Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio: match statistics
Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Brooklyn FC played against San Antonio in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on July 25, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Brooklyn FC has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. San Antonio has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Brooklyn FC scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.73. San Antonio scores 1.31 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Brooklyn FC's games and 50% of San Antonio's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 44%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Brooklyn FC has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.32 per game. Brooklyn FC takes 11.1 shots per game, while San Antonio takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Brooklyn FC leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. San Antonio leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Brooklyn FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For San Antonio, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL Championship games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
San Antonio appears to be the favorite: they sit 5th in the table versus Brooklyn’s 23rd and have 6 wins this season compared to the hosts’ 3. The visitors average 1.25 goals on the road and have a 12% shot conversion, while Brooklyn score only 0.86 at home with a 7% conversion, despite the hosts producing higher xG (1.54 at home vs 1.12 xG for the visitors). Brooklyn attempt more shots (12.0 average and 4.86 on target) than San Antonio (10.13 and 3.0 on target), but lower conversion and 43% of matches without a goal limit their efficiency. Brooklyn’s defense concedes 1.0 goal at home on average versus 1.5 conceded by San Antonio away, however the hosts lose 57% of home matches compared to only 25% defeats for the visitors on the road. Considering better shot conversion, higher away goals average and superior average points in the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 1.2), San Antonio have the greater probability of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes with an approximate probability of 55% vs 45% because xG indicates the home side expect around 1.49 goals (Brooklyn xG for 1.53 vs San Antonio xG allowed 1.45), and the visitors about 1.23 goals (San Antonio xG for 1.12 vs Brooklyn xG allowed 1.33). With those expectations the probability Brooklyn scores at least once is roughly 77% and San Antonio about 71%, which roughly yields ~55% chance for BTTS. Supporting the 'Yes' case are shot metrics: Brooklyn averages 13.38 shots and 4.63 on target versus 10.13 and 3.0 for San Antonio, so despite the visitors' higher conversion (12% vs 10%) San Antonio still generate enough xG to score. Offsetting signals include that San Antonio fail to score in 50% of matches and Brooklyn keep a clean sheet in 50% of home games, which reduces BTTS certainty. Overall, given the xG edge on both sides and a league BTTS rate of 57%, I give a moderate edge to the 'Yes' scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate the total goals in this match at approximately 2.72 (expected goals: Brooklyn 1.49 and San Antonio 1.23), calculated as Brooklyn’s attack xG 1.53 vs San Antonio’s conceded xG 1.45, and conversely San Antonio’s attack xG 1.12 vs Brooklyn’s conceded xG 1.33. Seasonal indicators support goal propensity: Brooklyn have 63% of matches over 1.5 goals, San Antonio 75%, and the league average goals per match is 2.79. Brooklyn average 13.38 shots and 4.63 on target with a conversion rate of 10%; San Antonio 10.13 shots and 3.0 on target with a 12% conversion — figures consistent with the projected xG. Given the combined expectation of 2.72 goals and strong seasonal rates of 63–75% for >1.5, I recommend Over 1.5 (model probability ≈75%); the 2.5 line is only marginally favored (~51%) and Over 3.5 carries low probability (~29%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Brooklyn FC holds a clear lead at the break: the home side led at halftime in 50% of their home matches and average 0.75 goals by the break while conceding only 0.13. Over full matches Brooklyn records an xG of 1.53 versus San Antonio’s 1.12 and scores an average of 1.38 home goals per game while conceding 0.88, with the home side averaging 4.63 shots on target against the visitors’ 3.0, confirming an offensive and creative edge. San Antonio as the away team posts weaker figures: 25% away wins, an average of 1.25 goals scored and 1.5 conceded per match, and led at halftime in only 25% of games, so a scenario where the visitors lead after 45 minutes is unlikely. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet at halftime in 88% of home matches and collect an average of 1.88 points per game this season versus San Antonio’s 1.25, which favors maintaining the halftime lead and converting it into a win. On this basis the most probable and strongest signal is the home side leading at halftime and winning the match (1/1), with lower chances of a draw after the break or a turnaround by San Antonio.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Brooklyn FC | San Antonio | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Brooklyn FC is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Brooklyn FC · 1 pts / game - San Antonio
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Antonio is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Brooklyn FC · 1.31 goals / game - San Antonio
San Antonio is 45% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.73 goals / game - Brooklyn FC · 1.19 goals / game - San Antonio
Brooklyn FC scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
San Antonio scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Brooklyn FC
Over / Under - San Antonio
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Antonio is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - Brooklyn FC · 1.63 pts / game - San Antonio
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Brooklyn FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
San Antonio - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Brooklyn FC
San Antonio
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Brooklyn FC | Liga | San Antonio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.87 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 52% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 26% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 67% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 80% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?
The USL Championship match finished Brooklyn FC 0:1 San Antonio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?
Brooklyn FC score 1.13 goals per game on average and San Antonio 1.31. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Brooklyn FC's matches and 50% of San Antonio's.
What form are Brooklyn FC and San Antonio in?
Over the last 5 games Brooklyn FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and San Antonio 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?
The statistical background for Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


