Cambodia - Cambodian LeagueData current as of September 13, 2026

Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket: match statistics

Cambodia Tiger crest
Cambodia Tiger
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Boeung Ket crest
Boeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cambodia Tiger played against Boeung Ket in Cambodian League (Cambodia). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Cambodia Tiger has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Boeung Ket has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Cambodia Tiger scores 2.27 goals per game and allows 1.38. Boeung Ket scores 1.35 and allows 0.85. Games in this league average 3.16 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of Cambodia Tiger's games and 35% of Boeung Ket's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 38%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cambodia Tiger has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.46 per game. Cambodia Tiger takes 14.7 shots per game, while Boeung Ket takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Cambodia Tiger leads at halftime in 54% of its games and scores 1.19 goals per game after halftime. Boeung Ket leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.85 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cambodia Tiger's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Boeung Ket, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Cambodian League games average 3.16 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1) due to Cambodia Tiger’s clear offensive superiority at home: Cambodia Tiger averages 2.58 goals per home match with xG 2.12, while Boeung Ket averages 1.54 goals away with xG 1.56. Additionally, the hosts create substantially more chances — 17.92 shots and 5.92 on target per home game versus 12.23 shots and 4.62 on target for the visitors — and conversion rates are 14% vs 13%, enhancing the hosts’ offensive efficiency. On form, Boeung Ket are stronger in the last five matches — 3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 points per game and 8 goals in the last 5 — whereas the hosts in their last 5 have 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per game with 7 scored. Defensively the seasonal difference is marginal: the hosts concede 1.17 goals at home on average versus Boeung Ket’s 1.23 conceded away, but in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded only 4 goals compared to the hosts’ 7. Overall, the advantage in quality of chances and higher home efficiency (xG 2.12 vs 1.56, 17.92 vs 12.23 shots) gives Cambodia Tiger a higher probability of victory, therefore I propose the distribution: 55% home, 25% draw, 20% away.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In my assessment the more likely scenario is 'No' (BTTS - No), because the home side have a very high clean sheet rate this season: 54% of matches without conceding and only 0.46 goals conceded per game on average. Season-long BTTS rates for both teams are low: 38% for Cambodia Tiger and 31% for Boeung Ket, which contrasts with the league average of 56% and suggests these teams less frequently allow both sides to score. However, short-term signals point the other way — in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of games, and the home team conceded 1.4 goals on average in those five matches (compared to the seasonal 0.46). The visitors also have superior offensive metrics: 1.54 goals scored this season, 4.62 shots on target per game and xG 1.56, which increases their chance of scoring. Considering the strong seasonal defensive signal from the home team (54% clean sheets) and mixed but short-term offensive indications from the visitors, I forecast 'No' at 60% probability and 'Yes' at 40% as the most justified prediction.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate expected goals at 1.59 for the home team and 1.44 for the away team (total 3.03). These values are derived by averaging seasonal and last-5-match approaches: seasonal xG of the home attack 1.36 and xG conceded by the away side 1.64 yield 1.50, while the last 5 matches give 1.69 and 1.65 respectively (average 1.67), hence the mean 1.59; similarly for the away team seasonal attacking xG 1.56 and xG conceded to the home team 1.36 give 1.46, and the last 5 matches 1.66 and 1.18 give 1.42, averaging to 1.44. Seasonal figures confirm offensive potential: the home side scores 1.15 goals per game, the away side 1.54; in the last 5 matches 1.4 and 1.6 respectively (sum 3.0) and the league goals average of 3.16 indicate a tendency toward 2–3 goal matches. Seasonal over percentages show the home team had over 1.5 in 54% of matches and the away team in 77% (average 65%), therefore I assign a high probability to Over 1.5 (72%). I assess Over 2.5 at 60% (seasonal 23%/54%, last 5 matches 40%/60%), while Over 3.5 remains low (28%) because seasonal values are 8%/31% (average 19.5%); the best market to play is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal concerns the Half-Time result: hosts draw at the break in 62% of their matches, while visitors record a half-time draw in only 31%, which strongly favors a draw at 45 minutes. Over the full match the advantage appears to lie with the visitors: the visitors’ average goals scored is 1.54 per game with xG 1.56, versus the hosts’ 1.15 goals and xG 1.36, so the visitors both create and convert more chances. It is particularly important that the visitors average 1.00 goal in the second half and 100% of their matches have featured at least one goal after the break, whereas the hosts average 0.69 and only 62% of their matches have had a goal after the break, which increases the likelihood that the visitors will turn the game around after half-time. Additionally, in the last five meetings the visitors have won 60% of cases versus 40% for the hosts, therefore the most probable HT/FT scenario is a Half-Time draw with a Full-Time win for the visitors (X/2), although the hosts’ low average goals before the break of 0.46 and 92% of clean sheets for hosts at half-time also leave some chance of a full-time draw.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

