Cambodia - Cambodian LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket: match statistics

Cambodia Tiger crest
Cambodia Tiger
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Boeung Ket crest
Boeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cambodia Tiger play Boeung Ket in Cambodian League (Cambodia). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Cambodia Tiger: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Boeung Ket: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cambodia Tiger scores 2.37 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Boeung Ket scores 1.47 and concedes 0.97. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cambodia Tiger 57%, Boeung Ket 37%. Over 2.5: Cambodia Tiger 70%, Boeung Ket 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Cambodia Tiger has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.47. Cambodia Tiger: 14.7 shots per match, Boeung Ket: 11.8.

Match halves

Cambodia Tiger: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 1.20. Boeung Ket: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Cambodia Tiger: 76-90+ (15 goals). Boeung Ket: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Cambodian League: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I back the home win (1) due to Cambodia Tiger’s clear offensive superiority at home: Cambodia Tiger averages 2.58 goals per home match with xG 2.12, while Boeung Ket averages 1.54 goals away with xG 1.56. Additionally, the hosts create substantially more chances — 17.92 shots and 5.92 on target per home game versus 12.23 shots and 4.62 on target for the visitors — and conversion rates are 14% vs 13%, enhancing the hosts’ offensive efficiency. On form, Boeung Ket are stronger in the last five matches — 3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 points per game and 8 goals in the last 5 — whereas the hosts in their last 5 have 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per game with 7 scored. Defensively the seasonal difference is marginal: the hosts concede 1.17 goals at home on average versus Boeung Ket’s 1.23 conceded away, but in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded only 4 goals compared to the hosts’ 7. Overall, the advantage in quality of chances and higher home efficiency (xG 2.12 vs 1.56, 17.92 vs 12.23 shots) gives Cambodia Tiger a higher probability of victory, therefore I propose the distribution: 55% home, 25% draw, 20% away.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
12Shots12
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
4Shots on target3
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.43xG1.42
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
7Corners8
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
55Dangerous attacks63
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
10Fouls2
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
0Cards0
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
2.37Goals scored / match1.47
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.37Goals conceded / match0.97
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
44%Average possession47%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
5.1Shots on target / match4.2
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.67Shots per match11.8
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
5.1Shots on target4.2
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
16.1%Shot conversion12.4%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
44%Possession47%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.76xG for1.47
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.39xG against1.49
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Shooting quality

Cambodia Tiger: Counter-attackingBoeung Ket: Counter-attacking
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cambodia Tiger
LWWWW
Season result split
57% W17% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-5-8
1.87 pts / match · goal difference +30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-3-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Boeung Ket
WLWWW
Season result split
50% W27% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-7
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-6
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cambodia Tiger is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

2.37 goals / match - Cambodia Tiger · 1.47 goals / match - Boeung Ket

Boeung Ket is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.37 goals / match - Cambodia Tiger · 0.97 goals / match - Boeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger scoring profile: strong

Cambodia Tiger scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Boeung Ket keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

Boeung Ket scoring profile: strong

Boeung Ket scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Cambodia Tiger keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

71Goals scored (season)44
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
41Goals conceded (season)29
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
3.73Average goals in match2.43
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
12Goals scored (last 5)12
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal67%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
60%2 goals47%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
47%3 goals20%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
23%4 goals7%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal60%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
40%2 goals27%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
23%3 goals10%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
0%4 goals0%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time3%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
57%Scored in both halves27%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
60%BTTS - last 560%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cambodia Tiger is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.87 pts / match - Cambodia Tiger · 1.67 pts / match - Boeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger - half-time state
53% leading27% draw20% trailing
Boeung Ket - half-time state
40% leading47% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.87Points per match (1st half)1.67
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.17Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.23
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.7Average goals (1st half)0.87
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
57%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
33%No goal before half-time60%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
2.03Average goals (2nd half)1.57
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
43%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket
33%No goal after half-time47%
Cambodia TigerBoeung Ket

Cambodia Tiger - second-half results

40% W33% R27% P
56
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Boeung Ket - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
50
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cambodia Tiger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Boeung Ket - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cambodia Tiger
ScoredConceded
9
4
0-15
12
7
16-30
14
5
31-45
14
5
46-60
7
7
61-75
15
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Boeung Ket
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
10
1
31-45
8
5
46-60
6
5
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cambodia Tiger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Boeung Ket

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Cambodian League).

Teams vs league

Cambodia TigerLigaBoeung Ket
Average goals in match 3.733.19 2.43
Both teams scored 57%56% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%60% 40%
Clean sheets 27%25% 40%
Goal before half-time 83%71% 53%
Goal after half-time 87%83% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / match
1.63
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cambodia Tiger 2 - 1 - 0 Boeung Ket. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?

The Cambodian League match finished Cambodia Tiger 2:0 Boeung Ket. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cambodia Tiger and Boeung Ket?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cambodia Tiger won 2, Boeung Ket won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?

Cambodia Tiger score 2.37 goals per game on average and Boeung Ket 1.47. The Cambodian League average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Cambodia Tiger's matches and 37% of Boeung Ket's.

What form are Cambodia Tiger and Boeung Ket in?

Over the last 5 games Cambodia Tiger have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Boeung Ket 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.