Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Calvary vs Kitara: match statistics

Calvary crest
Calvary
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Kitara crest
Kitara
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Kitara is the clear favorite in this match. The hosts, Calvary, occupy the last 16th place in the table, have not won a single match this season, and have scored only 6 goals while conceding 24. Their home form is dismal – 0% wins, 67% of matches without a goal scored, and a five-match winless streak. On the other hand, Kitara sits in 4th place with a record of 9 wins, displaying excellent form – 4 wins in their last 5 matches and an average of 2.4 points per game. The visitors have better xG statistics (2.09 vs 1.91), shooting accuracy (8% vs 0%), and a 50% away win rate. The class difference between the two teams is clear, which points to a certain victory for Kitara.

Calvary vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Calvary play Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 31 January 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Calvary: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Calvary scores 0.48 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Calvary 21%, Kitara 38%. Over 2.5: Calvary 17%, Kitara 31%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.18. Calvary: 3.6 shots per match, Kitara: 11.3.

Match halves

Calvary: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.21. Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Calvary: 0-15 (5 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kitara is the clear favorite in this match. The hosts, Calvary, occupy the last 16th place in the table, have not won a single match this season, and have scored only 6 goals while conceding 24. Their home form is dismal – 0% wins, 67% of matches without a goal scored, and a five-match winless streak. On the other hand, Kitara sits in 4th place with a record of 9 wins, displaying excellent form – 4 wins in their last 5 matches and an average of 2.4 points per game. The visitors have better xG statistics (2.09 vs 1.91), shooting accuracy (8% vs 0%), and a 50% away win rate. The class difference between the two teams is clear, which points to a certain victory for Kitara.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
CalvaryKitara
-1Shots-1
CalvaryKitara
-1Shots on target-1
CalvaryKitara
0xG0
CalvaryKitara
-1Corners-1
CalvaryKitara
0Dangerous attacks0
CalvaryKitara
-1Fouls-1
CalvaryKitara
-1Cards-1
CalvaryKitara

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.48Goals scored / match1.38
CalvaryKitara
1.24Goals conceded / match0.72
CalvaryKitara
20%Average possession46%
CalvaryKitara
0.79Shots on target / match4.69
CalvaryKitara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.62Shots per match11.31
CalvaryKitara
0.79Shots on target4.69
CalvaryKitara
13.3%Shot conversion12.2%
CalvaryKitara
20%Possession46%
CalvaryKitara
1.18xG for1.65
CalvaryKitara
1.86xG against1.31
CalvaryKitara

Shooting quality

Calvary: Counter-attackingKitara: Counter-attacking
CalvaryKitara
Accuracy (shots on target)22%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.330.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.610.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Calvary is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Calvary · 1 pts / match - Kitara

Calvary
LWDDW
Season result split
14% W31% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-16
0.72 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-5
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 188% better for: goals scored per match.

0.48 goals / match - Calvary · 1.38 goals / match - Kitara

Kitara is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Calvary · 0.72 goals / match - Kitara

Calvary scoring profile: more difficult

Calvary scores in 34% of matches (10 of 29 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

Kitara scoring profile: strong

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Calvary keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).

14Goals scored (season)40
CalvaryKitara
36Goals conceded (season)21
CalvaryKitara
1.72Average goals in match2.1
CalvaryKitara
4Goals scored (last 5)7
CalvaryKitara
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
CalvaryKitara

How often they score at least...

34%1 goal76%
CalvaryKitara
14%2 goals41%
CalvaryKitara
0%3 goals14%
CalvaryKitara
0%4 goals7%
CalvaryKitara

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal55%
CalvaryKitara
28%2 goals14%
CalvaryKitara
17%3 goals3%
CalvaryKitara
14%4 goals0%
CalvaryKitara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time10%
CalvaryKitara
0%BTTS in both halves3%
CalvaryKitara
3%Scored in both halves21%
CalvaryKitara

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
CalvaryKitara
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
CalvaryKitara
20%BTTS - last 560%
CalvaryKitara

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

48%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
CalvaryKitara
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
CalvaryKitara
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
CalvaryKitara

2nd half

41%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
CalvaryKitara
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
CalvaryKitara
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
CalvaryKitara

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 154% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.76 pts / match - Calvary · 1.93 pts / match - Kitara

Calvary - half-time state
7% leading55% draw38% trailing
Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.76Points per match (1st half)1.93
CalvaryKitara
0.21Goals scored (1st half)0.9
CalvaryKitara
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.34
CalvaryKitara
0.86Average goals (1st half)1.24
CalvaryKitara
59%Clean sheet before half-time76%
CalvaryKitara
83%No goal before half-time38%
CalvaryKitara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.21
CalvaryKitara
0.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
CalvaryKitara
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
CalvaryKitara
0.66Average goals (2nd half)0.86
CalvaryKitara
69%Clean sheet after half-time62%
CalvaryKitara
83%No goal after half-time66%
CalvaryKitara

Calvary - second-half results

14% W62% R24% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Calvary - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.00.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Calvary
ScoredConceded
5
10
0-15
0
8
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.91
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
26%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Calvary

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
166%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

CalvaryLigaKitara
Average goals in match 1.722.09 2.10
Both teams scored 21%38% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%35% 31%
Clean sheets 38%39% 45%
Goal before half-time 48%59% 76%
Goal after half-time 41%62% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Calvary 0 - 1 - 0 Kitara. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Calvary vs Kitara?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Calvary 0:1 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Calvary vs Kitara?

Calvary score 0.48 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.38. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 21% of Calvary's matches and 38% of Kitara's.

What form are Calvary and Kitara in?

Over the last 5 games Calvary have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kitara 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Calvary vs Kitara?

The statistical background for Calvary vs Kitara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.