Mexico - Ascenso MXData current as of September 13, 2026

CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero: match statistics

CA La Paz crest
CA La Paz
1 : 2half-time 1:1
CDS Tampico Madero crest
CDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

CA La Paz played against CDS Tampico Madero in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

CA La Paz has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. CDS Tampico Madero has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

CA La Paz scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 1.52. CDS Tampico Madero scores 1.37 and allows 0.91. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 59% of CA La Paz's games and 54% of CDS Tampico Madero's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 40%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

CA La Paz has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.37 per game. CA La Paz takes 13.0 shots per game, while CDS Tampico Madero takes 12.1.

First-half and second-half trends

CA La Paz leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. CDS Tampico Madero leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.74 after halftime.

When the teams score

CA La Paz's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). For CDS Tampico Madero, it is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ascenso MX games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Visitors are in markedly better form: in the last 5 matches they scored 7 goals, won 3 and drew 2, averaging 2.2 points per game; hosts scored only 4 goals, failed to win (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses) and average 0.6 points per game over that period. In the season CDS Tampico Madero has 19 wins and 48 goals versus CA La Paz’s 9 wins and 47 goals, indicating the visitors’ advantage in wins and consistency. Hosts, however, dominate creation at home: on average 16.07 shots and 7.07 on target per match, 57% possession, xG 1.91 and 1.86 home goals per match with only 7% of matches without scoring; visitors away average 9.53 shots, 3.47 on target, xG 1.19, 1.00 goal and 29% of matches without scoring. Defensively the advantage lies with the visitors — they concede 1.06 goals on average away and only 3 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas hosts concede 1.43 goals at home. Considering the superior win record (19 vs 9), clearly better recent points average (2.2 vs 0.6) and the visitors’ solid defense, I tip a visitor victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for CA La Paz and 59% for CDS Tampico Madero, versus a league average of 56%, indicating an overall trend favoring both teams to score. In the last 5 matches the signal is stronger: the home side has BTTS in 80% of games and the visitors in 60%; CA La Paz conceded an average of 1.6 goals per game in the last 5, while Tampico averaged 1.4 goals scored. xG stats show the home team with attack xG 1.55 and the visitors with xG against 1.62; additionally, in the last 5 matches the home side’s xG against was 1.81, increasing the risk of conceded goals. The hosts average 4.56 shots on target versus the visitors’ 3.47 and have a seasonal finishing rate of 12% against the opponents’ 10%, while clean sheets are only 39% and 29% — a low level that reduces the chance of a No Goal. Considering the above numbers and trends, the most reasonable pick is BTTS = Yes with an estimated probability of 70%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG the home side have about 1.59 xG (xG_for 1.55; opponent xG_against 1.62 -> avg 1.59), while the visitors have 1.05 xG (xG_for 1.19; home xG_against 0.91 -> 1.05), giving ~2.64 expected goals in total. A simple Poisson model therefore indicates ~74% probability for Over 1.5 and ~49% for Over 2.5 (Over 3.5 only ~27%). Seasonal data support Over 1.5: CA La Paz have Over 1.5 in 61% of matches and Over 0.5 in 94%, Tampico have Over 1.5 in 59% and Over 0.5 in 82%, while Over 2.5 is less certain (44%/35% for home/away, league 54%). In the last 5 matches the home team averaged 0.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while the visitors averaged 1.4 scored and 0.6 conceded, which further increases the likelihood of goals from Tampico. Considering the 2.64 expected goals, the high Over 0.5 rates (94%/82%) and the probability distribution, the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

CA La Paz has a clear home-season advantage: 72% home wins, an average of 1.72 goals scored at home and xG 1.55 versus 1.19 away. At Half-Time both teams usually play cautiously — the hosts were level at the break in 50% of home matches and average 0.67 goals by Half-Time, while the visitors average 0.59 goals by Half-Time, which favors a draw at the break. The decisive factor is the second 45 minutes: the hosts score on average 1.06 goals in the second half compared to just 0.41 for the visitors, and the hosts win second halves in 61% of cases versus 18% for the visitors, indicating a late advantage. Although the visitors are in much better recent form over the last five matches (60% wins) and led at Half-Time in 60% of those games, the overall seasonal record and superiority in xG and shot volume (14.61 vs 9.53) suggest La Paz can engineer a turnaround after the break. Therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win after 90 minutes (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

