United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of September 07, 2026

Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio: match statistics

Brooklyn FC crest
Brooklyn FC
0 : 1half-time 0:0
San Antonio crest
San Antonio

Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Brooklyn FC played against San Antonio in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on July 25, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Brooklyn FC has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. San Antonio has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Brooklyn FC scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.73. San Antonio scores 1.31 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 47% of Brooklyn FC's games and 50% of San Antonio's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 44%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Brooklyn FC has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.32 per game. Brooklyn FC takes 11.1 shots per game, while San Antonio takes 11.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Brooklyn FC leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. San Antonio leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.69 after halftime.

When the teams score

Brooklyn FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For San Antonio, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL Championship games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

San Antonio appears to be the favorite: they sit 5th in the table versus Brooklyn’s 23rd and have 6 wins this season compared to the hosts’ 3. The visitors average 1.25 goals on the road and have a 12% shot conversion, while Brooklyn score only 0.86 at home with a 7% conversion, despite the hosts producing higher xG (1.54 at home vs 1.12 xG for the visitors). Brooklyn attempt more shots (12.0 average and 4.86 on target) than San Antonio (10.13 and 3.0 on target), but lower conversion and 43% of matches without a goal limit their efficiency. Brooklyn’s defense concedes 1.0 goal at home on average versus 1.5 conceded by San Antonio away, however the hosts lose 57% of home matches compared to only 25% defeats for the visitors on the road. Considering better shot conversion, higher away goals average and superior average points in the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 1.2), San Antonio have the greater probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project BTTS - Yes with an approximate probability of 55% vs 45% because xG indicates the home side expect around 1.49 goals (Brooklyn xG for 1.53 vs San Antonio xG allowed 1.45), and the visitors about 1.23 goals (San Antonio xG for 1.12 vs Brooklyn xG allowed 1.33). With those expectations the probability Brooklyn scores at least once is roughly 77% and San Antonio about 71%, which roughly yields ~55% chance for BTTS. Supporting the 'Yes' case are shot metrics: Brooklyn averages 13.38 shots and 4.63 on target versus 10.13 and 3.0 for San Antonio, so despite the visitors' higher conversion (12% vs 10%) San Antonio still generate enough xG to score. Offsetting signals include that San Antonio fail to score in 50% of matches and Brooklyn keep a clean sheet in 50% of home games, which reduces BTTS certainty. Overall, given the xG edge on both sides and a league BTTS rate of 57%, I give a moderate edge to the 'Yes' scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate the total goals in this match at approximately 2.72 (expected goals: Brooklyn 1.49 and San Antonio 1.23), calculated as Brooklyn’s attack xG 1.53 vs San Antonio’s conceded xG 1.45, and conversely San Antonio’s attack xG 1.12 vs Brooklyn’s conceded xG 1.33. Seasonal indicators support goal propensity: Brooklyn have 63% of matches over 1.5 goals, San Antonio 75%, and the league average goals per match is 2.79. Brooklyn average 13.38 shots and 4.63 on target with a conversion rate of 10%; San Antonio 10.13 shots and 3.0 on target with a 12% conversion — figures consistent with the projected xG. Given the combined expectation of 2.72 goals and strong seasonal rates of 63–75% for >1.5, I recommend Over 1.5 (model probability ≈75%); the 2.5 line is only marginally favored (~51%) and Over 3.5 carries low probability (~29%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Brooklyn FC holds a clear lead at the break: the home side led at halftime in 50% of their home matches and average 0.75 goals by the break while conceding only 0.13. Over full matches Brooklyn records an xG of 1.53 versus San Antonio’s 1.12 and scores an average of 1.38 home goals per game while conceding 0.88, with the home side averaging 4.63 shots on target against the visitors’ 3.0, confirming an offensive and creative edge. San Antonio as the away team posts weaker figures: 25% away wins, an average of 1.25 goals scored and 1.5 conceded per match, and led at halftime in only 25% of games, so a scenario where the visitors lead after 45 minutes is unlikely. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet at halftime in 88% of home matches and collect an average of 1.88 points per game this season versus San Antonio’s 1.25, which favors maintaining the halftime lead and converting it into a win. On this basis the most probable and strongest signal is the home side leading at halftime and winning the match (1/1), with lower chances of a draw after the break or a turnaround by San Antonio.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
-1Shots-1
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
-1Shots on target-1
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
0xG0
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
-1Corners-1
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
0Dangerous attacks0
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
-1Fouls-1
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
-1Cards-1
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
1.13Goals scored / game1.31
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
1.73Goals allowed / game1.19
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
50%Average possession53%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
4.73Shots on target / game3.81
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.13Shots per game11.69
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
4.73Shots on target3.81
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
10.2%Shot conversion11.2%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
50%Possession53%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
1.43xG for1.32
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
1.64xG against1.39
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

