Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Buxoro vs Pakhtakor: match statistics

Buxoro crest
Buxoro
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Pakhtakor crest
Pakhtakor

Buxoro vs Pakhtakor: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Buxoro played against Pakhtakor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on April 22, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Buxoro has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Pakhtakor has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Buxoro scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.13. Pakhtakor scores 2.25 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.51 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Buxoro's games and 63% of Pakhtakor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 63%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Pakhtakor has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.38 per game. Buxoro takes 11.5 shots per game, while Pakhtakor takes 13.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Buxoro leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Pakhtakor leads at halftime in 38% and scores 1.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

Buxoro's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Pakhtakor, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.51 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pakhtakor are in outstanding form — won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 14 goals in that period, while this season they have 7 wins and 18 goals versus Buxoro’s 12 goals. Home side record a 75% win rate at home, remain unbeaten at their stadium, score on average 1.75 goals and concede just 0.5 per game with 50% clean sheets. Visitors have a 100% win rate away, score 2.33 on average and concede 1.0, with average possession of 52% and shot conversion 21% versus 15% for the hosts; Buxoro register more shots on target (5.5 vs 4.0) but are less efficient. Looking at xG, Buxoro at home have xG 1.51 and xGA 1.30, while Pakhtakor away xG is 1.29 — Pakhtakor converts that xG into 2.33 goals per game, whereas Buxoro concede only 0.5 despite xGA 1.30, indicating greater efficiency from the visitors and some element of luck for the hosts. Given the perfect run of 5 wins, higher efficiency and greater recent goal output (14 vs 9), I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) scenario looks more likely: seasonal BTTS rates are 60% for Buxoro and 67% for Pakhtakor, and in the last 5 matches both teams have 80% BTTS. Both sides regularly score and concede — Buxoro averages 2.2 scored and 1.2 conceded per match, Pakhtakor 2.33 scored and 1.0 conceded; in the last 5 matches the averages are 1.8 scored and 1.6 conceded for Buxoro and 2.8 and 1.2 for Pakhtakor. xG and shot counts confirm scoring potential: Buxoro has xG 1.74 with xG against 1.21, Pakhtakor xG 1.29 with xG against 1.24; the hosts average 14.2 shots and 6 on target, the visitors 11.33 and 4 on target, and Pakhtakor shows higher conversion 21% versus Buxoro's 15%. Clean sheets are rare (20% for Buxoro and 33% for Pakhtakor), the league has 50% BTTS and an average of 2.5 goals per match, and the combination of over 2.5 goals and BTTS occurs for both teams in 60–67% of games, which strengthens the both-sides-to-score signal. Considering all these figures (60%/67% seasonal BTTS, 80% in last 5, goal averages and xG), I assign 80% to 'yes' and 20% to 'no' as the most credible prediction.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams possess strong offenses — Buxoro scores an average of 2.2 goals per match, Pakhtakor 2.33, with seasonal xG of 1.74 and 1.29 respectively. Defensive indicators suggest matches often see goals at both ends: in 60% of Buxoro’s games and 67% of Pakhtakor’s games both teams scored, and the percentage of matches over 1.5 goals is 100% for the home side and 67% for the away side. In the last 5 matches Pakhtakor scored 14 goals (2.8 avg) with last5 xG 1.65, while Buxoro has 9 goals (1.8) and last5 xG 1.45; I estimate expected xG around 1.58 for Buxoro and 1.40 for Pakhtakor, total ≈2.98. Season Over/Under stats also favor goals: Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of Buxoro’s matches and 67% of Pakhtakor’s, and Over 3.5 at 40% and 33% respectively — based on this I rate Over 2.5 at ~67% probability and Over 3.5 at ~35%. Therefore the best line to play is Over 1.5: both teams have high scoring efficiency, frequent BTTS occurrences, and an expected total close to 3 gives this market a clear edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis suggests a halftime draw: Buxoro posts an xG of 1.74 versus Pakhtakor’s 1.29 and scores on average 1.2 goals by the break compared to the visitors’ 0.67, but HT draws are common (home sides were level at the break in 60% of matches, visitors in 67%), and hosts led at the break in only 40% of games versus the visitors’ 33%. Pakhtakor is, however, stronger in the decisive phase — season-long points per match average 3.0 versus 2.4 for Buxoro, and in the last five matches the visitors have won 5/5 (100%) while the hosts have a 40% win rate. Efficiency favors Pakhtakor: shot conversion 21% versus the hosts’ 15%, with an average of 4 shots on target per match for the visitors versus 6 for Buxoro, indicating effectiveness with fewer chances. The second half should decide the match — average goals after the break are 1.8 for the hosts and 2.33 for the visitors, and Pakhtakor scores on average 1.67 goals after the break, so the scenario of a halftime draw and an away win after the break (X/2) is the strongest. On this basis I assign X/2 30%, 1/2 18% (a turnaround by the visitors after the hosts led), and 1/1 16% as a realistic alternative based on home advantage at the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
BuxoroPakhtakor
5Shots8
BuxoroPakhtakor
2Shots on target1
BuxoroPakhtakor
0.92xG0.95
BuxoroPakhtakor
2Corners6
BuxoroPakhtakor
63Dangerous attacks51
BuxoroPakhtakor
17Fouls16
BuxoroPakhtakor
5Cards2
BuxoroPakhtakor

