
7Corners2
BelasitsaDunav 2010
32Dangerous attacks39
BelasitsaDunav 2010
-1Fouls-1
BelasitsaDunav 2010
-1Cards-1
BelasitsaDunav 2010

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BelasitsaDunav 2010
0.81Goals scored / match1.66
BelasitsaDunav 2010
1.94Goals conceded / match0.5
BelasitsaDunav 2010
46%Average possession50%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
4.69Shots on target / match6.13
BelasitsaDunav 2010

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.59Shots per match11.03
BelasitsaDunav 2010
4.69Shots on target6.13
BelasitsaDunav 2010
9.5%Shot conversion15%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
46%Possession50%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
1.11xG for1.44
BelasitsaDunav 2010
1.77xG against1.02
BelasitsaDunav 2010

Shooting quality

Belasitsa: BalancedDunav 2010: Efficient finishing
BelasitsaDunav 2010
Accuracy (shots on target)55%56%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dunav 2010 is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Belasitsa · 1.4 pts / match - Dunav 2010

Belasitsa
LWLLL
Season result split
13% W22% R66% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-21
0.59 pts / match · goal difference -36
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-9
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Dunav 2010
LWDLW
Season result split
63% W28% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-3
2.16 pts / match · goal difference +37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dunav 2010 is 105% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Belasitsa · 1.66 goals / match - Dunav 2010

Dunav 2010 is 288% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.94 goals / match - Belasitsa · 0.5 goals / match - Dunav 2010

Belasitsa scoring profile: more difficult

Belasitsa scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 63% (20 of 32 matches).

Dunav 2010 scoring profile: very strong

Dunav 2010 scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while Belasitsa keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).

26Goals scored (season)53
BelasitsaDunav 2010
62Goals conceded (season)16
BelasitsaDunav 2010
2.75Average goals in match2.16
BelasitsaDunav 2010
6Goals scored (last 5)8
BelasitsaDunav 2010
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
BelasitsaDunav 2010

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal78%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
16%2 goals63%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
9%3 goals19%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
0%4 goals6%
BelasitsaDunav 2010

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal38%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
56%2 goals9%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
34%3 goals3%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
13%4 goals0%
BelasitsaDunav 2010

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time6%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
6%BTTS in both halves0%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
6%Scored in both halves41%
BelasitsaDunav 2010

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
60%BTTS - last 560%
BelasitsaDunav 2010

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
BelasitsaDunav 2010

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
BelasitsaDunav 2010

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dunav 2010 is 186% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.69 pts / match - Belasitsa · 1.97 pts / match - Dunav 2010

Belasitsa - half-time state
6% leading50% draw44% trailing
Dunav 2010 - half-time state
53% leading38% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.69Points per match (1st half)1.97
BelasitsaDunav 2010
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.78
BelasitsaDunav 2010
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.16
BelasitsaDunav 2010
1.25Average goals (1st half)0.94
BelasitsaDunav 2010
38%Clean sheet before half-time84%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
72%No goal before half-time44%
BelasitsaDunav 2010

After half-time (2nd half)

0.84Points per match (2nd half)1.91
BelasitsaDunav 2010
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
BelasitsaDunav 2010
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.34
BelasitsaDunav 2010
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.22
BelasitsaDunav 2010
41%Clean sheet after half-time75%
BelasitsaDunav 2010
66%No goal after half-time38%
BelasitsaDunav 2010

Belasitsa - second-half results

16% W38% R47% P
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-20
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dunav 2010 - second-half results

53% W31% R16% P
63
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Belasitsa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Dunav 2010 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Belasitsa
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
5
12
16-30
5
8
31-45
3
10
46-60
4
12
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Dunav 2010
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
8
1
16-30
7
1
31-45
7
1
46-60
8
2
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Belasitsa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
181%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Dunav 2010

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

BelasitsaLigaDunav 2010
Average goals in match 2.752.52 2.16
Both teams scored 44%46% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%46% 38%
Clean sheets 19%32% 63%
Goal before half-time 69%70% 66%
Goal after half-time 75%73% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Belasitsa 0 - 0 - 1 Dunav 2010. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Dunav 2010 Ruse
3 : 0
Belasitsa

FAQ

What was the result of Belasitsa vs Dunav 2010?

The Second League match finished Belasitsa 1:2 Dunav 2010. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Belasitsa vs Dunav 2010?

Belasitsa score 0.81 goals per game on average and Dunav 2010 1.66. The Second League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Belasitsa's matches and 31% of Dunav 2010's.

What form are Belasitsa and Dunav 2010 in?

Over the last 5 games Belasitsa have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Dunav 2010 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Belasitsa vs Dunav 2010?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Belasitsa vs Dunav 2010: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.