Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of October 17, 2026

BUL vs NEC: match statistics

BUL crest
BUL
0 : 1half-time 0:1
NEC crest
NEC

BUL vs NEC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

BUL played against NEC in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on April 28, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

BUL has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. NEC has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

BUL scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 1.08. NEC scores 1.00 and allows 0.64. Games in this league average 2.08 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 48% of BUL's games and 40% of NEC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 20%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

BUL has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.48 per game. BUL takes 11.1 shots per game, while NEC takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

BUL leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.48 goals per game after halftime. NEC leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.64 after halftime.

When the teams score

BUL's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). For NEC, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.08 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win ('2') because NEC has a clearly superior defense and current form: in their last 5 matches NEC conceded 0 goals, while BUL conceded 7. Away from home NEC concedes only 0.67 goals per game on average and keeps 50% clean sheets, whereas BUL at home concedes 1.25 goals on average and has 42% clean sheets. The hosts create more chances (home xG 1.87, 14.82 shots and 4.82 shots on target per game) but NEC’s away attack is less efficient (on average 0.83 goals and xG 1.44). The form gap reinforces the visitors’ edge: NEC earns 2.2 points per game in the last 5, with a 3-2-0 record, while BUL has only 1.0 point with a 1-2-2 record. Considering NEC’s defensive solidity (0 conceded in 5 matches, GA 0.67) and BUL’s recent defensive issues, I expect a narrow away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are 38% for BUL and 42% for NEC (average ~40%), meaning Both Teams To Score occurs in less than half of matches. Supporting the “No” scenario are high clean sheet percentages: home team 62%, away 50%, and 77% for the league overall, which increases the likelihood that at least one side will keep a clean sheet. Although xG shows 1.51 for BUL and 1.44 for NEC, actual goals per game are only 1.15 and 0.83 with conversion rates of 11% and 9%, indicating both teams fail to convert created chances into goals. The strongest signal is NEC’s form — 0% BTTS and 0 goals conceded in the last 5 matches — therefore I assign a 70% probability to No BTTS and 30% to BTTS (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined attacking xG of both teams is 1.51 + 1.44 = 2.95, and the xG conceded (1.50 for the home side and 1.22 for the away side) indicate a realistic goal-scoring potential; averaging these values and accounting for seasonal rates I estimate goals: home 1.28, away 1.21 (total 2.49). Seasonal goals averages are lower (home 1.15, away 0.83, total 1.98), but in the last 5 matches xG was 1.88 for the home team and 1.11 for the away team (combined 2.99), which shows an increase in chance creation. The home team has 62% clean sheets, the away team 50%, and BTTS is 38% / 42%, so both-teams-to-score is moderate (~40%). Seasonal over 2.5 rates are low (23% for home, 17% for away), therefore I assess Over 2.5 at about 45%, and Over 3.5 at about 24%. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (my estimates give ~71%), so I recommend backing the over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time a draw is most likely: the home team were level at the break in 62% of their matches and the visitors in 64%, and clean sheets at half-time occurred in 92% of homes and 82% of guests, suggesting frequent 0:0/1:1 scores at the interval. After 90 minutes the hosts are the favorites — they win 54% of matches versus 33% for the away side and score on average 1.15 goals per game compared to 0.83 for the visitors, with xG showing a slight edge of 1.51 against 1.44. Additionally the home side more often dominate second halves (they won the second half in 46% of matches, with 31% draws and 23% losses), so a lead at the break frequently turns into a home victory. On that basis I select HT/FT X/1 as the strongest signal; I rate X/1 at 34%, X/X at 20% and 1/1 at 18%, while away comebacks or early away leads are much less likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
BULNEC
6Shots5
BULNEC
3Shots on target2
BULNEC
1.23xG1.02
BULNEC
5Corners2
BULNEC
86Dangerous attacks75
BULNEC
-1Fouls-1
BULNEC
-1Cards-1
BULNEC

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.16Goals scored / game1
BULNEC
1.08Goals allowed / game0.64
BULNEC
47%Average possession48%
BULNEC
4.12Shots on target / game3.28
BULNEC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.12Shots per game9.28
BULNEC
4.12Shots on target3.28
BULNEC
10.4%Shot conversion10.8%
BULNEC
47%Possession48%
BULNEC
1.65xG for1.48
BULNEC
1.31xG against1.39
BULNEC

Shooting quality

BUL: BalancedNEC: Balanced
BULNEC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

NEC is 160% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - BUL · 2.6 pts / game - NEC

BUL
DLDLW
Season result split
36% W28% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-9
1.36 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
NEC
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
44% W40% D16% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-4
1.72 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BUL is 16% better for: goals scored per game.

1.16 goals / game - BUL · 1 goals / game - NEC

NEC is 69% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.08 goals / game - BUL · 0.64 goals / game - NEC

BUL scoring profile: mixed

BUL scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 games), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 56% (14 of 25 games).

NEC scoring profile: strong

NEC scores in 80% of games (20 of 25 games), while BUL keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 games).

29Goals scored (season)25
BULNEC
27Goals conceded (season)16
BULNEC
2.24Average goals per game1.64
BULNEC
5Goals scored (last 5)4
BULNEC
7Goals conceded (last 5)0
BULNEC

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal80%
BULNEC
24%2 goals16%
BULNEC
8%3 goals4%
BULNEC
4%4 goals0%
BULNEC

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal44%
BULNEC
28%2 goals16%
BULNEC
12%3 goals4%
BULNEC
4%4 goals0%
BULNEC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time4%
BULNEC
4%BTTS in both halves0%
BULNEC
12%Scored in both halves8%
BULNEC

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
BULNEC
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BULNEC
40%BTTS - last 50%
BULNEC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
BULNEC
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
BULNEC
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
BULNEC

2nd half

52%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
BULNEC
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
BULNEC
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
BULNEC

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BUL - half-time state
32% leading48% draw20% trailing
NEC - half-time state
28% leading64% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per game (1st half)1.48
BULNEC
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.36
BULNEC
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.12
BULNEC
1.2Average goals (1st half)0.48
BULNEC
60%Clean sheet before half-time88%
BULNEC
48%No goal before half-time68%
BULNEC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per game (2nd half)1.6
BULNEC
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
BULNEC
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
BULNEC
0.96Average goals (2nd half)1.12
BULNEC
68%Clean sheet after half-time68%
BULNEC
64%No goal after half-time44%
BULNEC

BUL - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
36
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

NEC - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
37
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

BUL - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.4
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
NEC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.20
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

BUL
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
12
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

NEC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
4
5
46-60
7
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.94
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

BUL

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

BULLigaNEC
Average goals per game▲ 2.242.08▼ 1.64
Both teams scored▲ 48%38%▲ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 36%35%▼ 20%
Clean sheets▲ 40%38%▲ 56%
Goal before half-time▲ 68%59%▼ 40%
Goal after half-time▼ 52%60%▲ 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per game
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / game
0.80
Away goals / game
+60%
Home attack advantage
+38%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from BUL's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against NEC. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

NEC
1 : 1
BUL

FAQ

What was the result of BUL vs NEC?

The Uganda Premier League match finished BUL 0:1 NEC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before BUL vs NEC?

BUL score 1.16 goals per game on average and NEC 1.00. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 48% of BUL's matches and 40% of NEC's.

What form are BUL and NEC in?

Over the last 5 games BUL have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and NEC 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BUL vs NEC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for BUL vs NEC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.