El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of October 22, 2026

Cacahuatique vs CD Platense: match statistics

Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
1 : 2half-time 0:2
CD Platense crest
CD Platense

Cacahuatique vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cacahuatique played against CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Cacahuatique has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. CD Platense has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Cacahuatique scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 1.71. CD Platense scores 1.14 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 71% of Cacahuatique's games and 57% of CD Platense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 43%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cacahuatique has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.32 per game. Cacahuatique takes 9.9 shots per game, while CD Platense takes 7.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. CD Platense leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.71 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cacahuatique's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For CD Platense, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cacahuatique have failed to win any of their last five matches, drawing four of them, which significantly increases the likelihood of a stalemate. At home, the hosts average 1.8 goals scored but concede 2.2, while their xG stands at just 1.29 compared with 1.67 allowed to opponents. CD Platense have been more effective recently, scoring 6 goals and winning 2 of their last five matches, but they remain without an away win and have drawn 67% of their matches on the road. The visitors show better defensive organization away from home, conceding an average of 1.0 goals with an against xG of 1.16; however, they create few chances themselves, recording an average xG of 0.77 and just 0.67 goals scored per match. Cacahuatique’s advantage in chance creation and Platense’s poor away attack offset the visitors’ stronger recent form, making a draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Cacahuatique have a clear attacking advantage at home: they average 1.73 xG and record 6.75 shots on target per match, while CD Platense manage only 0.77 xG and 1.67 shots on target away from home. The visitors score just 0.67 goals on average, and although their output has improved to 1.2 goals over their last five matches, their scoring potential remains limited. Cacahuatique concede an average of 1.5 goals and have failed to keep a clean sheet in 75% of their matches, but Platense’s weak attack reduces the chances of exploiting this vulnerability. BTTS - Yes has landed in 60% of the hosts’ last five matches, but in only 40% of the visitors’ games, while the league average stands at 49%. The most likely scenario is therefore that the hosts will score, while at least one team—primarily Platense—will fail to find the net, supporting BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Cacahuatique creates significantly more chances, averaging 11.75 shots and 6.75 shots on target, compared with Platense’s 2.67 shots and 1.67 shots on target per match. The hosts have an average xG of 1.73, while the visitors’ attack produces just 0.77 xG, limiting the projection for Platense to around 0.88 goals. On a season-long basis, 75% of Cacahuatique’s matches and all of Platense’s away matches finished with fewer than 3.5 goals, while neither team has recorded a match with more than 4.5 goals. The last five matches provide more open xG signals, at 1.46 and 1.45 respectively, but Cacahuatique’s actual return was just 4 goals over that period. The projected total of 2.33 goals gives the strongest edge to Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and at full-time, as Cacahuatique were level at the break in 3 of their 4 home matches, while CD Platense recorded a half-time draw in 60% of their last five games. The hosts’ recent form clearly limits their advantage: they have failed to win any of their previous five matches, drawing 80% of them, whereas the visitors recorded 2 wins over the same period. The first halves should be cautious, as the hosts averaged just 0.2 goals scored in their last five matches, while both teams conceded 0.4 goals per game. However, Cacahuatique have stronger full-season home figures, averaging 1.50 goals scored and an xG of 1.73, compared with Platense’s 0.67 goals and 0.77 xG away from home, reducing the likelihood of an away win. A full-time draw is also supported by Platense’s profile, as they have drawn 67% of their away matches this season.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
8Shots9
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
3Shots on target2
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.36xG1.32
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
6Corners4
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
88Dangerous attacks85
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
18Fouls14
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0Cards0
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.43Goals scored / game1.14
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.71Goals allowed / game1.29
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
49%Average possession49%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
3.86Shots on target / game4.57
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.86Shots per game7.86
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
3.86Shots on target4.57
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
14.5%Shot conversion14.5%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
49%Possession49%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.45xG for1.32
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.54xG against1.4
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Shooting quality

Cacahuatique: Efficient finishingCD Platense: Efficient finishing
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)39%58%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

CD Platense is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 1.4 pts / game - CD Platense

Cacahuatique
DDDLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
14% W57% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
CD Platense
WWLDL
Season result split
29% W43% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-2
1.29 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cacahuatique is 25% better for: goals scored per game.

1.43 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 1.14 goals / game - CD Platense

CD Platense is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.71 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 1.29 goals / game - CD Platense

Cacahuatique scoring profile: very strong

Cacahuatique scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).

10Goals scored (season)8
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
12Goals conceded (season)9
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
3.14Average goals per game2.43
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
4Goals scored (last 5)6
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
43%2 goals43%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
14%3 goals0%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
14%4 goals0%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
57%2 goals29%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
29%3 goals14%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
14%4 goals0%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0%BTTS in both halves14%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
29%Scored in both halves29%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
60%BTTS - last 540%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 1 pts / game - CD Platense

Cacahuatique - half-time state
14% leading71% draw14% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per game (1st half)1
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.43
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.14Average goals (1st half)1
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
71%Clean sheet before half-time43%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
57%No goal before half-time57%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.71
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
1.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
2Average goals (2nd half)1.43
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
43%Clean sheet after half-time57%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense
43%No goal after half-time43%
CacahuatiqueCD Platense

Cacahuatique - second-half results

14% W57% D29% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CD Platense - second-half results

43% W43% D14% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cacahuatique - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
CD Platense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
168%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CacahuatiqueLigaCD Platense
Average goals per game▲ 3.142.59▼ 2.43
Both teams scored▲ 71%49%▲ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 57%44%• 43%
Clean sheets▼ 29%33%▼ 14%
Goal before half-time▼ 43%59%▲ 71%
Goal after half-time• 71%71%• 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / game
1.02
Away goals / game
+53%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defensive advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Cacahuatique's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss against CD Platense. Games average 2.25 goals, and both teams scored in 75% of them.

Cacahuatique
1 : 1
CD Platense
CD Platense
0 : 1
Cacahuatique
Cacahuatique
1 : 3
CD Platense
CD Platense
1 : 1
Cacahuatique

FAQ

What was the result of Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 1:2 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and CD Platense?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 1, CD Platense won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?

Cacahuatique score 1.43 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.14. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Cacahuatique's matches and 57% of CD Platense's.

What form are Cacahuatique and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and CD Platense 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.