Cagliari vs Como: match statistics
Como displays significantly better form and statistics this season, sitting in 5th place in the table with an impressive record of 13 victories. The visiting team has a clear advantage in away matches – 46% win rate, averaging 1.54 goals per match and a positive goal difference of +10. Cagliari is in 13th position, with very poor home form (only 31% wins) and a balanced goal difference of 0 in home matches. Como also dominates possession (59% vs 47%) and records higher xG values (1.39 vs 1.08), which testifies to the better quality of chances created. The last five matches confirm the visitors' advantage – Como earned 1.6 points per game compared to just 1.0 point for Cagliari. Considering all statistics, Como has a real chance of winning, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the solidity of both teams in this aspect.
Cagliari vs Como: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cagliari played against Como in Serie A (Italy). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Cagliari has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Como has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Cagliari scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 1.33. Como scores 1.63 and allows 0.74. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Cagliari's games and 41% of Como's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 41%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Como has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.08 per game. Cagliari takes 10.0 shots per game, while Como takes 14.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Cagliari leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Como leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.93 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cagliari's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Como, it is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie A games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Como displays significantly better form and statistics this season, sitting in 5th place in the table with an impressive record of 13 victories. The visiting team has a clear advantage in away matches – 46% win rate, averaging 1.54 goals per match and a positive goal difference of +10. Cagliari is in 13th position, with very poor home form (only 31% wins) and a balanced goal difference of 0 in home matches. Como also dominates possession (59% vs 47%) and records higher xG values (1.39 vs 1.08), which testifies to the better quality of chances created. The last five matches confirm the visitors' advantage – Como earned 1.6 points per game compared to just 1.0 point for Cagliari. Considering all statistics, Como has a real chance of winning, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the solidity of both teams in this aspect.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cagliari | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Como is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Cagliari · 1.6 pts / game - Como
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Como is 52% better for: goals scored per game.
1.07 goals / game - Cagliari · 1.63 goals / game - Como
Como is 80% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Cagliari · 0.74 goals / game - Como
Cagliari scores in 63% of games (17 of 27 meczów), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 meczów).
Como scores in 74% of games (20 of 27 meczów), while Cagliari keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cagliari
Over / Under - Como
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Como is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / game - Cagliari · 1.7 pts / game - Como
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cagliari - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Como - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cagliari
Como
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Cagliari | Liga | Como | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.41 | 2.43 | • 2.37 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 32% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 77% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cagliari's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Como. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cagliari vs Como?
The Serie A match finished Cagliari 1:2 Como. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cagliari vs Como?
Cagliari score 1.07 goals per game on average and Como 1.63. The Serie A average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Cagliari's matches and 41% of Como's.
What form are Cagliari and Como in?
Over the last 5 games Cagliari have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Como 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cagliari vs Como?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.