Uruguay - Primera DivisiónData current as of 16 July 2026

Boston River vs Racing: match statistics

Boston River crest
Boston River
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Racing crest
Racing
120%(2.80)
X25%(3.00)
255%(2.54)

Racing is demonstrating significantly better form and efficiency in away matches. The away team has not lost a single match on the road this season (50% win rate, 50% draw rate), scoring an average of 2 goals per game with a shot conversion rate of 22%. Boston River has a very poor home disposition - a 0% win rate in home games, a 67% loss rate, and a mere 0.33 goals per game alongside an alarmingly low efficiency rate (5%). The hosts have failed to score in 67% of their home matches, which makes them highly vulnerable to defeat given Racing's offensive firepower. The difference in goal differential (-2 for the hosts vs +2 for the visitors) and Racing's advantage in expected goals (xG 1.27 vs 0.99) further confirm the clear superiority of the visiting team.

Boston River vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Boston River play Racing in Primera División (Uruguay). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 21:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Boston River: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Racing: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Boston River scores 0.95 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Racing scores 1.30 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Boston River 45%, Racing 55%. Over 2.5: Boston River 40%, Racing 30%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.28. Boston River: 10.3 shots per match, Racing: 13.2.

Match halves

Boston River: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.65. Racing: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Boston River: 76-90+ (7 goals). Racing: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Racing is demonstrating significantly better form and efficiency in away matches. The away team has not lost a single match on the road this season (50% win rate, 50% draw rate), scoring an average of 2 goals per game with a shot conversion rate of 22%. Boston River has a very poor home disposition - a 0% win rate in home games, a 67% loss rate, and a mere 0.33 goals per game alongside an alarmingly low efficiency rate (5%). The hosts have failed to score in 67% of their home matches, which makes them highly vulnerable to defeat given Racing's offensive firepower. The difference in goal differential (-2 for the hosts vs +2 for the visitors) and Racing's advantage in expected goals (xG 1.27 vs 0.99) further confirm the clear superiority of the visiting team.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Boston RiverRacing
8Shots15
Boston RiverRacing
3Shots on target7
Boston RiverRacing
1.04xG1.82
Boston RiverRacing
4Corners9
Boston RiverRacing
45Dangerous attacks53
Boston RiverRacing
10Fouls20
Boston RiverRacing
2Cards4
Boston RiverRacing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.95Goals scored / match1.3
Boston RiverRacing
1.3Goals conceded / match0.8
Boston RiverRacing
51%Average possession48%
Boston RiverRacing
3.95Shots on target / match4.2
Boston RiverRacing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.25Shots per match13.15
Boston RiverRacing
3.95Shots on target4.2
Boston RiverRacing
9.3%Shot conversion9.9%
Boston RiverRacing
51%Possession48%
Boston RiverRacing
1.28xG for1.61
Boston RiverRacing
1.62xG against1.08
Boston RiverRacing

Shooting quality

Boston River: BalancedRacing: Balanced
Boston RiverRacing
Accuracy (shots on target)39%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Boston River · 1.4 pts / match - Racing

Boston River
WLLDD
Season result split
30% W20% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-10
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Racing
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W40% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-2
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Boston River · 1.3 goals / match - Racing

Racing is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Boston River · 0.8 goals / match - Racing

Boston River scoring profile: mixed

Boston River scores in 55% of matches (11 of 20 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Boston River keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

19Goals scored (season)26
Boston RiverRacing
26Goals conceded (season)16
Boston RiverRacing
2.25Average goals in match2.1
Boston RiverRacing
5Goals scored (last 5)3
Boston RiverRacing
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
Boston RiverRacing

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal85%
Boston RiverRacing
20%2 goals30%
Boston RiverRacing
10%3 goals10%
Boston RiverRacing
10%4 goals5%
Boston RiverRacing

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal60%
Boston RiverRacing
35%2 goals10%
Boston RiverRacing
10%3 goals5%
Boston RiverRacing
5%4 goals5%
Boston RiverRacing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time25%
Boston RiverRacing
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Boston RiverRacing
15%Scored in both halves20%
Boston RiverRacing

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Boston RiverRacing
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Boston RiverRacing
40%BTTS - last 540%
Boston RiverRacing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Boston RiverRacing
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Boston RiverRacing
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Boston RiverRacing

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Boston RiverRacing
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Boston RiverRacing
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Boston RiverRacing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Boston River · 1.7 pts / match - Racing

Boston River - half-time state
15% leading60% draw25% trailing
Racing - half-time state
40% leading50% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.7
Boston RiverRacing
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Boston RiverRacing
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Boston RiverRacing
0.75Average goals (1st half)1
Boston RiverRacing
60%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Boston RiverRacing
75%No goal before half-time40%
Boston RiverRacing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)1.35
Boston RiverRacing
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Boston RiverRacing
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
Boston RiverRacing
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.1
Boston RiverRacing
40%Clean sheet after half-time65%
Boston RiverRacing
55%No goal after half-time55%
Boston RiverRacing

Boston River - second-half results

25% W35% R40% P
21
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Racing - second-half results

30% W45% R25% P
34
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Boston River - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Boston River
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
0
4
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
2
7
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Racing
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Boston River

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

Boston RiverLigaRacing
Average goals in match 2.252.42 2.10
Both teams scored 45%53% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%46% 30%
Clean sheets 20%27% 40%
Goal before half-time 50%69% 65%
Goal after half-time 75%73% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Boston River 0 - 1 - 2 Racing. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Racing Club de Montevideo
0 : 0
CA Boston River
Racing Club de Montevideo
2 : 0
CA Boston River
CA Boston River
1 : 3
Racing Club de Montevideo

FAQ

What was the result of Boston River vs Racing?

The Primera División match finished Boston River 0:1 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Boston River and Racing?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Boston River won 0, Racing won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Boston River vs Racing?

Boston River score 0.95 goals per game on average and Racing 1.30. The Primera División average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Boston River's matches and 55% of Racing's.

What form are Boston River and Racing in?

Over the last 5 games Boston River have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Racing 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Boston River vs Racing?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.