65Possession (%)35
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
27Shots10
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
12Shots on target7
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
3.06xG1.33
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
7Corners2
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
74Dangerous attacks29
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
14Fouls14
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
5Cards4
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.62Goals scored / game1.37
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.52Goals allowed / game0.91
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
54%Average possession52%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
5.31Shots on target / game4.03
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game12.14
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
5.31Shots on target4.03
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
12.5%Shot conversion11.3%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
54%Possession52%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.55xG for1.37
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.68xG against1.27
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Shooting quality

CA La Paz: BalancedCDS Tampico Madero: Balanced
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

CDS Tampico Madero is 267% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - CA La Paz · 2.2 pts / game - CDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz
DLDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
31% W41% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-8
1.34 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
CDS Tampico Madero
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
54% W29% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
19-10-6
1.91 pts / game · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CA La Paz is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.62 goals / game - CA La Paz · 1.37 goals / game - CDS Tampico Madero

CDS Tampico Madero is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.52 goals / game - CA La Paz · 0.91 goals / game - CDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz scoring profile: very strong

CA La Paz scores in 83% of games (24 of 29 meczów), while CDS Tampico Madero keeps a clean sheet in 34% (12 of 35 meczów).

CDS Tampico Madero scoring profile: very strong

CDS Tampico Madero scores in 77% of games (27 of 35 meczów), while CA La Paz keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 meczów).

47Goals scored (season)48
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
44Goals conceded (season)32
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
3.14Average goals per game2.29
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
4Goals scored (last 5)7
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal77%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
48%2 goals40%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
28%3 goals17%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
3%4 goals3%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal66%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
45%2 goals17%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
21%3 goals6%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
7%4 goals3%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
CDS Tampico Madero - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 35 meczów
56%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time17%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
14%BTTS in both halves6%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
31%Scored in both halves31%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
80%BTTS - last 560%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
28%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CDS Tampico Madero is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / game - CA La Paz · 1.6 pts / game - CDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz - half-time state
38% leading34% draw28% trailing
CDS Tampico Madero - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per game (1st half)1.6
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.63
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.37
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.66Average goals (1st half)1
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
52%Clean sheet before half-time63%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
38%No goal before half-time51%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

After half-time (2nd half)

1.34Points per game (2nd half)1.54
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.29
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
45%Clean sheet after half-time57%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
48%No goal after half-time40%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz - second-half results

31% W41% D28% L
43
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 31%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CDS Tampico Madero - second-half results

40% W34% D26% L
56
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CA La Paz - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
CDS Tampico Madero - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.20
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

CA La Paz
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
6
9
16-30
13
9
31-45
4
8
46-60
6
7
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

CDS Tampico Madero
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
11
3
16-30
8
6
31-45
12
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

CA La Paz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

CDS Tampico Madero

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).

Teams vs league

CA La PazLigaCDS Tampico Madero
Average goals per game 3.142.88 2.29
Both teams scored 59%56% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%53% 40%
Clean sheets 28%26% 34%
Goal before half-time 79%75% 69%
Goal after half-time 76%81% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defensive advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CDS Tampico MaderoGoalEdson Enrique Torres Ulloa
  2. CDS Tampico MaderoYellow cardJesús Alonso Escoboza Lugo
  3. CDS Tampico MaderoYellow cardJosé Alberto López González
  4. CDS Tampico MaderoGoalLuis Salvador Razo Miranda
  5. CDS Tampico MaderoYellow cardEdson Enrique Torres Ulloa
  6. CA La PazYellow cardIvo Saúl Vázquez Serrano
  7. CDS Tampico MaderoSubstitutionOn: José Alfredo Peralta SotoOff: Edson Enrique Torres Ulloa
  8. CDS Tampico MaderoYellow cardSergio Adrián Flores Reyes

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jesús Enrique Herrera ArmentaMatches officiated: 11
7.64Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins36%Draws27%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from CA La Paz's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against CDS Tampico Madero. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

The Ascenso MX match finished CA La Paz 1:2 CDS Tampico Madero. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CA La Paz and CDS Tampico Madero?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CA La Paz won 0, CDS Tampico Madero won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

CA La Paz score 1.62 goals per game on average and CDS Tampico Madero 1.37. The Ascenso MX average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of CA La Paz's matches and 54% of CDS Tampico Madero's.

What form are CA La Paz and CDS Tampico Madero in?

Over the last 5 games CA La Paz have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and CDS Tampico Madero 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

The statistical background for CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.