Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Borneo vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

Borneo crest
Borneo
2 : 1half-time 1:0
PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta
155%(1.65)
X27%(3.60)
218%(4.40)

Borneo displays impressive home form with an 89% win rate at home and only one defeat at their own stadium this season. The hosts boast a superior goal difference (+13 in home matches) and a higher average goals scored (1.89 vs 1.33). PSIM Yogyakarta, despite a solid away form (44% wins), struggles with efficiency – failing to score in 33% of away matches. The difference in Expected Goals (xG 1.82 vs 1.55) further favors the hosts. The recent form of both teams is balanced (1.4 vs 1.6 PPG), however, Borneo's home advantage and Clean Sheet statistics (56%) suggest control over the match proceedings. Considering all factors, a home win is the most likely scenario, although the visitors' solid defense (44% CS%) could make it a closely contested match.

Borneo vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Borneo play PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 1 February 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Borneo: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. PSIM Yogyakarta: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Borneo scores 2.18 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.26 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Borneo 59%, PSIM Yogyakarta 53%. Over 2.5: Borneo 62%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Borneo has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.57. Borneo: 13.9 shots per match, PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.2.

Match halves

Borneo: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.32. PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Borneo: 76-90+ (24 goals). PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Borneo displays impressive home form with an 89% win rate at home and only one defeat at their own stadium this season. The hosts boast a superior goal difference (+13 in home matches) and a higher average goals scored (1.89 vs 1.33). PSIM Yogyakarta, despite a solid away form (44% wins), struggles with efficiency – failing to score in 33% of away matches. The difference in Expected Goals (xG 1.82 vs 1.55) further favors the hosts. The recent form of both teams is balanced (1.4 vs 1.6 PPG), however, Borneo's home advantage and Clean Sheet statistics (56%) suggest control over the match proceedings. Considering all factors, a home win is the most likely scenario, although the visitors' solid defense (44% CS%) could make it a closely contested match.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
22Shots12
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
7Shots on target5
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
2.05xG1.25
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
7Corners4
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
26Dangerous attacks21
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
8Fouls8
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
1Cards1
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
2.18Goals scored / match1.26
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
0.91Goals conceded / match1.29
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
53%Average possession59%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
5.32Shots on target / match4.41
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.91Shots per match13.18
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
5.32Shots on target4.41
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
15.6%Shot conversion9.6%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
53%Possession59%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
1.64xG for1.57
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
1.53xG against1.42
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Borneo: Efficient finishingPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Borneo is 117% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Borneo · 1.2 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Borneo
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
74% W12% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
25-4-5
2.32 pts / match · goal difference +43
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
15-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
PSIM Yogyakarta
LLWWL
Season result split
32% W35% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-11
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Borneo is 73% better for: goals scored per match.

2.18 goals / match - Borneo · 1.26 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Borneo is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Borneo · 1.29 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Borneo scoring profile: very strong

Borneo scores in 91% of matches (31 of 34 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Borneo keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

74Goals scored (season)43
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
31Goals conceded (season)44
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
3.09Average goals in match2.56
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
13Goals scored (last 5)5
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal74%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
65%2 goals38%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
35%3 goals12%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
12%4 goals3%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal71%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
21%2 goals41%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
6%3 goals15%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
0%4 goals3%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time18%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
6%BTTS in both halves6%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
47%Scored in both halves18%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
40%BTTS - last 540%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Borneo is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - Borneo · 1.18 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Borneo - half-time state
44% leading38% draw18% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.18
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.47
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
1.24Average goals (1st half)0.97
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
65%Clean sheet before half-time56%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
38%No goal before half-time65%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

2.09Points per match (2nd half)1.38
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
1.32Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
1.85Average goals (2nd half)1.59
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
56%Clean sheet after half-time47%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta
24%No goal after half-time44%
BorneoPSIM Yogyakarta

Borneo - second-half results

62% W24% R15% P
58
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
71
Second-half points
+27
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding168%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 74%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

35% W32% R32% P
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Borneo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+4+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Borneo
ScoredConceded
11
3
0-15
10
6
16-30
8
4
31-45
9
3
46-60
12
5
61-75
24
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (24 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
6
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Borneo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

BorneoLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals in match 3.092.80 2.56
Both teams scored 59%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%54% 50%
Clean sheets 35%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%72% 62%
Goal after half-time 88%81% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Borneo 1 - 0 - 0 PSIM Yogyakarta. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

PSIM Yogyakarta
1 : 3
Borneo

FAQ

What was the result of Borneo vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Borneo 2:1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Borneo vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Borneo score 2.18 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.26. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Borneo's matches and 53% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Borneo and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Borneo have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Borneo vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Borneo vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.