Brisbane Roar vs Auckland: match statistics
Auckland FC displays significantly better form and league standing, leading the competition with 6 victories in 11 matches. The visitors demonstrate impressive offensive efficiency with 16 goals scored this season and an average of 1.4 goals per away match, failing to score in only 20% of their games. Brisbane Roar is in poorer form, securing just 4 points in their last 5 fixtures with a goal difference of 3:7. Auckland remains unbeaten on the road this season (60% wins, 40% draws), providing a statistical and psychological edge. Superior xG (1.48 vs 1.34) and possession (51% vs 46%) metrics further favor the visitors. Considering all factors, Auckland has a strong chance of securing all three points, although Brisbane's solid home defense (80% clean sheets) could pose challenges, meaning a draw cannot be entirely ruled out.
Brisbane Roar vs Auckland: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Brisbane Roar played against Auckland in A-League (Australia). The game was played on January 9, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Brisbane Roar has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Auckland has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Brisbane Roar scores 0.92 goals per game and allows 0.83. Auckland scores 1.45 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Brisbane Roar's games and 73% of Auckland's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 55%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Auckland has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.31 per game. Brisbane Roar takes 12.3 shots per game, while Auckland takes 16.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Brisbane Roar leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Auckland leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Brisbane Roar's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Auckland, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A-League games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Auckland FC displays significantly better form and league standing, leading the competition with 6 victories in 11 matches. The visitors demonstrate impressive offensive efficiency with 16 goals scored this season and an average of 1.4 goals per away match, failing to score in only 20% of their games. Brisbane Roar is in poorer form, securing just 4 points in their last 5 fixtures with a goal difference of 3:7. Auckland remains unbeaten on the road this season (60% wins, 40% draws), providing a statistical and psychological edge. Superior xG (1.48 vs 1.34) and possession (51% vs 46%) metrics further favor the visitors. Considering all factors, Auckland has a strong chance of securing all three points, although Brisbane's solid home defense (80% clean sheets) could pose challenges, meaning a draw cannot be entirely ruled out.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Brisbane Roar | Auckland | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Auckland is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Brisbane Roar · 2 pts / game - Auckland
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auckland is 58% better for: goals scored per game.
0.92 goals / game - Brisbane Roar · 1.45 goals / game - Auckland
Brisbane Roar is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Brisbane Roar · 1 goals / game - Auckland
Brisbane Roar scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Auckland keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 meczów).
Auckland scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 meczów), while Brisbane Roar keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Brisbane Roar
Over / Under - Auckland
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Brisbane Roar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Auckland - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Brisbane Roar
Auckland
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A-League).
Teams vs league
| Brisbane Roar | Liga | Auckland | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.75 | 2.60 | ▼ 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 51% | ▲ 73% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 49% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 29% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 69% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 69% | ▼ 55% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Brisbane Roar's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Auckland. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Brisbane Roar vs Auckland?
The A-League match finished Brisbane Roar 0:2 Auckland. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Brisbane Roar vs Auckland?
Brisbane Roar score 0.92 goals per game on average and Auckland 1.45. The A-League average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Brisbane Roar's matches and 73% of Auckland's.
What form are Brisbane Roar and Auckland in?
Over the last 5 games Brisbane Roar have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Auckland 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brisbane Roar vs Auckland?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.