Bendel Insurance vs Kun Khalifat: match statistics
Bendel Insurance presents a decisive edge in home matches, winning 50% of their home fixtures with a mere 7% loss rate. The hosts score an average of 1.57 goals per game at home and maintain a 50% clean sheet rate, demonstrating a solid defense. Kun Khalifat has very poor away statistics - winning only 7% of away games, failing to score in half of their fixtures (FTS% 50%), and averaging just 0.57 goals scored. The difference in expected goals (xG) is clear: the hosts generate 1.74 xG at home, while the visitors manage only 0.93 on the road. The visitors' away goal difference is -11, confirming their struggles away from home. Considering all statistics, Bendel Insurance has very high chances of securing a victory in front of their home crowd.
Bendel Insurance vs Kun Khalifat: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Bendel Insurance played against Kun Khalifat in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Bendel Insurance has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Kun Khalifat has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Bendel Insurance scores 1.17 goals per game and allows 0.93. Kun Khalifat scores 0.86 and allows 1.10. Games in this league average 1.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of Bendel Insurance's games and 45% of Kun Khalifat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 28% and 28%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Bendel Insurance has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.15 per game. Bendel Insurance takes 8.3 shots per game, while Kun Khalifat takes 5.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Bendel Insurance leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.48 goals per game after halftime. Kun Khalifat leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
Bendel Insurance's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). For Kun Khalifat, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.87 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bendel Insurance presents a decisive edge in home matches, winning 50% of their home fixtures with a mere 7% loss rate. The hosts score an average of 1.57 goals per game at home and maintain a 50% clean sheet rate, demonstrating a solid defense. Kun Khalifat has very poor away statistics - winning only 7% of away games, failing to score in half of their fixtures (FTS% 50%), and averaging just 0.57 goals scored. The difference in expected goals (xG) is clear: the hosts generate 1.74 xG at home, while the visitors manage only 0.93 on the road. The visitors' away goal difference is -11, confirming their struggles away from home. Considering all statistics, Bendel Insurance has very high chances of securing a victory in front of their home crowd.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Bendel Insurance | Kun Khalifat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.22 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.58 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kun Khalifat is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Bendel Insurance · 2 pts / game - Kun Khalifat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bendel Insurance is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
1.17 goals / game - Bendel Insurance · 0.86 goals / game - Kun Khalifat
Bendel Insurance is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.93 goals / game - Bendel Insurance · 1.1 goals / game - Kun Khalifat
Bendel Insurance scores in 66% of games (19 of 29 meczów), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 meczów).
Kun Khalifat scores in 66% of games (19 of 29 meczów), while Bendel Insurance keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bendel Insurance
Over / Under - Kun Khalifat
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bendel Insurance is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / game - Bendel Insurance · 1.17 pts / game - Kun Khalifat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bendel Insurance - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 34%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kun Khalifat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Bendel Insurance
Kun Khalifat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Bendel Insurance | Liga | Kun Khalifat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.10 | 1.87 | • 1.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 41% | 36% | ▲ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 28% | 27% | • 28% |
| Clean sheets | • 38% | 38% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 61% | • 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 62% | 60% | ▲ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Bendel Insurance's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Kun Khalifat. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Bendel Insurance vs Kun Khalifat?
The NPFL match finished Bendel Insurance 2:1 Kun Khalifat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bendel Insurance vs Kun Khalifat?
Bendel Insurance score 1.17 goals per game on average and Kun Khalifat 0.86. The NPFL average is 1.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Bendel Insurance's matches and 45% of Kun Khalifat's.
What form are Bendel Insurance and Kun Khalifat in?
Over the last 5 games Bendel Insurance have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kun Khalifat 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bendel Insurance vs Kun Khalifat?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.