Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Calvary vs URA: match statistics

Calvary crest
Calvary
0 : 0half-time 0:0
URA crest
URA
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

The match shapes up to be a clash between two teams in very poor form. Calvary, in 16th place, has not won a single match this season, scoring just 6 goals while conceding 24, and their form in the last 5 matches is only 0.4 points per game. URA, in 12th place, presents an equally dramatic disposition with a streak of 5 consecutive defeats and no goals scored in the last 5 encounters. In away matches, URA has an 83% failure to score rate and averages only 0.17 goals per match. Considering that both teams struggle to score (Calvary 60% FTS% at home, URA 83% FTS% away) and the poor form of both sides, a low-scoring draw seems most likely. Calvary has 40% draws at home, and URA 50% draws away, which further supports this prediction.

Calvary vs URA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Calvary play URA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 27 January 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Calvary: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. URA: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Calvary scores 0.48 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. URA scores 0.90 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Calvary 21%, URA 40%. Over 2.5: Calvary 17%, URA 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

URA has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.18. Calvary: 3.6 shots per match, URA: 11.0.

Match halves

Calvary: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.21. URA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Calvary: 0-15 (5 goals). URA: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The match shapes up to be a clash between two teams in very poor form. Calvary, in 16th place, has not won a single match this season, scoring just 6 goals while conceding 24, and their form in the last 5 matches is only 0.4 points per game. URA, in 12th place, presents an equally dramatic disposition with a streak of 5 consecutive defeats and no goals scored in the last 5 encounters. In away matches, URA has an 83% failure to score rate and averages only 0.17 goals per match. Considering that both teams struggle to score (Calvary 60% FTS% at home, URA 83% FTS% away) and the poor form of both sides, a low-scoring draw seems most likely. Calvary has 40% draws at home, and URA 50% draws away, which further supports this prediction.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
CalvaryURA
16Shots12
CalvaryURA
4Shots on target3
CalvaryURA
1.91xG1.66
CalvaryURA
4Corners6
CalvaryURA
83Dangerous attacks93
CalvaryURA
-1Fouls-1
CalvaryURA
-1Cards-1
CalvaryURA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.48Goals scored / match0.9
CalvaryURA
1.24Goals conceded / match0.97
CalvaryURA
20%Average possession51%
CalvaryURA
0.79Shots on target / match4.37
CalvaryURA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.62Shots per match11
CalvaryURA
0.79Shots on target4.37
CalvaryURA
13.3%Shot conversion8.2%
CalvaryURA
20%Possession51%
CalvaryURA
1.18xG for1.56
CalvaryURA
1.86xG against1.38
CalvaryURA

Shooting quality

Calvary: Counter-attackingURA: Balanced
CalvaryURA
Accuracy (shots on target)22%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.330.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.610.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Calvary is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Calvary · 1.4 pts / match - URA

Calvary
LWDDW
Season result split
14% W31% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-16
0.72 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-5
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
URA
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W53% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-16-9
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-8-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

URA is 88% better for: goals scored per match.

0.48 goals / match - Calvary · 0.9 goals / match - URA

URA is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Calvary · 0.97 goals / match - URA

Calvary scoring profile: more difficult

Calvary scores in 34% of matches (10 of 29 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

URA scoring profile: mixed

URA scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Calvary keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).

14Goals scored (season)27
CalvaryURA
36Goals conceded (season)29
CalvaryURA
1.72Average goals in match1.87
CalvaryURA
4Goals scored (last 5)7
CalvaryURA
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
CalvaryURA

How often they score at least...

34%1 goal50%
CalvaryURA
14%2 goals17%
CalvaryURA
0%3 goals10%
CalvaryURA
0%4 goals3%
CalvaryURA

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal60%
CalvaryURA
28%2 goals27%
CalvaryURA
17%3 goals10%
CalvaryURA
14%4 goals0%
CalvaryURA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time17%
CalvaryURA
0%BTTS in both halves7%
CalvaryURA
3%Scored in both halves13%
CalvaryURA

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
CalvaryURA
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
CalvaryURA
20%BTTS - last 560%
CalvaryURA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

48%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
CalvaryURA
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
CalvaryURA
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
CalvaryURA

2nd half

41%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
CalvaryURA
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
CalvaryURA
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
CalvaryURA

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

URA is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.76 pts / match - Calvary · 1.17 pts / match - URA

Calvary - half-time state
7% leading55% draw38% trailing
URA - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.76Points per match (1st half)1.17
CalvaryURA
0.21Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CalvaryURA
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
CalvaryURA
0.86Average goals (1st half)0.93
CalvaryURA
59%Clean sheet before half-time60%
CalvaryURA
83%No goal before half-time67%
CalvaryURA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.17
CalvaryURA
0.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
CalvaryURA
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
CalvaryURA
0.66Average goals (2nd half)0.93
CalvaryURA
69%Clean sheet after half-time60%
CalvaryURA
83%No goal after half-time70%
CalvaryURA

Calvary - second-half results

14% W62% R24% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

URA - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Calvary - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.00.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Calvary
ScoredConceded
5
10
0-15
0
8
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
33%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Calvary

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

CalvaryLigaURA
Average goals in match 1.722.09 1.87
Both teams scored 21%38% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%35% 27%
Clean sheets 38%39% 40%
Goal before half-time 48%59% 57%
Goal after half-time 41%62% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Calvary 0 - 1 - 0 URA. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Calvary vs URA?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Calvary 0:0 URA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Calvary vs URA?

Calvary score 0.48 goals per game on average and URA 0.90. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 21% of Calvary's matches and 40% of URA's.

What form are Calvary and URA in?

Over the last 5 games Calvary have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and URA 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Calvary vs URA?

The statistical background for Calvary vs URA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.