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.5Goals scored / game2.25
BuxoroPakhtakor
1.13Goals allowed / game1.13
BuxoroPakhtakor
45%Average possession60%
BuxoroPakhtakor
4.63Shots on target / game5.25
BuxoroPakhtakor

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.5Shots per game13.13
BuxoroPakhtakor
4.63Shots on target5.25
BuxoroPakhtakor
13%Shot conversion17.1%
BuxoroPakhtakor
45%Possession60%
BuxoroPakhtakor
1.38xG for1.57
BuxoroPakhtakor
1.49xG against1.22
BuxoroPakhtakor

Shooting quality

Buxoro: Counter-attackingPakhtakor: Efficient finishing
BuxoroPakhtakor
Accuracy (shots on target)40%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Pakhtakor is 114% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Buxoro · 3 pts / game - Pakhtakor

Buxoro
WLWDL
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-2
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Pakhtakor
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
88% W0% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-0-1
2.63 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 away
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pakhtakor is 50% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - Buxoro · 2.25 goals / game - Pakhtakor

Buxoro scoring profile: very strong

Buxoro scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 meczów), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 meczów).

Pakhtakor scoring profile: very strong

Pakhtakor scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 meczów).

12Goals scored (season)18
BuxoroPakhtakor
9Goals conceded (season)9
BuxoroPakhtakor
2.63Average goals per game3.38
BuxoroPakhtakor
9Goals scored (last 5)14
BuxoroPakhtakor
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
BuxoroPakhtakor

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal88%
BuxoroPakhtakor
38%2 goals75%
BuxoroPakhtakor
13%3 goals38%
BuxoroPakhtakor
0%4 goals25%
BuxoroPakhtakor

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal75%
BuxoroPakhtakor
25%2 goals38%
BuxoroPakhtakor
25%3 goals0%
BuxoroPakhtakor
0%4 goals0%
BuxoroPakhtakor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
BuxoroPakhtakor
0%BTTS in both halves13%
BuxoroPakhtakor
13%Scored in both halves38%
BuxoroPakhtakor

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
BuxoroPakhtakor
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
BuxoroPakhtakor
80%BTTS - last 580%
BuxoroPakhtakor

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
BuxoroPakhtakor
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
BuxoroPakhtakor
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
BuxoroPakhtakor

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
BuxoroPakhtakor
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
BuxoroPakhtakor
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
BuxoroPakhtakor

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pakhtakor is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Buxoro · 1.75 pts / game - Pakhtakor

Buxoro - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
Pakhtakor - half-time state
38% leading63% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.75
BuxoroPakhtakor
0.75Goals scored (1st half)1
BuxoroPakhtakor
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
BuxoroPakhtakor
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.38
BuxoroPakhtakor
63%Clean sheet before half-time75%
BuxoroPakhtakor
38%No goal before half-time38%
BuxoroPakhtakor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.75
BuxoroPakhtakor
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
BuxoroPakhtakor
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
BuxoroPakhtakor
1.13Average goals (2nd half)2
BuxoroPakhtakor
63%Clean sheet after half-time38%
BuxoroPakhtakor
50%No goal after half-time38%
BuxoroPakhtakor

Buxoro - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Pakhtakor - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
14
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding232%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 88%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Buxoro - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.60
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game1.20.4
Average goals per game2.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Pakhtakor - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.60
Goals scored / game1.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game2.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Buxoro
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Pakhtakor
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
5
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+66%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
88%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Buxoro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Pakhtakor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
188%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

BuxoroLigaPakhtakor
Average goals per game 2.632.51 3.38
Both teams scored 63%51% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%49% 63%
Clean sheets 38%27% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%68% 63%
Goal after half-time 75%80% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / game
1.20
Away goals / game
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PakhtakorGoalBashar Rasan Bonyan
  2. PakhtakorYellow cardSanjar Kuvvatov
  3. PakhtakorYellow cardMuhammadrasul Abdumajidov
  4. BuxoroYellow cardKhurshidbek Mukhtarov
  5. BuxoroSubstitutionOn: Muhammad YuldoshevOff: Khurshidbek Mukhtarov
  6. BuxoroYellow cardAnvar Juraev
  7. BuxoroSubstitutionOn: Anvar JuraevOff: Javokhir Ro'ziyev
  8. BuxoroSubstitutionOn: Asilbek QayumovOff: Vladimir Rodić
  9. BuxoroYellow cardDominik Begić
  10. PakhtakorSubstitutionOn: Flamarion Jovino FilhoOff: Bashar Rasan Bonyan
  11. BuxoroRed cardShakhboz Djurabekov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Buxoro's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Pakhtakor. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Buxoro FK
0 : 4
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
FK Pakhtakor Tashkent
6 : 0
Buxoro FK

FAQ

What was the result of Buxoro vs Pakhtakor?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Buxoro 0:1 Pakhtakor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Buxoro and Pakhtakor?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Buxoro won 0, Pakhtakor won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Buxoro vs Pakhtakor?

Buxoro score 1.50 goals per game on average and Pakhtakor 2.25. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Buxoro's matches and 63% of Pakhtakor's.

What form are Buxoro and Pakhtakor in?

Over the last 5 games Buxoro have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Pakhtakor 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Buxoro vs Pakhtakor?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Buxoro vs Pakhtakor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.