Cádiz vs FC Andorra: match statistics
Cádiz vs FC Andorra: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cádiz played against FC Andorra in Segunda División (Spain). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Cádiz has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. FC Andorra has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Cádiz scores 0.97 goals per game and allows 1.38. FC Andorra scores 1.47 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Cádiz's games and 68% of FC Andorra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 56%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FC Andorra has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.15 per game. Cádiz takes 10.1 shots per game, while FC Andorra takes 14.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Cádiz leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. FC Andorra leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.85 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cádiz's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). For FC Andorra, it is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Segunda División games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Andorra is the favorite in this fixture: they sit 11th versus 18th Cádiz, and the visitors have scored 50 goals this season compared to the hosts' 33. The difference over the last five matches is clear — Andorra have scored 14 goals and average 1.6 points per game in that period, while Cádiz have only 4 goals and 0.6 points per game. Chance quality also favors Andorra: on average 4.94 shots on target and 13.24 attempts per game with an 11% conversion rate, versus 3.59 on target and 12.18 attempts for Cádiz (8% conversion), and the visitors’ xG is 1.46 compared to the hosts’ 1.38. The home side has some advantage in clean sheets at home (35% vs Andorra’s 12% away), but their home record is weak (goal difference -7 and 53% losses), and they have conceded 11 goals in the last 5 matches versus 7 for Andorra. Considering the superior efficiency, higher possession (57% vs 50%) and the visitors’ form, I predict an FC Andorra victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have high season BTTS rates: Cádiz 71% and FC Andorra 65%, both above the league average of 55%, indicating a strong tendency for matches with goals at both ends. In the last 5 fixtures Andorra scored 14 goals (2.8 per game), whereas Cádiz has only 4 goals (0.8) and conceded on average 2.2 goals, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Season xG are 1.74 for Cádiz and 1.46 for Andorra, with xG against 1.08 for Cádiz and 1.6 for Andorra; additionally, average on-target shots are 5.06 (Cádiz) and 4.94 (Andorra), showing both teams create chances and can convert them into goals. Clean sheets are rare: Cádiz 24% and Andorra 12%, and over 2.5 rate is 53% for Cádiz and 59% for Andorra, further supporting the BTTS scenario. As a result I consider the "yes" scenario stronger and, pricing the risk, assign 72% to BTTS=yes and 28% to BTTS=no.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects a total of 2.94 goals: Cádiz ~1.67 (xG_for 1.74 vs opponent xG_against 1.60) and FC Andorra ~1.27 (xG_for 1.46 vs opponent xG_against 1.08). Seasonal >1.5 percentages are high: Cádiz 71% and Andorra 88%, and both teams have BTTS rates of 71% and 65% respectively, which strongly supports a scenario of at least two goals — hence over 1.5 at 88%. For the 2.5 line the signal is mixed: seasonally Cádiz 53% and Andorra 59% of matches exceed 2.5, and in the last 5 matches the figures are 80% (Cádiz) and 60% (Andorra), yielding a moderate edge for Over 2.5 (~62%). Over 3.5 is unlikely given seasonal rates of 24% (Cádiz) and 35% (Andorra), so I estimate only ~30% probability of over 3.5 goals. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: over, line 1.5) — combined xG 2.94, high >1.5 percentages (71% vs 88%) and frequent BTTS increase the likelihood of at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to FC Andorra leading at half-time and the match finishing as a draw: Andorra scored 5 goals in minutes 0–15 compared to just 1 by Cádiz, and half-time leads are 29% for Andorra versus 18% for the home side. Cádiz, however, is very active late in matches — the hosts have scored 9 goals in minutes 76–90, while Andorra conceded 9 in the same phase, which increases the chance of a turnaround after the break. The form differential confirms this picture: Cádiz’s last five results read WLLLL with an average points per game of 0.6, while Andorra’s read D L W D W with an average of 1.6, so the visitors more frequently take leads and collect points over the short term. Additionally, Cádiz generates more opportunities (xG 1.74 versus Andorra’s 1.46), meaning they have the capacity to force an equalizer; therefore the HT/FT scenario of Andorra leading at half-time and the match finishing level is the most substantiated.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cádiz | FC Andorra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FC Andorra is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Cádiz · 1.6 pts / game - FC Andorra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Andorra is 52% better for: goals scored per game.
0.97 goals / game - Cádiz · 1.47 goals / game - FC Andorra
Cádiz scores in 65% of games (22 of 34 meczów), while FC Andorra keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 meczów).
FC Andorra scores in 79% of games (27 of 34 meczów), while Cádiz keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cádiz
Over / Under - FC Andorra
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FC Andorra is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / game - Cádiz · 1.21 pts / game - FC Andorra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cádiz - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FC Andorra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cádiz
FC Andorra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| Cádiz | Liga | FC Andorra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.35 | 2.59 | ▲ 2.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 55% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 49% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 69% | • 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 74% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Cádiz's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against FC Andorra. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cádiz vs FC Andorra?
The Segunda División match finished Cádiz 0:1 FC Andorra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cádiz vs FC Andorra?
Cádiz score 0.97 goals per game on average and FC Andorra 1.47. The Segunda División average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Cádiz's matches and 68% of FC Andorra's.
What form are Cádiz and FC Andorra in?
Over the last 5 games Cádiz have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and FC Andorra 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cádiz vs FC Andorra?
The statistical background for Cádiz vs FC Andorra — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


