Benjamin Aceval vs Fernando de la Mora: match statistics
Benjamin Aceval vs Fernando de la Mora: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Benjamin Aceval played against Fernando de la Mora in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Benjamin Aceval has 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.67 points per game. Fernando de la Mora has 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Benjamin Aceval scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 0.33. Fernando de la Mora scores 0.00 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.39 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Benjamin Aceval's games and 0% of Fernando de la Mora's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 0%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Benjamin Aceval has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.40 per game. Benjamin Aceval takes 13.7 shots per game, while Fernando de la Mora takes 10.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Benjamin Aceval leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Fernando de la Mora leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Benjamin Aceval's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Fernando de la Mora, it is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Division Intermedia games average 2.39 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Benjamin Aceval has a form of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (wlwdd) in the last 5 matches and has scored 7 goals, whereas Fernando de la Mora have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses (dllll) in their last 5 with only 1 goal. At home the hosts average 11 shots and 6 on target with an average xG of 1.67, while the visitors on the road register just 3 shots, 0 on target and xG 0.65, indicating a clear home advantage in quality of chances. The hosts’ defensive profile looks solid by the numbers — 100% of home matches with a clean sheet and an average of 0 goals conceded per home match — whereas Fernando de la Mora concede on average 2 goals away and have shipped 9 goals in their last 5 matches. Additionally the hosts have 51% possession versus 41% for the visitors and average 1.6 points in the last 5 matches compared to 0.2 for their opponents, indicating better control and form. Considering the xG difference (1.67 vs 0.65), the superiority in shots (11 vs 3) and the visitors’ goal-scoring issues (0 goals away and 100% of away matches without scoring), I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The data strongly favors No BTTS: Fernando de la Mora has a seasonal goals average of 0.0 (0 goals this season) and only 1 goal in the last 5 matches (0.2 per match). Benjamin Aceval possesses a markedly better attack — xG 1.78 seasonally and 1.49 in the last 5, with 7 goals in the last 5 (1.4 average) — so the hosts are most likely to score. The visitors have a very weak offense: xG 0.65, averaging 3 shots per match and 0 on target, while conceding roughly 1.8–2.0 goals per match (9 conceded in the last 5), which lowers the chance they will reply with a goal. Additionally, the seasonal BTTS rates for both teams are 0%, while the league BTTS average is 46%, indicating these teams rarely play matches where both score this season. Considering the above numbers I assess BTTS probability at about 25% and No BTTS at 75%, therefore I recommend selecting "No" as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive averages analysis indicates a combined expected goal total of approximately 2.98: Benjamin Aceval has an attacking xG of 1.78 versus 0.65 for Fernando de la Mora, while the away defense concedes an xG against of 1.98, yielding calculated expected goals of 1.88 for the home side and 1.10 for the visitors. The hosts average 14.5 shots per match with 3.5 on target, whereas the visitors register only 3.0 shots and 0.0 on target, increasing the likelihood of chances for Benjamin (14.5 vs 3.0; 3.5 vs 0.0). In the last 5 matches Benjamin scored 7 goals (1.4 per match) and Fernando only 1 (0.2 per match); the hosts also had 60% of games over 2.5 in that period versus 20% for the visitors. With an expected 2.98 goals (above the league average of 2.42) the distribution suggests roughly an 80% probability for Over 1.5, ~57% for Over 2.5 and ~35% for Over 3.5; therefore the strongest data-driven signal is a play on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a Half-Time draw and a Home win (X/1). Both teams drew at the break in 60% of their last five matches, increasing the likelihood of a stalemate after 45 minutes. The home side holds a clear offensive advantage: xG 1.78 versus 0.65, an average of 14.5 shots versus 3.0 and 3.5 shots on target versus 0.0 for the visitors, so they are more likely to take the initiative after half-time. Additionally, the hosts have won 40% of their last five matches compared to 0% for the away team, and over their last five fixtures the home team conceded an average of 1.0 goals versus 1.8 for the visitors, which supports a final victory for the hosts. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the X/1 scenario (38%), followed by X/X (25%) and 1/1 (15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Benjamin Aceval | Fernando de la Mora | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Benjamin Aceval is 406% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.33 goals / game - Benjamin Aceval · 1.67 goals / game - Fernando de la Mora
Benjamin Aceval scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Fernando de la Mora keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).
Fernando de la Mora scores in 0% of games (0 of 3 games), while Benjamin Aceval keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Benjamin Aceval
Over / Under - Fernando de la Mora
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Benjamin Aceval is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Benjamin Aceval · 0.67 pts / game - Fernando de la Mora
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Benjamin Aceval - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Fernando de la Mora - second-half results
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 100% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Benjamin Aceval
Fernando de la Mora
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| Benjamin Aceval | Liga | Fernando de la Mora | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.39 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 46% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 36% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 32% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 54% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Benjamin Aceval vs Fernando de la Mora?
The Division Intermedia match finished Benjamin Aceval 0:1 Fernando de la Mora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Benjamin Aceval vs Fernando de la Mora?
Benjamin Aceval score 1.67 goals per game on average and Fernando de la Mora 0.00. The Division Intermedia average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Benjamin Aceval's matches and 0% of Fernando de la Mora's.
What form are Benjamin Aceval and Fernando de la Mora in?
Over the last 5 games Benjamin Aceval have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Fernando de la Mora 0-0-3 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Benjamin Aceval vs Fernando de la Mora?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


