Cacahuatique vs Águila: match statistics
Cacahuatique vs Águila: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cacahuatique played against Águila in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Cacahuatique has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Águila has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Cacahuatique scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 1.40. Águila scores 1.33 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Cacahuatique's games and 48% of Águila's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 46%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Águila has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.38 per game. Cacahuatique takes 8.6 shots per game, while Águila takes 9.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.51 goals per game after halftime. Águila leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cacahuatique's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Águila, it is minutes 16-30 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Águila is the favorite for this match and I recommend a '2'. Over the season Águila has 22 wins versus Cacahuatique’s 13, with 61 goals scored and 53 conceded, while the hosts have 53 scored and 63 conceded. The visitors are in better form — in their last 5 matches Águila have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring 4 and conceding 4 goals (1.4 points per game), whereas Cacahuatique are 0-2-3 in that period, 3 scored and 8 conceded (0.4 points per game). The visitors’ defense looks more solid: the home side concede on average 1.55 goals per home match, Águila concede 1.05 on the road and keep a clean sheet in 41% of matches versus 27% for the hosts. Attacks are similar in chance creation (≈9.6 shots and 4.05–4.09 on target per game, conversion around 11%), so the weaker defense and poorer form of the hosts are decisive factors, which supports backing an Águila win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics slightly favor a BTTS scenario: Cacahuatique has a season BTTS rate of 63% versus Águila's 32%, and in the last 5 matches 60% vs 20% respectively. The hosts score on average 1.54 goals this season and conceded on average 1.6 goals in their last 5 matches (8 conceded), while Águila has a season scoring average of 1.09 and failed to score in 36% of matches. On the other hand Águila has generated higher xG in the last 5 matches (1.83 vs 1.10 for the hosts) and season xG_for is relatively close (1.39 vs 1.54), which increases the visitors' real chance of scoring. Additionally Águila keeps a clean sheet in 41% of matches versus Cacahuatique's 25%, introducing risk of No Goal; however, combining the hosts' higher seasonal BTTS, their 63 goals conceded this season and an advantage in shots on target (4.52 vs 4.09), I rate BTTS - Yes at 60% and No Goal at 40% as the most likely scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-defensive model projects expected goals of 1.32 for Cacahuatique and 1.27 for Águila, totaling 2.59. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.59 yields an approximate probability of ~73% for Over 1.5, consistent with seasonal Over 1.5 rates: 79% for the home side and 64% for the away side (avg ~72%). Over 2.5 has weaker support (~48% per the model; seasonally 58% for hosts vs 32% for visitors), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~26%; seasonally 21% and 14%). Additionally, hosts average 4.52 shots on target and 1.54 xG, Águila averages 4.09 shots on target and 1.39 xG, and Over 0.5 occurrence is 100% and 91%, respectively, which favors at least two goals. Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal given the consistency of seasonal percentages and the model probability of ~73%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/X (Cacahuatique leading at the break, draw at full-time). Cacahuatique led at the break in 11 matches (48%) and averages 1.0 goals in the first half versus 0.36 for Águila, while hosts have 38 first-half goals compared to 17 for the visitors, which strongly supports a home lead at the break. However, Águila is more dangerous after the break — the visitors scored as many as 9 goals in minutes 61–75 and have a 40% win rate in the last 5 matches versus 0% for the hosts, and the hosts concede an average of 1.2 goals in the second half over the last five games, increasing the chance of a turnaround. Additionally, xG is similar (1.54 for Cacahuatique vs 1.39 for Águila) and the hosts have higher shot conversion (15% vs 11%), which explains the lead at half-time, but the hosts’ seasonal BTTS rate of 63% suggests a goal after the break as well; hence the strongest single signal is for 1/X.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cacahuatique | Águila | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Águila is 250% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 1.4 pts / game - Águila
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Águila is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.18 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 1.33 goals / game - Águila
Águila is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.4 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 1.15 goals / game - Águila
Cacahuatique scores in 73% of games (33 of 45 games), while Águila keeps a clean sheet in 33% (15 of 46 games).
Águila scores in 76% of games (35 of 46 games), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (13 of 45 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
Over / Under - Águila
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Águila - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cacahuatique
Águila
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Cacahuatique | Liga | Águila | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.58 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 54% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 51% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 79% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Cacahuatique's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Águila. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cacahuatique vs Águila?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 0:0 Águila. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and Águila?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 1, Águila won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs Águila?
Cacahuatique score 1.18 goals per game on average and Águila 1.33. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Cacahuatique's matches and 48% of Águila's.
What form are Cacahuatique and Águila in?
Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Águila 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs Águila?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.