BUL vs Kitara: match statistics
BUL vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
BUL played against Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on May 19, 2026. Venue: Kakindu Municipal Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
BUL has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Kitara has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
BUL scores 1.04 goals per game and allows 1.00. Kitara scores 1.37 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.07 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of BUL's games and 33% of Kitara's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 30%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kitara has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.63 per game. BUL takes 11.1 shots per game, while Kitara takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
BUL leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Kitara leads at halftime in 59% and scores 0.44 after halftime.
When the teams score
BUL's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). For Kitara, it is minutes 0-15 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.07 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The analysis indicates an advantage for Kitara: the team sits 3rd in the table versus BUL in 8th and has 16 wins this season compared to the hosts' 9. Defensively Kitara is more stable — they concede on average 0.86 goals away versus 1.14 conceded by BUL at home, and over the season the hosts have conceded 28 goals versus 18 for the visitors. BUL, however, creates more chances at home: on average 14.54 shots and 4.92 on target per match with xG 1.86, while Kitara away records 11.15 shots, 4.31 on target and xG 1.61; the hosts' issue is efficiency — only 8% conversion and 43% of matches without scoring versus 36% for the visitors. The last 5 matches for both teams yield an identical record (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses, 1 point per match each), so form does not favor the hosts. Due to a better win record (16 vs 9), a lower goals-against rate and 50% away win rate, I forecast an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS as more likely 'No' due to the home side's defensive strengths: BUL has a seasonal goals conceded average of 0.46 and as many as 62% of matches ending in a clean sheet. Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates below the league average — BUL 31% and Kitara 36% versus league 38% — indicating a lower-than-average frequency of both teams scoring. Arguments for 'Yes' exist: Kitara has xG_for 1.61 and scored 5 goals in the last 5 matches (1.0 average) with BTTS in 40% of their last 5, while BUL scores 1.77 goals seasonally with xG 1.69 and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 20%, with 12.54 shots and 5.31 on target per home game. Consequently, despite some risk from the visitors' form (Kitara) and a short-term increase in BUL’s goals conceded to 1.2 per game over the last 5, the dominant seasonal figures (0.46 and 62%) and lower seasonal BTTS rates (31%/36%) favor 'No' (70%) over 'Yes' (30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG indicators for both teams are high: xG for BUL is 1.69 and for Kitara 1.61 (total 3.30). After accounting for defensive factors I project 1.56 goals for BUL and 1.44 for Kitara, i.e. roughly 3.00 goals in total. BUL averages 12.54 shots per match with 5.31 on target and a 14% conversion rate; Kitara averages 11.15 shots and 4.31 on target with a 9% conversion, which confirms both sides’ ability to create chances. Although BUL has 62% clean sheets and season over-2.5 rates are low (BUL 31%, Kitara 29%), the gap between xG (3.30) and actual scoring averages (BUL 1.77, Kitara 1.00, total 2.77) indicates potential for more goals in this fixture. A Poisson model on an expected total of 3.00 goals yields ~80% for Over 1.5, ~58% for Over 2.5 and ~35% for Over 3.5; therefore the strongest and most likely signal from the data is a play on Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts dominate at the break: they led at half-time in 10 of 13 matches (77%) and average 1.38 goals in the first half while conceding just 0.08, indicating strong control before the break. Over the full match they win 69% of games and average 1.77 goals per match versus the visitors' 1.00, while keeping a clean sheet in 62% of matches, which increases the likelihood of holding on to a lead. xG is similar (1.69 vs 1.61), but the hosts have better conversion (14% vs 9% for the visitors) and more shots on target (5.31 vs 4.31), supporting their efficiency. The visitors score only 0.50 goals on average by half-time and concede 0.50 by half-time, and the hosts have not been losing at half-time in any match (0%), so the scenario of the hosts leading after 45 minutes is dominant. Based on this I tip 1/1 as the strongest signal with about a 62% probability, while other options are much less likely (1/X 9%, X/X 15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| BUL | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kitara is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - BUL · 1.4 pts / game - Kitara
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitara is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.04 goals / game - BUL · 1.37 goals / game - Kitara
Kitara is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - BUL · 0.67 goals / game - Kitara
BUL scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 games), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 games).
Kitara scores in 74% of games (20 of 27 games), while BUL keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - BUL
Over / Under - Kitara
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitara is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / game - BUL · 2.04 pts / game - Kitara
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
BUL - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kitara - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 59% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
BUL
Kitara
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| BUL | Liga | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.04 | 2.07 | • 2.04 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 34% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 38% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 59% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 46% | 61% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from BUL's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kitara. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of BUL vs Kitara?
The Uganda Premier League match finished BUL 1:1 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before BUL vs Kitara?
BUL score 1.04 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.37. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 43% of BUL's matches and 33% of Kitara's.
What form are BUL and Kitara in?
Over the last 5 games BUL have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kitara 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BUL vs Kitara?
The statistical background for BUL vs Kitara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


