Buxoro vs Qizilqum: match statistics
Buxoro vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Buxoro played against Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on April 9, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Buxoro has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Qizilqum has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Buxoro scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 1.00. Qizilqum scores 0.80 and allows 1.60. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Buxoro's games and 20% of Qizilqum's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 40%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Buxoro has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.10 per game. Buxoro takes 12.4 shots per game, while Qizilqum takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Buxoro leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Qizilqum leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Buxoro's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Qizilqum, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Buxoro are favorites at home: they record a 67% win rate on their own turf, averaging 1.67 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per match, and in the last 5 matches they have scored 7 goals and won 3 of 5 (form: W W D W L). Qizilqum are more inconsistent away — they have 2 away wins and 3 defeats this season, averaging 1.00 goal scored and 1.00 conceded, and as many as 50% of away matches without scoring. The quality gap is shown by xG and shot metrics: Buxoro at home have xG 1.62 with 5.67 shots on target and 12.67 total shots, while the visitors away post xG 1.11 with 3 on target and 9 total. Defensively the hosts also look better on averages (0.67 conceded per home match versus 1.00 for Qizilqum), although the visitors have 50% clean sheets away; the visitors’ goal balance of 4–8 however indicates vulnerability. Considering PPG in the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.2), higher conversion (13% vs 11%) and superior shot and xG metrics, I give Buxoro the higher probability of winning.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor BTTS (Both Teams To Score — Yes) as the more likely outcome — 60% vs 40%. Both teams produce similar xG: 1.09 for Buxoro and 1.11 for Qizilqum, and the average on-target shots are 1.67 vs 3.0, indicating chance creation at both ends. Both defenses also concede a fair number of opportunities: xG against is 1.39 (Buxoro) and 1.64 (Qizilqum), and Buxoro concedes on average 2.0 goals per season with 0% clean sheets expected, which increases the likelihood of the opponent scoring. In the last 5 matches Buxoro had BTTS in 60% of games and averaged 1.4 goals, while Qizilqum had BTTS in 20% of their last 5 and averaged 0.8 goals — this shows the home side’s advantage in creating goals but also the visitors’ potential to respond. Considering the league average BTTS of 44% and Qizilqum’s conversion rate of 11% with 3.0 on-target shots, the Both Teams To Score scenario looks more probable than a No Goal/clean sheet for either side.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are 1.46 for Buxoro and 1.27 for Qizilqum (total 2.73), calculated from last 5 matches xG: home xG_for 1.45 vs away defense xG_against 1.47, and away xG_for 1.13 vs home defense xG_against 1.40. The 2.73 total is above the league average 2.44 and exceeds the 2.5 line, and the home side have 67% of home matches Over 2.5, which strengthens the Over signal. Countering that, the visitors have 50% clean sheets on the road and season-long 0% Over2.5 home/away, which weakens the outlook for a very high-scoring game (e.g. Over 3.5). Additionally, the away team are more clinical in finishing (3.0 SOT and 11% conversion vs home 1.67 SOT and 6% conversion), so with similar xG this increases the probability of additional goals. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Over at the 2.5 line (hence the pick Over 2.5) with a high probability for Over 1.5 and a moderate probability for Over 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Qizilqum leading at half-time and the away team winning (2/2). Qizilqum were leading at the break in 50% of matches, while Buxoro were trailing at half-time in 67% of their games, which strongly favors HT=2. The visitors have a slightly higher xG (1.11 vs 1.09) and average 3.0 shots on target versus the hosts' 1.67, with a higher shot conversion rate (11% vs 6%), so they are more efficient at creating and finishing chances. Buxoro concede on average 1.0 goals before the break and as hosts have yet to keep a clean sheet this season (0% half-time clean sheets), whereas Qizilqum have not conceded before half-time in the season stats (100% half-time clean sheets), therefore I assign 32% to 2/2 and 22% to the alternative X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Buxoro | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Buxoro is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Buxoro · 1.2 pts / game - Qizilqum
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Buxoro is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Buxoro · 0.8 goals / game - Qizilqum
Buxoro is 60% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Buxoro · 1.6 goals / game - Qizilqum
Buxoro scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
Qizilqum scores in 40% of games (2 of 5 meczów), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Buxoro
Over / Under - Qizilqum
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Buxoro - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Qizilqum - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Buxoro
Qizilqum
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Buxoro | Liga | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.40 | 2.43 | • 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 48% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 48% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 28% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 65% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 80% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Buxoro's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Qizilqum. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Buxoro vs Qizilqum?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Buxoro 2:0 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Buxoro and Qizilqum?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Buxoro won 1, Qizilqum won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Buxoro vs Qizilqum?
Buxoro score 1.40 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.80. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Buxoro's matches and 20% of Qizilqum's.
What form are Buxoro and Qizilqum in?
Over the last 5 games Buxoro have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Qizilqum 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Buxoro vs Qizilqum?
The statistical background for Buxoro vs Qizilqum — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


