Blooming vs ABB: match statistics
Blooming vs ABB: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Blooming played against ABB in LFPB (Bolivia). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Estadio Ramón Aguilera Costas. Final score: 6:1.
Recent form
Blooming has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. ABB has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Blooming scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 1.11. ABB scores 1.61 and allows 2.06. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Blooming's games and 78% of ABB's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 72%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
ABB has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.42 per game. Blooming takes 13.4 shots per game, while ABB takes 14.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Blooming leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. ABB leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
Blooming's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For ABB, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LFPB games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Blooming remain unbeaten at home, winning 44% of their matches and drawing 56%, while ABB have lost as many as 78% of their away fixtures. At home, the hosts average 1.56 goals with an xG of 1.60, whereas the visitors concede as many as 2.67 goals per match away from home and have kept no clean sheets. Blooming’s home defense looks significantly more reliable, allowing just 0.44 goals per game and recording a clean sheet in 56% of matches, although their xG against stands at 1.30. Both teams have been in poor overall form, with Blooming taking 2 points from their last five league matches and ABB 4, but home advantage and the visitors’ extremely weak away defense clearly favor the hosts. A draw remains a realistic outcome given Blooming’s 56% home draw rate, but a home win is the most likely result.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear: BTTS occurred in 67% of Blooming’s matches this season and as many as 89% of ABB’s matches, compared with the league average of 63%. ABB have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, while Blooming score 2.00 goals at home with an xG of 1.74. The hosts are also defensively vulnerable, having conceded 12 goals in their last 5 matches—2.4 per game—while ABB averaged 1.4 goals scored during this period. The current BTTS figures from the last five matches—80% for Blooming and 60% for ABB—further support the scenario in which both sides find the net. The “Yes” pick is stronger, although the risk lies in Blooming’s weaker finishing in their last five matches, during which they scored only 5 goals.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Blooming scores an average of 2.00 goals per home game, while ABB concedes as many as 2.67 goals away from home, clearly favoring goals for the hosts. Their attacking potential is supported by xG: 1.74 for Blooming compared with ABB’s average of 1.82 xG conceded, while the visitors create 1.36 xG against 1.29 xG allowed by the hosts. At least two goals were scored in 89% of Blooming’s matches and in all of ABB’s games, while Over 2.5 goals occurred in 67% and 78% of cases, respectively. The last five matches for both teams also highlight defensive weaknesses, with Blooming conceding an average of 2.4 goals and ABB 2.0. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the broad seasonal data and the current vulnerability of both defenses significantly reduce the likelihood of a match finishing with a maximum of one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Blooming has a clear edge in the season’s results: they win 56% of their matches, while ABB have lost as many as 78%, with the home side averaging 1.78 points compared with just 0.44 for their opponents. The opening stages could nevertheless be closely contested, as Blooming have been level at half-time in 3 of 9 matches and in as many as 60% of their last five fixtures, while averaging only 0.6 goals before the break. After the interval, the arguments strongly favor the hosts: they score an average of 1.22 goals in the second half, whereas ABB concede 1.56, have not won a single second-half segment this season and have a -9 goal difference in that period. The visitors’ defense is particularly vulnerable under pressure, with ABB conceding an average of 2.67 goals per match and keeping no clean sheets. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a Blooming win best combines the hosts’ more cautious recent first halves with their substantial advantage in quality and attacking efficiency after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Blooming | ABB | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Blooming is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Blooming · 0.8 pts / game - ABB
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
ABB is 26% better for: goals scored per game.
1.28 goals / game - Blooming · 1.61 goals / game - ABB
Blooming is 86% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.11 goals / game - Blooming · 2.06 goals / game - ABB
Blooming scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 games), while ABB keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 games).
ABB scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 games), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blooming
Over / Under - ABB
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.78 pts / game - Blooming · 1.33 pts / game - ABB
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 28%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
ABB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Blooming
ABB
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Blooming | Liga | ABB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.39 | 3.05 | ▲ 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 61% | ▲ 78% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 62% | ▲ 72% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 23% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 74% | ▲ 89% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Blooming's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against ABB. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Blooming vs ABB?
The LFPB match finished Blooming 6:1 ABB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Blooming and ABB?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Blooming won 1, ABB won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Blooming vs ABB?
Blooming score 1.28 goals per game on average and ABB 1.61. The LFPB average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Blooming's matches and 78% of ABB's.
What form are Blooming and ABB in?
Over the last 5 games Blooming have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and ABB 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blooming vs ABB?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


