Blooming vs Aurora: match statistics
Blooming vs Aurora: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Blooming played against Aurora in LFPB (Bolivia). The game was played on December 10, 2025. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Blooming has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Aurora has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Blooming scores 1.82 goals per game and allows 1.93. Aurora scores 1.75 and allows 2.11. Games in this league average 3.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 68% of Blooming's games and 75% of Aurora's. The Over 2.5 rates are 79% and 71%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Aurora has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.62 per game. Blooming takes 14.9 shots per game, while Aurora takes 16.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Blooming leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Aurora leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.96 after halftime.
When the teams score
Blooming's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (14 goals). For Aurora, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LFPB games average 3.56 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Blooming | Aurora | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Blooming is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.93 goals / game - Blooming · 2.11 goals / game - Aurora
Blooming scores in 82% of games (23 of 28 meczów), while Aurora keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 meczów).
Aurora scores in 86% of games (24 of 28 meczów), while Blooming keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Blooming
Over / Under - Aurora
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Blooming is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Blooming · 1.18 pts / game - Aurora
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Blooming - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Aurora - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Blooming
Aurora
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| Blooming | Liga | Aurora | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.75 | 3.56 | ▲ 3.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 65% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 79% | 65% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 20% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 80% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | • 89% | 88% | • 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Blooming's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Aurora. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Blooming vs Aurora?
The LFPB match finished Blooming 2:1 Aurora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Blooming vs Aurora?
Blooming score 1.82 goals per game on average and Aurora 1.75. The LFPB average is 3.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Blooming's matches and 75% of Aurora's.
What form are Blooming and Aurora in?
Over the last 5 games Blooming have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Aurora 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Blooming vs Aurora?
The statistical background for Blooming vs Aurora — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.