Hungary - NB IIData current as of September 06, 2026

Budafoki MTE vs Szeged 2011: match statistics

Budafoki MTE crest
Budafoki MTE
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Szeged 2011 crest
Szeged 2011

Budafoki MTE vs Szeged 2011: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Budafoki MTE played against Szeged 2011 in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Budafoki MTE has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Szeged 2011 has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Budafoki MTE scores 0.96 goals per game and allows 1.69. Szeged 2011 scores 1.00 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 42% of Budafoki MTE's games and 38% of Szeged 2011's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 38%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Szeged 2011 has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.36 per game. Budafoki MTE takes 10.6 shots per game, while Szeged 2011 takes 11.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Budafoki MTE leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. Szeged 2011 leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.62 after halftime.

When the teams score

Budafoki MTE's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Szeged 2011, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB II games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Szeged 2011 is the favorite based on form: the visitors average 1.4 points per match over the last 5 fixtures versus just 0.2 pts for Budafoki, who have not won in that span (0-1-4). The defensive edge for the visitors is evident — Szeged concedes 1.00 goal on average away and has 31 goals conceded this season, while Budafoki concede 1.38 at home and 44 goals overall. Offenses are weak and comparable: Budafoki score 1.00 goal at home on average (xG 1.34), Szeged 0.85 goals away (xG 1.29); both teams have netted 4 goals in the last 5 matches, with Budafoki conceding 9 goals versus 8 for Szeged. Quality-of-chance metrics show similarity — shots on target 3.38 vs 3.54 and conversion 9% vs 8% — however Budafoki have as many as 54% draws at home and only 23% clean sheets, while Szeged records 31% clean sheets away, giving the visitors greater defensive stability. Considering 1.4 pts vs 0.2 pts, better defense (1.00 vs 1.38) and the higher clean sheet rate for the visitors (31% vs 23%), I favor a Szeged 2011 win, although the high share of home draws increases the probability of a points split.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

xG analysis shows the home side have xG 1.66 against an away defense conceding 1.36, yielding an expected ~1.51 goals for Budafoki, while Szeged’s average xG is ~1.33 (1.29 vs 1.37). A Poisson approximation gives the home team ~78% chance to score at least once and the visitors ~74%, implying roughly a 57% probability for BTTS - Yes. Counterarguments are seasonal metrics: both teams have BTTS in only 38% of matches (below the league 48%), the away side fail to score in 46% of their season’s matches and have only 20% BTTS in the last 5 games. However, the home defense is weak (44 goals conceded this season and 1.8 conceded on average in the last 5) and overall goal figures are moderate (home 25 scored, away 26), supporting the view that both sides have a realistic chance to score. Therefore I rate BTTS 57% vs 43% and recommend BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis shows Budafoki has an attacking xG of 1.66, Szeged 1.29, and xG against 1.37 and 1.36 respectively; averaging these I project ~1.51 goals for the home side and ~1.33 for the visitors (total 2.84). The total 2.84 is above the league average of 2.53, and a Poisson model with λ=2.84 yields P(Over 1.5) ≈77.6% (rounded 78%), P(Over 2.5) ≈54% and P(Over 3.5) ≈32%. Additionally, Budafoki at home have 77% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Szeged 54%, and the shot statistics (home 12.23 shots and 3.15 on target, away 10.69 and 3.54) plus conversion 9% vs 8% support at least two goals. Although in the last 5 matches both teams scored on average 0.8 goals each, their recent xG 1.35 (home) and 1.12 (away) indicate they are creating more chances than the final scores suggest; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (over), highlighted by the model probability of 78% and the historical 77% for the home team.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back X/1 (draw at half-time, Budafoki to win full-time). The first half is expected to be low-scoring: home teams average 0.31 goals by half-time, visitors 0.46, and the share of matches with both teams scoring before the break is only 8% (home) and 0% (away), which favors a draw at the break. After the break the home side’s advantage is clear – Budafoki’s second-half goals average 1.62 with 85% of matches featuring at least one goal after the break, versus 0.85 and 54% for Szeged, so Budafoki has greater potential to score decisive goals in the second half. Additionally, the home team’s season xG is 1.66 versus 1.29 for the visitors, and the season average points are 1.38 vs 1.08 (win rate 38% vs 23%), which confirms Budafoki’s season-long superiority. In light of these figures the X/1 scenario receives the highest probability (27%), with a moderate chance of a full-time draw (X/X 14%) and a lower probability of the visitors maintaining a lead (2/2 13%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
9Shots7
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
3Shots on target2
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
1.03xG0.83
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
6Corners1
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
35Dangerous attacks34
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
-1Fouls-1
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
1Cards4
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
0.96Goals scored / game1
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
1.69Goals allowed / game1.19
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
47%Average possession52%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
3.62Shots on target / game3.35
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.62Shots per game11.46
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
3.62Shots on target3.35
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
9.1%Shot conversion8.7%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
47%Possession52%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
1.36xG for1.48
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
1.54xG against1.37
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

