Bellinzona vs Wil: match statistics
Bellinzona vs Wil: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bellinzona played against Wil in Challenge League (Switzerland). The game was played on December 20, 2025. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Bellinzona has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Wil has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Bellinzona scores 0.76 goals per game and allows 1.94. Wil scores 0.82 and allows 1.65. Games in this league average 2.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 35% of Bellinzona's games and 53% of Wil's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 53%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wil has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 1.16 per game. Bellinzona takes 10.1 shots per game, while Wil takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Bellinzona leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.29 goals per game after halftime. Wil leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.41 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bellinzona's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Wil, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Challenge League games average 2.82 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bellinzona | Wil | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Wil is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Bellinzona · 1.6 pts / game - Wil
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wil is 8% better for: goals scored per game.
0.76 goals / game - Bellinzona · 0.82 goals / game - Wil
Wil is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.94 goals / game - Bellinzona · 1.65 goals / game - Wil
Bellinzona scores in 41% of games (7 of 17 meczów), while Wil keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 meczów).
Wil scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while Bellinzona keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bellinzona
Over / Under - Wil
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wil is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.82 pts / game - Bellinzona · 1.18 pts / game - Wil
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bellinzona - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 12%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Wil - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bellinzona
Wil
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Challenge League).
Teams vs league
| Bellinzona | Liga | Wil | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.71 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 53% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 56% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 69% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 82% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Bellinzona's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Wil. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Bellinzona vs Wil?
The Challenge League match finished Bellinzona 0:2 Wil. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bellinzona vs Wil?
Bellinzona score 0.76 goals per game on average and Wil 0.82. The Challenge League average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Bellinzona's matches and 53% of Wil's.
What form are Bellinzona and Wil in?
Over the last 5 games Bellinzona have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Wil 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bellinzona vs Wil?
The statistical background for Bellinzona vs Wil — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.