Denmark - SuperligaBrøndby StadionData current as of November 02, 2026

Brøndby vs AGF: match statistics

Brøndby crest
Brøndby
2 : 0half-time 1:0
AGF crest
AGF

Brøndby vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Brøndby played against AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on November 1, 2026. Venue: Brøndby Stadion. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Brøndby has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. AGF has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Brøndby scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.67. AGF scores 1.42 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Brøndby's games and 75% of AGF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 67%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.67 per game. Brøndby takes 15.0 shots per game, while AGF takes 15.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Brøndby leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. AGF leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Brøndby's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For AGF, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Superliga games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Brøndby have won 67% of their home matches, while AGF are yet to win away, recording 50% draws and 50% defeats. The hosts average 2 goals from 1.83 xG at home, while the visitors concede 1.83 goals away from home against opponents averaging 1.82 xG, pointing to a genuine chance for Brøndby to create dangerous opportunities. The hosts’ advantage is also reflected in their average of 16.67 shots per home match, compared with AGF’s 13.33 shots per away match. In their last five games, Brøndby have won 3 times and scored 11 goals, but have conceded 7, meaning their defense could give the visitors opportunities. AGF have conceded just 4 goals over the same period and have drawn 6 of their 12 league matches this season, so a draw remains a significant possibility despite the hosts’ advantage.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS landed in 67% of Brøndby’s matches and 83% of AGF’s, both above the league average of 63%. The hosts score an average of 1.67 goals per match, while the visitors concede 1.83, strongly pointing to a Brøndby goal. AGF average 1.17 goals scored, while Brøndby concede 1.33 and keep a clean sheet in only 17% of matches, giving the visitors a realistic chance of scoring as well. In their last five matches, both teams scored in 80% of Brøndby’s games and 60% of AGF’s, although the visitors’ lower average of 1.09 xG over that period slightly reduces confidence in the prediction. Taken together, these figures make BTTS - Yes the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Every match involving either team this season has featured at least 2 goals, with Over 2.5 goals landing in 67% of each team's matches. Brøndby average 1.67 goals scored against an xG of 1.87, while AGF concede an average of 1.83 goals, with opponents recording an xG of 1.82, which points to goals from the home side. The visitors average 1.17 goals scored, and Brøndby concede 1.33, making an away goal a realistic prospect as well. Although the combined expected-goals total is 3.20, Over 1.5 goals remains the strongest pick: it is supported by both teams' runs so far, while Over 2.5 has less backing in the results.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Brøndby average 1.67 goals at home, while AGF concede 1.83 away, and the hosts’ xG stands at 1.87 compared with 1.82 xG conceded by the visitors. Brøndby had a lead at the break in 2 of their 6 home matches, while AGF were trailing at half-time in 2 of their 6 away matches and scored an average of just 0.33 goals in the first half. After the break, the visitors concede an average of 1.17 goals away from home, increasing the hosts’ chances of holding on to any potential lead. AGF have not won any of their 6 away matches, while Brøndby average 1.5 points per home match compared with the visitors’ 0.5 points per away match. A half-time draw remains a realistic alternative, as Brøndby recorded one in 3 of their last 5 matches; however, the hosts’ attacking advantage and AGF’s away struggles point most strongly to the 1/1 HT/FT scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
BrøndbyAGF
14Shots16
BrøndbyAGF
4Shots on target1
BrøndbyAGF
1.55xG1.49
BrøndbyAGF
9Corners6
BrøndbyAGF
52Dangerous attacks58
BrøndbyAGF
21Fouls13
BrøndbyAGF
3Cards1
BrøndbyAGF

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.75Goals scored / game1.42
BrøndbyAGF
1.67Goals allowed / game1.58
BrøndbyAGF
54%Average possession55%
BrøndbyAGF
4.17Shots on target / game4.08
BrøndbyAGF

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15Shots per game15.58
BrøndbyAGF
4.17Shots on target4.08
BrøndbyAGF
11.7%Shot conversion9.1%
BrøndbyAGF
54%Possession55%
BrøndbyAGF
1.67xG for1.67
BrøndbyAGF
1.43xG against1.56
BrøndbyAGF

Shooting quality

Brøndby: AttackingAGF: Dominant
BrøndbyAGF
Accuracy (shots on target)28%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

AGF is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Brøndby · 1.6 pts / game - AGF

Brøndby
LLWLW
Season result split
50% W8% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-5
1.58 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
AGF
LDWDW
Season result split
17% W50% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Brøndby is 23% better for: goals scored per game.