Shooting quality

Brooklyn FC: BalancedSan Antonio: Balanced
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
Accuracy (shots on target)42%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Brooklyn FC is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Brooklyn FC · 1 pts / game - San Antonio

Brooklyn FC
DDLWD
Season result split
20% W27% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-8
0.87 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
San Antonio
DLWDL
Season result split
38% W44% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-3
1.56 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Antonio is 16% better for: goals scored per game.

1.13 goals / game - Brooklyn FC · 1.31 goals / game - San Antonio

San Antonio is 45% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.73 goals / game - Brooklyn FC · 1.19 goals / game - San Antonio

Brooklyn FC scoring profile: strong

Brooklyn FC scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).

San Antonio scoring profile: strong

San Antonio scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).

17Goals scored (season)21
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
26Goals conceded (season)19
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
2.87Average goals per game2.5
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal63%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
40%2 goals44%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
7%3 goals19%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
0%4 goals6%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal63%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
60%2 goals38%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
27%3 goals13%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
7%4 goals6%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time19%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
13%BTTS in both halves13%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
20%Scored in both halves31%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
60%BTTS - last 560%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Antonio is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / game - Brooklyn FC · 1.63 pts / game - San Antonio

Brooklyn FC - half-time state
27% leading33% draw40% trailing
San Antonio - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per game (1st half)1.63
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.13
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
40%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
60%No goal before half-time50%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per game (2nd half)1.25
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
47%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio
53%No goal after half-time56%
Brooklyn FCSan Antonio

Brooklyn FC - second-half results

27% W27% R47% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

San Antonio - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
26
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Brooklyn FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.60
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game1.20.4
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
San Antonio - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Brooklyn FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

San Antonio
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
6
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.68
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Brooklyn FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

San Antonio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Brooklyn FCLigaSan Antonio
Average goals per game 2.872.79 2.50
Both teams scored 47%58% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%52% 44%
Clean sheets 20%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 80%67% 63%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.25
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Brooklyn FCYellow cardPierre Da Silva
  2. Brooklyn FCYellow cardThomas McNamara
  3. San AntonioYellow cardJorge Hernandez
  4. San AntonioYellow cardJoseph Batrouni
  5. San AntonioYellow cardCurt Calov
  6. Brooklyn FCSubstitutionOn: Jaden Enrique ServaniaOff: Taimu Okiyoshi
  7. San AntonioYellow cardSantiago Suarez
  8. San AntonioSubstitutionOn: Dominick HernandezOff: Jorge Hernandez
  9. Brooklyn FCYellow cardGabriel Alcides Alves

FAQ

What was the result of Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?

The USL Championship match finished Brooklyn FC 0:1 San Antonio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?

Brooklyn FC score 1.13 goals per game on average and San Antonio 1.31. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Brooklyn FC's matches and 50% of San Antonio's.

What form are Brooklyn FC and San Antonio in?

Over the last 5 games Brooklyn FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and San Antonio 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?

The statistical background for Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.