Shooting quality

Budafoki MTE: BalancedSzeged 2011: Balanced
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
Accuracy (shots on target)34%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Szeged 2011 is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - Budafoki MTE · 1.4 pts / game - Szeged 2011

Budafoki MTE
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
19% W27% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-14
0.85 pts / game · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Szeged 2011
WWLDL
Season result split
31% W31% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-10
1.23 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Szeged 2011 is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.69 goals / game - Budafoki MTE · 1.19 goals / game - Szeged 2011

Budafoki MTE scoring profile: strong

Budafoki MTE scores in 58% of games (15 of 26 meczów), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 meczów).

Szeged 2011 scoring profile: strong

Szeged 2011 scores in 62% of games (16 of 26 meczów), while Budafoki MTE keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)26
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
44Goals conceded (season)31
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
2.65Average goals per game2.19
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal62%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
35%2 goals23%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
4%3 goals8%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
0%4 goals8%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal69%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
54%2 goals27%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
23%3 goals15%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
8%4 goals8%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time4%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
19%Scored in both halves8%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
60%BTTS - last 520%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Budafoki MTE is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.92 pts / game - Budafoki MTE · 0.88 pts / game - Szeged 2011

Budafoki MTE - half-time state
23% leading23% draw54% trailing
Szeged 2011 - half-time state
19% leading31% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per game (1st half)0.88
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
0.35Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
1.19Average goals (1st half)0.96
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
42%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
69%No goal before half-time77%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per game (2nd half)1.46
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
38%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011
54%No goal after half-time54%
Budafoki MTESzeged 2011

Budafoki MTE - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 19%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Szeged 2011 - second-half results

35% W42% R23% P
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Budafoki MTE - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.00
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Szeged 2011 - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Budafoki MTE
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
3
10
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
7
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Szeged 2011
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
5
7
31-45
9
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Budafoki MTE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Szeged 2011

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

Budafoki MTELigaSzeged 2011
Average goals per game 2.652.53 2.19
Both teams scored 42%48% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%45% 38%
Clean sheets 19%29% 31%
Goal before half-time 81%70% 73%
Goal after half-time 85%80% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / game
1.20
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Szeged 2011SubstitutionOn: Zoltán SzilágyiOff: Bence Tóth
  2. Szeged 2011Yellow cardVanja Zvekanov
  3. Szeged 2011Yellow cardDomonkos Miskolczi
  4. Budafoki MTEYellow cardBertalan Kun
  5. Szeged 2011Yellow cardMárton Sándor
  6. Szeged 2011Yellow cardÁdám Halmai
  7. Budafoki MTEGoalMárk Jagodics
  8. Budafoki MTESubstitutionOn: Subhi KazmouzOff: Márió Németh
  9. Budafoki MTEGoalMáté Fekete

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Bana GergelyMatches officiated: 8
4.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 263%Home wins13%Draws25%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Budafoki MTE's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Szeged 2011. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Szeged 2011 FC
4 : 0
Budafoki MTE

FAQ

What was the result of Budafoki MTE vs Szeged 2011?

The NB II match finished Budafoki MTE 2:0 Szeged 2011. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Budafoki MTE vs Szeged 2011?

Budafoki MTE score 0.96 goals per game on average and Szeged 2011 1.00. The NB II average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Budafoki MTE's matches and 38% of Szeged 2011's.

What form are Budafoki MTE and Szeged 2011 in?

Over the last 5 games Budafoki MTE have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Szeged 2011 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Budafoki MTE vs Szeged 2011?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.