Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 23 July 2026

Beltinci vs Rudar: match statistics

Beltinci crest
Beltinci
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Rudar crest
Rudar
155%(0.00)
X27%(0.00)
218%(0.00)

Beltinci presents a solid home form with a 44% win rate and an impressive +10 goal difference in their home matches. The hosts average 2.22 goals per home game while conceding just 1.11, confirming their offensive superiority. Rudar has a problematic away record with a 44% loss rate and only a 33% win rate, conceding an average of 1.56 goals on the road. The recent form of both teams is similar (2.0 vs 1.6 PPG), but Beltinci's home advantage and higher offensive efficiency (xG 1.96 vs 1.43) tip the scales in the hosts' favor. The difference in ball possession (58% vs 49%) and a better shot conversion rate further support the prediction of a Beltinci win, though their inconsistent home form (ldwwwllwd) leaves room for a draw.

Beltinci vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Beltinci play Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Beltinci: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Rudar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Beltinci scores 1.83 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.53 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Beltinci 47%, Rudar 53%. Over 2.5: Beltinci 53%, Rudar 60%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Beltinci has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.51. Beltinci: 13.4 shots per match, Rudar: 10.4.

Match halves

Beltinci: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.97. Rudar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Beltinci: 76-90+ (12 goals). Rudar: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Beltinci presents a solid home form with a 44% win rate and an impressive +10 goal difference in their home matches. The hosts average 2.22 goals per home game while conceding just 1.11, confirming their offensive superiority. Rudar has a problematic away record with a 44% loss rate and only a 33% win rate, conceding an average of 1.56 goals on the road. The recent form of both teams is similar (2.0 vs 1.6 PPG), but Beltinci's home advantage and higher offensive efficiency (xG 1.96 vs 1.43) tip the scales in the hosts' favor. The difference in ball possession (58% vs 49%) and a better shot conversion rate further support the prediction of a Beltinci win, though their inconsistent home form (ldwwwllwd) leaves room for a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
BeltinciRudar
12Shots11
BeltinciRudar
6Shots on target2
BeltinciRudar
1.7xG1.28
BeltinciRudar
2Corners2
BeltinciRudar
72Dangerous attacks61
BeltinciRudar
-1Fouls-1
BeltinciRudar
-1Cards-1
BeltinciRudar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.83Goals scored / match1.53
BeltinciRudar
0.83Goals conceded / match1.3
BeltinciRudar
55%Average possession50%
BeltinciRudar
5.47Shots on target / match4.4
BeltinciRudar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.4Shots per match10.37
BeltinciRudar
5.47Shots on target4.4
BeltinciRudar
13.7%Shot conversion14.8%
BeltinciRudar
55%Possession50%
BeltinciRudar
1.74xG for1.51
BeltinciRudar
1.11xG against1.5
BeltinciRudar

Shooting quality

Beltinci: Efficient finishingRudar: Efficient finishing
BeltinciRudar
Accuracy (shots on target)41%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Beltinci is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Beltinci · 1.4 pts / match - Rudar

Beltinci
WWLLW
Season result split
60% W20% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-6-6
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Rudar
WWLDL
Season result split
30% W33% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-11
1.23 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Beltinci is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - Beltinci · 1.53 goals / match - Rudar

Beltinci is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Beltinci · 1.3 goals / match - Rudar

Beltinci scoring profile: very strong

Beltinci scores in 87% of matches (26 of 30 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

Rudar scoring profile: mixed

Rudar scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Beltinci keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).

55Goals scored (season)46
BeltinciRudar
25Goals conceded (season)39
BeltinciRudar
2.67Average goals in match2.83
BeltinciRudar
10Goals scored (last 5)9
BeltinciRudar
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
BeltinciRudar

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal70%
BeltinciRudar
60%2 goals47%
BeltinciRudar
27%3 goals20%
BeltinciRudar
7%4 goals10%
BeltinciRudar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal70%
BeltinciRudar
23%2 goals43%
BeltinciRudar
10%3 goals13%
BeltinciRudar
0%4 goals3%
BeltinciRudar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time20%
BeltinciRudar
3%BTTS in both halves7%
BeltinciRudar
40%Scored in both halves20%
BeltinciRudar

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
BeltinciRudar
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
BeltinciRudar
60%BTTS - last 560%
BeltinciRudar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
BeltinciRudar
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
BeltinciRudar
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
BeltinciRudar

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
BeltinciRudar
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
BeltinciRudar
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
BeltinciRudar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beltinci is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - Beltinci · 1.4 pts / match - Rudar

Beltinci - half-time state
50% leading30% draw20% trailing
Rudar - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)1.4
BeltinciRudar
0.87Goals scored (1st half)0.73
BeltinciRudar
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
BeltinciRudar
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.3
BeltinciRudar
73%Clean sheet before half-time57%
BeltinciRudar
40%No goal before half-time57%
BeltinciRudar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.77Points per match (2nd half)1.17
BeltinciRudar
0.97Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
BeltinciRudar
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
BeltinciRudar
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.4
BeltinciRudar
67%Clean sheet after half-time50%
BeltinciRudar
33%No goal after half-time57%
BeltinciRudar

Beltinci - second-half results

47% W37% R17% P
54
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudar - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
42
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Beltinci - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Beltinci
ScoredConceded
10
1
0-15
8
6
16-30
8
5
31-45
9
3
46-60
8
6
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
9
8
16-30
9
5
31-45
1
5
46-60
10
7
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Beltinci

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

BeltinciLigaRudar
Average goals in match 2.672.82 2.83
Both teams scored 47%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%54% 60%
Clean sheets 50%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 73%74% 67%
Goal after half-time 77%81% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Beltinci 0 - 1 - 0 Rudar. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

NK Rudar Velenje
2 : 2
ND Beltinci

FAQ

What was the result of Beltinci vs Rudar?

The 2. SNL match finished Beltinci 2:1 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Beltinci vs Rudar?

Beltinci score 1.83 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.53. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Beltinci's matches and 53% of Rudar's.

What form are Beltinci and Rudar in?

Over the last 5 games Beltinci have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Rudar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beltinci vs Rudar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.