Cambridge United vs Barrow: match statistics
Cambridge United vs Barrow: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cambridge United played against Barrow in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Cambridge United has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Barrow has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Cambridge United scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 0.75. Barrow scores 1.00 and allows 1.66. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Cambridge United's games and 57% of Barrow's. The Over 2.5 rates are 34% and 61%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cambridge United has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.21 per game. Cambridge United takes 11.6 shots per game, while Barrow takes 10.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Cambridge United leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Barrow leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cambridge United's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (15 goals). For Barrow, it is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cambridge United holds a clear statistical edge: they are 4th in the table and win 64% of home matches, while Barrow sit 23rd and win only 18% of away games. In attack the hosts score an average of 1.82 goals per home match (7 goals in the last 5), have an average xG of 1.56, 13 shots and 4.55 on target per game and a conversion rate of 14%, whereas Barrow score 1.23 goals away (6 in the last 5), have xG 1.23, 10.77 shots and 3.59 on target and a 11% conversion. Defensively the gap is even wider: Cambridge concede 0.68 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 41% of games, while Barrow concede 1.86 goals away with only 14% clean sheets; in the last 5 matches Barrow conceded 9 goals versus 4 conceded by Cambridge. Considering the advantage in quality of chances (xG 1.56 vs 1.23), finishing (conversion 14% vs 11%) and defense (0.68 vs 1.86), I give Cambridge a 72% chance to win, 18% for a draw and 10% for a Barrow win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'Both Teams To Score' scenario looks more likely as Barrow has a seasonal BTTS rate of 73% versus Cambridge's 41%, with the league average at 53% — a strong signal favoring the away side. Barrow concedes on average 1.86 goals per game with xG against 1.82, while Cambridge scores an average of 0.77 goals at home with xG 1.19, meaning Cambridge generates more expected chances than their actual goals (1.19 vs 0.77). In the last 5 matches both teams register BTTS at 60% and Cambridge averages 1.4 goals scored and concedes 0.8 in that period, whereas Barrow concedes 1.8 on average, which further supports an expectation of goals at both ends. Clean sheets are uncommon: Cambridge have 18% matches without conceding, Barrow only 14%, and as much as 73% of Barrow’s matches combined over 2.5 goals and BTTS, therefore a 'BTTS - Yes' tip is more strongly justified; I estimate the probability of BTTS at about 68% versus 32% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect 1.50 goals for Cambridge (attacking xG 1.19 vs Barrow defensive xG 1.82 → avg 1.50) and 1.32 for Barrow (attacking xG 1.23 vs Cambridge defensive xG 1.41 → 1.32), yielding a total expected sum of 2.82 goals. Season metrics confirm a tendency for goals: Over 1.5 occurs in 59% of Cambridge’s matches and 82% of Barrow’s matches, and both teams have 91% of games with at least one goal (Over 0.5). Additionally, Barrow averages 3.59 on-target shots with an 11% conversion and concedes 1.86 goals away, while Cambridge averages 2.68 on-target shots and has scored 1.4 goals on average in the last 5 matches (7 in the last 5), which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. A Poisson model for total xG=2.82 gives about a 53% chance of 3+ goals, hence I assess Over 2.5 at ~56% and Over 3.5 at ~32%. Consequently, the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (rating 78%), so I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the best line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and an away win (X/2), because Cambridge were level at the break in 55% of matches, strongly favoring a Half-Time X. Barrow average 1.23 goals per match versus Cambridge's 0.77 and record 0.73 goals before the interval compared to just 0.18 for the hosts, so the visitors have greater potential to swing the result after the break. The second half often produces goals (over 0.5 goals in the second half in 82% of Cambridge matches and 77% of Barrow matches), and Barrow have a seasonal 73% of games with both teams scoring, which supports a decisive goal after the break. xG values are similar (1.19 for Cambridge vs 1.23 for Barrow), but Barrow’s seasonal advantage in average goals scored (1.23 vs 0.77) justifies assigning X/2 the highest probability (25%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cambridge United | Barrow | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cambridge United is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Cambridge United · 0.8 pts / game - Barrow
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cambridge United is 43% better for: goals scored per game.
1.43 goals / game - Cambridge United · 1 goals / game - Barrow
Cambridge United is 121% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.75 goals / game - Cambridge United · 1.66 goals / game - Barrow
Cambridge United scores in 77% of games (34 of 44 meczów), while Barrow keeps a clean sheet in 16% (7 of 44 meczów).
Barrow scores in 64% of games (28 of 44 meczów), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 41% (18 of 44 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cambridge United
Over / Under - Barrow
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cambridge United is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / game - Cambridge United · 0.95 pts / game - Barrow
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cambridge United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Barrow - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cambridge United
Barrow
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Cambridge United | Liga | Barrow | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.18 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.66 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 34% | 48% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 27% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 66% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 78% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cambridge United's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Barrow. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cambridge United vs Barrow?
The EFL League Two match finished Cambridge United 3:0 Barrow. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cambridge United vs Barrow?
Cambridge United score 1.43 goals per game on average and Barrow 1.00. The EFL League Two average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Cambridge United's matches and 57% of Barrow's.
What form are Cambridge United and Barrow in?
Over the last 5 games Cambridge United have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Barrow 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambridge United vs Barrow?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


