Cacahuatique vs CD Platense: match statistics
Cacahuatique vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cacahuatique played against CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Cacahuatique has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. CD Platense has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Cacahuatique scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 1.71. CD Platense scores 1.14 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 71% of Cacahuatique's games and 57% of CD Platense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 43%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cacahuatique has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.32 per game. Cacahuatique takes 9.9 shots per game, while CD Platense takes 7.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. CD Platense leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cacahuatique's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For CD Platense, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cacahuatique have failed to win any of their last five matches, drawing four of them, which significantly increases the likelihood of a stalemate. At home, the hosts average 1.8 goals scored but concede 2.2, while their xG stands at just 1.29 compared with 1.67 allowed to opponents. CD Platense have been more effective recently, scoring 6 goals and winning 2 of their last five matches, but they remain without an away win and have drawn 67% of their matches on the road. The visitors show better defensive organization away from home, conceding an average of 1.0 goals with an against xG of 1.16; however, they create few chances themselves, recording an average xG of 0.77 and just 0.67 goals scored per match. Cacahuatique’s advantage in chance creation and Platense’s poor away attack offset the visitors’ stronger recent form, making a draw the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Cacahuatique have a clear attacking advantage at home: they average 1.73 xG and record 6.75 shots on target per match, while CD Platense manage only 0.77 xG and 1.67 shots on target away from home. The visitors score just 0.67 goals on average, and although their output has improved to 1.2 goals over their last five matches, their scoring potential remains limited. Cacahuatique concede an average of 1.5 goals and have failed to keep a clean sheet in 75% of their matches, but Platense’s weak attack reduces the chances of exploiting this vulnerability. BTTS - Yes has landed in 60% of the hosts’ last five matches, but in only 40% of the visitors’ games, while the league average stands at 49%. The most likely scenario is therefore that the hosts will score, while at least one team—primarily Platense—will fail to find the net, supporting BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Cacahuatique creates significantly more chances, averaging 11.75 shots and 6.75 shots on target, compared with Platense’s 2.67 shots and 1.67 shots on target per match. The hosts have an average xG of 1.73, while the visitors’ attack produces just 0.77 xG, limiting the projection for Platense to around 0.88 goals. On a season-long basis, 75% of Cacahuatique’s matches and all of Platense’s away matches finished with fewer than 3.5 goals, while neither team has recorded a match with more than 4.5 goals. The last five matches provide more open xG signals, at 1.46 and 1.45 respectively, but Cacahuatique’s actual return was just 4 goals over that period. The projected total of 2.33 goals gives the strongest edge to Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and at full-time, as Cacahuatique were level at the break in 3 of their 4 home matches, while CD Platense recorded a half-time draw in 60% of their last five games. The hosts’ recent form clearly limits their advantage: they have failed to win any of their previous five matches, drawing 80% of them, whereas the visitors recorded 2 wins over the same period. The first halves should be cautious, as the hosts averaged just 0.2 goals scored in their last five matches, while both teams conceded 0.4 goals per game. However, Cacahuatique have stronger full-season home figures, averaging 1.50 goals scored and an xG of 1.73, compared with Platense’s 0.67 goals and 0.77 xG away from home, reducing the likelihood of an away win. A full-time draw is also supported by Platense’s profile, as they have drawn 67% of their away matches this season.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cacahuatique | CD Platense | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 58% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
CD Platense is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 1.4 pts / game - CD Platense
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cacahuatique is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1.43 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 1.14 goals / game - CD Platense
CD Platense is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.71 goals / game - Cacahuatique · 1.29 goals / game - CD Platense
Cacahuatique scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).
CD Platense scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
Over / Under - CD Platense
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cacahuatique is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Cacahuatique · 1 pts / game - CD Platense
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
CD Platense - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cacahuatique
CD Platense
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Cacahuatique | Liga | CD Platense | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.14 | 2.59 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 49% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 44% | • 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 59% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | • 71% | 71% | • 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cacahuatique's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss against CD Platense. Games average 2.25 goals, and both teams scored in 75% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 1:2 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and CD Platense?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 1, CD Platense won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?
Cacahuatique score 1.43 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.14. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Cacahuatique's matches and 57% of CD Platense's.
What form are Cacahuatique and CD Platense in?
Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and CD Platense 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs CD Platense?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


