South Korea - K League 2Busan Gudeok StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Busan I'Park vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Busan I'Park crest
Busan I'Park
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Busan I'Park vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Busan I'Park play Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 12 July 2026 at 12:30. Venue: Busan Gudeok Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Busan I'Park: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Busan I'Park scores 2.06 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Busan I'Park 71%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Busan I'Park 65%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Busan I'Park: 13.0 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.3.

Match halves

Busan I'Park: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 1.12. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Busan I'Park: 76-90+ (12 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I expect a home win: Busan I'Park have 10 wins this season and lead the table, scoring 33 goals versus Gimpo's 19, indicating a clear offensive advantage. At home Busan averages 2.14 goals and 0% clean-sheetless matches, with 5 shots on target per game and an 18% conversion rate, while Gimpo away averages 1.31 goals, 4.08 shots on target and a 12% conversion. Recent 5-game form is mixed — Busan scored 12 and conceded 9 in the last five, Gimpo scored 6 and conceded 5, with Gimpo averaging 2.0 points per game versus 1.6 for Busan. Gimpo has the edge in possession (50% vs 44%) and is solid away (0.92 goals conceded and 38% clean sheets on the road), but Busan’s key strengths are efficiency and an unbeaten home record (0% losses and 71% home wins). Based on this I assess the probabilities as: Home 62%, Draw 20%, Away 18%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
10Shots16
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
4Shots on target2
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
1.34xG1.6
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
5Corners4
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
59Dangerous attacks63
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
8Fouls10
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
2Cards2
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
2.06Goals scored / match1.18
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
1.24Goals conceded / match1.12
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
47%Average possession50%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
4.76Shots on target / match4
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match12.29
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
4.76Shots on target4
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
15.8%Shot conversion9.6%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
47%Possession50%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
1.52xG for1.52
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
1.56xG against1.27
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Busan I'Park: Counter-attackingGimpo Citizen: Balanced
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)37%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Busan I'Park is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Busan I'Park · 1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Busan I'Park
WDDWL
Season result split
65% W18% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-3
2.12 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Busan I'Park is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

2.06 goals / match - Busan I'Park · 1.18 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gimpo Citizen is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Busan I'Park · 1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Busan I'Park scoring profile: very strong

Busan I'Park scores in 94% of matches (16 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Busan I'Park keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

35Goals scored (season)20
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
21Goals conceded (season)19
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
3.29Average goals in match2.29
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
11Goals scored (last 5)5
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal76%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
76%2 goals29%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
29%3 goals12%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
6%4 goals0%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal71%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
29%2 goals35%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
18%3 goals6%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time29%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
29%Scored in both halves24%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
60%BTTS - last 560%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

94%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Busan I'Park is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.82 pts / match - Busan I'Park · 1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Busan I'Park - half-time state
53% leading24% draw24% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.82Points per match (1st half)1.24
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
1.59Average goals (1st half)1.06
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
29%No goal before half-time59%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
1.12Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
47%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen
47%No goal after half-time41%
Busan I'ParkGimpo Citizen

Busan I'Park - second-half results

41% W47% R12% P
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Busan I'Park - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Busan I'Park
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
2
4
16-30
9
6
31-45
1
3
46-60
6
2
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Busan I'Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Busan I'ParkLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 3.292.75 2.29
Both teams scored 71%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%56% 35%
Clean sheets 24%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 94%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 65%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Busan I'Park 1 - 1 - 1 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Busan I'Park
4 : 1
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
3 : 0
Busan I'Park
Busan I'Park
0 : 0
Gimpo Citizen FC

FAQ

What was the result of Busan I'Park vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Busan I'Park 2:0 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Busan I'Park and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Busan I'Park won 1, Gimpo Citizen won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Busan I'Park vs Gimpo Citizen?

Busan I'Park score 2.06 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Busan I'Park's matches and 53% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Busan I'Park and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Busan I'Park have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Busan I'Park vs Gimpo Citizen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Busan I'Park vs Gimpo Citizen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.