Nigeria - NPFLUniben Sport ComplexData current as of 16 July 2026

Bendel Insurance vs Remo Stars: match statistics

Bendel Insurance crest
Bendel Insurance
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Remo Stars crest
Remo Stars

Bendel Insurance vs Remo Stars: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bendel Insurance play Remo Stars in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Uniben Sport Complex. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Bendel Insurance: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Remo Stars: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bendel Insurance scores 1.16 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Remo Stars scores 1.11 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bendel Insurance 45%, Remo Stars 55%. Over 2.5: Bendel Insurance 34%, Remo Stars 45%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Bendel Insurance has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.37. Bendel Insurance: 6.9 shots per match, Remo Stars: 7.5.

Match halves

Bendel Insurance: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.50. Remo Stars: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Bendel Insurance: 0-15 (9 goals). Remo Stars: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Bendel Insurance holds a clear advantage in the table (6th vs 16th Remo Stars) and at home scores an average of 1.56 goals per match with xG 1.77, while Remo averages only 0.61 goals away with xG 0.99. The hosts generate significantly more chances: on average 12.85 shots and 5 on target per home game versus 6.5 shots and 2.42 on target for the visitors, with similar conversion rates (10% vs 9%), which translates into a greater number of genuine opportunities. Defensively Bendel concedes only 0.67 goals at home and has 50% clean sheets, whereas Remo concedes 1.78 goals away and has no clean sheets on the road, with an away loss rate of 89%. Differences in offensive efficacy are also evident: Bendel fail to score in only 17% of home matches, while Remo are goalless in 44% of their away games, making a comeback difficult for the visitors. Considering the xG advantage (1.77 vs 0.99), higher shot volume (12.85 vs 6.5) and substantially superior home defence, I forecast a Bendel Insurance win 70%, draw 18% and Remo Stars win 12%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
-1Shots-1
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
-1Shots on target-1
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
0xG0
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
-1Corners-1
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
0Dangerous attacks0
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
-1Fouls-1
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
-1Cards-1
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
1.16Goals scored / match1.11
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
1Goals conceded / match1.24
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
33%Average possession39%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
2.39Shots on target / match3.24
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.89Shots per match7.55
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
2.39Shots on target3.24
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
16.8%Shot conversion14.6%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
33%Possession39%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
1.5xG for1.37
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
1.32xG against1.17
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

Shooting quality

Bendel Insurance: Counter-attackingRemo Stars: Counter-attacking
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
Accuracy (shots on target)35%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.490.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bendel Insurance is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Bendel Insurance · 1.4 pts / match - Remo Stars

Bendel Insurance
WWWLD
Season result split
37% W37% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-14-10
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-8-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.70Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Remo Stars
LWLWD
Season result split
37% W13% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-19
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-16
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bendel Insurance is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - Bendel Insurance · 1.11 goals / match - Remo Stars

Bendel Insurance is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Bendel Insurance · 1.24 goals / match - Remo Stars

Bendel Insurance scoring profile: very strong

Bendel Insurance scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 matches).

Remo Stars scoring profile: strong

Remo Stars scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Bendel Insurance keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

44Goals scored (season)42
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
38Goals conceded (season)47
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
2.16Average goals in match2.34
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal76%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
32%2 goals29%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
13%3 goals5%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
3%4 goals0%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal79%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
26%2 goals32%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
8%3 goals11%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
3%4 goals3%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
Bendel Insurance - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 38 matches
38%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time26%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
21%Scored in both halves11%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
60%BTTS - last 580%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bendel Insurance is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.34 pts / match - Bendel Insurance · 1 pts / match - Remo Stars

Bendel Insurance - half-time state
24% leading63% draw13% trailing
Remo Stars - half-time state
16% leading53% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.34Points per match (1st half)1
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
0.66Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.11
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
63%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
53%No goal before half-time61%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
58%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars
58%No goal after half-time53%
Bendel InsuranceRemo Stars

Bendel Insurance - second-half results

29% W39% R32% P
51
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.34
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Remo Stars - second-half results

37% W29% R34% P
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bendel Insurance - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Remo Stars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bendel Insurance
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
9
3
16-30
7
10
31-45
8
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Remo Stars
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
1
7
16-30
11
8
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
5
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+122%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bendel Insurance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
172%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Remo Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
191%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Bendel InsuranceLigaRemo Stars
Average goals in match 2.162.02 2.34
Both teams scored 45%38% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 34%34% 45%
Clean sheets 37%37% 21%
Goal before half-time 58%61% 66%
Goal after half-time 68%64% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Bendel Insurance 1 - 0 - 0 Remo Stars. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Bendel Insurance vs Remo Stars?

The NPFL match finished Bendel Insurance 1:1 Remo Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bendel Insurance vs Remo Stars?

Bendel Insurance score 1.16 goals per game on average and Remo Stars 1.11. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Bendel Insurance's matches and 55% of Remo Stars's.

What form are Bendel Insurance and Remo Stars in?

Over the last 5 games Bendel Insurance have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Remo Stars 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bendel Insurance vs Remo Stars?

The statistical background for Bendel Insurance vs Remo Stars — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.