42Possession (%)58
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
12Shots12
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
4Shots on target3
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.43xG1.42
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
7Corners8
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
55Dangerous attacks63
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
10Fouls2
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
0Cards0
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
2.27Goals scored / game1.35
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.38Goals allowed / game0.85
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
45%Average possession48%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
4.96Shots on target / game4.08
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.65Shots per game11.62
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
4.96Shots on target4.08
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
15.5%Shot conversion11.6%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
45%Possession48%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.78xG for1.46
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.36xG against1.5
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Shooting quality

Cambodia Tiger: Counter-attackingBoeung Ket: Balanced
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Boeung Ket is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Cambodia Tiger · 1.8 pts / game - Boeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger
DLWWL
Season result split
50% W19% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-8
1.69 pts / game · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Boeung Ket
DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
46% W31% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cambodia Tiger is 68% better for: goals scored per game.

2.27 goals / game - Cambodia Tiger · 1.35 goals / game - Boeung Ket

Boeung Ket is 62% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.38 goals / game - Cambodia Tiger · 0.85 goals / game - Boeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger scoring profile: strong

Cambodia Tiger scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 meczów), while Boeung Ket keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 meczów).

Boeung Ket scoring profile: strong

Boeung Ket scores in 65% of games (17 of 26 meczów), while Cambodia Tiger keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 meczów).

59Goals scored (season)35
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
36Goals conceded (season)22
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
3.65Average goals per game2.19
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal65%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
54%2 goals42%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
46%3 goals15%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
19%4 goals4%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal58%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
42%2 goals19%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
23%3 goals8%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
0%4 goals0%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time0%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
15%BTTS in both halves0%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
54%Scored in both halves27%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
60%BTTS - last 580%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cambodia Tiger is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / game - Cambodia Tiger · 1.62 pts / game - Boeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger - half-time state
54% leading23% draw23% trailing
Boeung Ket - half-time state
38% leading46% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per game (1st half)1.62
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.08Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.19
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.65Average goals (1st half)0.69
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
54%Clean sheet before half-time85%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
35%No goal before half-time62%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.38
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.19Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
2Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
42%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
38%No goal after half-time46%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger - second-half results

38% W35% D27% L
48
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding93%

Leads at halftime in 54% of games and wins 50%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Boeung Ket - second-half results

35% W35% D31% L
42
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cambodia Tiger - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Boeung Ket - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.00
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cambodia Tiger
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
9
7
16-30
11
5
31-45
12
5
46-60
7
6
61-75
12
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Boeung Ket
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
1
16-30
7
0
31-45
8
4
46-60
6
5
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cambodia Tiger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Boeung Ket

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Cambodian League).

Teams vs league

Cambodia TigerLigaBoeung Ket
Average goals per game 3.653.16 2.19
Both teams scored 54%57% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%59% 38%
Clean sheets 27%25% 42%
Goal before half-time 85%71% 54%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / game
1.67
Away goals / game
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-13%
Home defensive advantage
+-5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cambodia TigerGoalMakara Tum
  2. Cambodia TigerGoalGuytho Mijland

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Cambodia Tiger's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Boeung Ket. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?

The Cambodian League match finished Cambodia Tiger 2:0 Boeung Ket. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cambodia Tiger and Boeung Ket?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cambodia Tiger won 2, Boeung Ket won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?

Cambodia Tiger score 2.27 goals per game on average and Boeung Ket 1.35. The Cambodian League average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Cambodia Tiger's matches and 35% of Boeung Ket's.

What form are Cambodia Tiger and Boeung Ket in?

Over the last 5 games Cambodia Tiger have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Boeung Ket 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.