1.75 goals / game - Brøndby · 1.42 goals / game - AGF

AGF is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - Brøndby · 1.58 goals / game - AGF

Brøndby scoring profile: very strong

Brøndby scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 games), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 games).

AGF scoring profile: very strong

AGF scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 games), while Brøndby keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 games).

21Goals scored (season)17
BrøndbyAGF
20Goals conceded (season)19
BrøndbyAGF
3.42Average goals per game3
BrøndbyAGF
10Goals scored (last 5)8
BrøndbyAGF
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
BrøndbyAGF

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal83%
BrøndbyAGF
42%2 goals50%
BrøndbyAGF
33%3 goals8%
BrøndbyAGF
8%4 goals0%
BrøndbyAGF

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal92%
BrøndbyAGF
50%2 goals67%
BrøndbyAGF
25%3 goals0%
BrøndbyAGF
8%4 goals0%
BrøndbyAGF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
BrøndbyAGF
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BrøndbyAGF
25%Scored in both halves25%
BrøndbyAGF

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
BrøndbyAGF
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
BrøndbyAGF
80%BTTS - last 560%
BrøndbyAGF

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
BrøndbyAGF
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
BrøndbyAGF
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
BrøndbyAGF

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
BrøndbyAGF
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
BrøndbyAGF
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
BrøndbyAGF

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Brøndby - half-time state
25% leading33% draw42% trailing
AGF - half-time state
25% leading33% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per game (1st half)1.08
BrøndbyAGF
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.58
BrøndbyAGF
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
BrøndbyAGF
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.33
BrøndbyAGF
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
BrøndbyAGF
58%No goal before half-time58%
BrøndbyAGF

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.33
BrøndbyAGF
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
BrøndbyAGF
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
BrøndbyAGF
1.92Average goals (2nd half)1.67
BrøndbyAGF
42%Clean sheet after half-time42%
BrøndbyAGF
33%No goal after half-time33%
BrøndbyAGF

Brøndby - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
13
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AGF - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Brøndby - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game2.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
AGF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Brøndby
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

AGF
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
4
1
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Brøndby

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

AGF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

BrøndbyLigaAGF
Average goals per game▲ 3.423.09• 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 67%63%▲ 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%58%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 17%20%▼ 8%
Goal before half-time• 75%76%• 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 92%88%▲ 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / game
1.41
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BrøndbyGoalMarko DivkovićAssist: Max Ejdum
  2. BrøndbySubstitutionOn: Raphael Canut PedersenOff: Luis Binks
  3. BrøndbyYellow cardMads Frøkjær-Jensen
  4. BrøndbyYellow cardMarcus Younis
  5. AGFSubstitutionOn: Colin RoslerOff: Callum McCowatt
  6. BrøndbyYellow cardOliver Villadsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Brøndby's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses against AGF. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

AGF
1 : 1
Brøndby
Brøndby IF
0 : 2
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
0 : 0
Brøndby IF
Brøndby IF
3 : 3
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
1 : 0
Brøndby IF

FAQ

What was the result of Brøndby vs AGF?

The Superliga match finished Brøndby 2:0 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Brøndby and AGF?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Brøndby won 0, AGF won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Brøndby vs AGF?

Brøndby score 1.75 goals per game on average and AGF 1.42. The Superliga average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Brøndby's matches and 75% of AGF's.

What form are Brøndby and AGF in?

Over the last 5 games Brøndby have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and AGF 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brøndby vs AGF?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Brøndby vs AGF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.