Brann vs KFUM: match statistics
Brann vs KFUM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Brann play KFUM in Eliteserien (Norway). The match date is 16 May 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Brann: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. KFUM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Brann scores 2.00 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. KFUM scores 1.00 and concedes 1.62. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Brann 86%, KFUM 46%. Over 2.5: Brann 86%, KFUM 54%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Brann has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.26. Brann: 12.9 shots per match, KFUM: 10.6.
Match halves
Brann: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.93. KFUM: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Brann: 31-45+ (9 goals). KFUM: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 1-2-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 25%.
Match description
Brann has a clear edge based on form and quality of created chances: the hosts scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches (avg. 2.8 per game) versus 4 goals for KFUM (0.8 per game). Over the last 5 fixtures Brann averages 2.2 points per game, while KFUM manages only 0.8, highlighting the gap in current form. Chance-quality metrics also favour Brann — the hosts’ average xG is 1.78 with xG against 1.24, whereas KFUM posts xG for 1.55 and xG against 1.67, indicating a weaker away defence. The defensive differential is crucial: Brann concedes 1.33 goals at home on average, while KFUM concedes 2.75 goals away and has an away goal difference of -6; additionally the visitors have shipped 10 goals in their last 5 matches. Although KFUM register more on-target shots away (5.5 vs 3.67), their lower efficiency and inferior defensive metrics point toward a Brann victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Brann | KFUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Brann is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Brann · 0.8 pts / match - KFUM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Brann is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Brann · 1 goals / match - KFUM
Brann scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
KFUM scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Brann keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Brann
Over / Under — KFUM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Brann is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Brann · 0.85 pts / match - KFUM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Brann - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
KFUM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Brann
KFUM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| Brann | Liga | KFUM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.57 | 2.95 | ▼ 2.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 86% | 55% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 57% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 24% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 93% | 82% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 78% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Brann 1 - 2 - 1 KFUM. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 25% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Brann vs KFUM?
The Eliteserien match finished Brann 2:1 KFUM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Brann and KFUM?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Brann won 1, KFUM won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Brann vs KFUM?
Brann score 2.00 goals per game on average and KFUM 1.00. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 86% of Brann's matches and 46% of KFUM's.
What form are Brann and KFUM in?
Over the last 5 games Brann have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and KFUM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brann vs KFUM?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Brann vs KFUM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.