Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town: match statistics
Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cambridge United played against Huddersfield Town in EFL League One (England). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Abbey Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Cambridge United has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Huddersfield Town has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Cambridge United scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.50. Huddersfield Town scores 2.00 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Cambridge United's games and 50% of Huddersfield Town's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cambridge United has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.49 per game. Cambridge United takes 12.5 shots per game, while Huddersfield Town takes 14.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Cambridge United leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Huddersfield Town leads at halftime in 100% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cambridge United's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Huddersfield Town, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Huddersfield Town sit higher in the table, in 2nd place compared with Cambridge’s 6th, and have collected 11 points from their last five matches thanks to 3 wins and 2 draws. The visitors have been significantly more effective during this run, scoring 12 goals and conceding just 3, while Cambridge have scored 6 and allowed 4. Huddersfield also create more chances: away from home, they average 18 shots and 8 on target, compared with 16 and 6 for the hosts, while their average xG stands at 1.91 versus Cambridge’s 1.78. Cambridge won their only home match so far 3:2, but conceded 2 goals and allowed their opponents an xG of 1.80, which increases the visitors’ chances given Huddersfield’s attacking potential. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Huddersfield drew their only league away fixture, but a more stable defense and stronger current form point towards a narrow victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is supported by both teams’ recent form: in their last 5 matches, Cambridge United and Huddersfield Town have both seen this outcome in 60% of games, compared with a league average of 71%. Huddersfield have scored 2.4 goals per match over this period, while Cambridge have averaged 1.2, so the visitors should pose a clear attacking threat, although the hosts also have offensive arguments in their favor. The average xG from the last five appearances is very similar: 1.58 for Cambridge and 1.56 for Huddersfield, while both defenses have allowed opponents 1.48 and 1.07 xG, respectively. The season data is less conclusive, as Cambridge have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches so far, but Huddersfield average 18 shots and 8 on target per game, compared with 10 and 3 for the hosts. The visitors’ attacking edge and Cambridge’s consistent recent scoring potential marginally support BTTS - Yes, with a goal expected from both teams.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Huddersfield have averaged 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches, while Cambridge have conceded 0.8 goals per game over the same period. Both teams create a solid number of chances: their five-match average xG stands at 1.58 for Cambridge and 1.56 for Huddersfield, supporting a projection of 2.70 total goals. In 100% of both teams’ matches so far, at least 2 goals have been scored, although the season sample is very small, so extreme percentages should not be overvalued. The last five matches produced Over 2.5 goals in 40% of Cambridge’s games and 60% of Huddersfield’s, meaning the 2.5 line remains finely balanced. The strongest signal is Over 1.5, as the visitors’ attacking form and combined xG potential clearly point towards at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Recent form clearly favors Huddersfield: the visitors average 2.4 goals scored and 0.6 conceded per match, compared with Cambridge’s 1.2 and 0.8 respectively. Huddersfield have been leading at the break in 100% of their last five matches and have averaged 1.25 goals before half-time, while Cambridge have been level at this stage in 80% of their games and managed just 0.4 goals. The visitors’ attacking strength is further demonstrated by averages of 18 shots, 8 shots on target and an xG of 1.91, compared with 10 shots, 3 on target and an xG of 1.06 for the hosts. A draw at half-time remains a realistic scenario, given that both teams have kept a clean sheet in the first half in 100% of their last five matches, but Huddersfield’s superior quality favors a turnaround after the break. The visitors average 1.0 goal after half-time, while Cambridge concede 0.8 during that period, making X/2 the most likely HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cambridge United | Huddersfield Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Huddersfield Town is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Cambridge United · 0.5 goals / game - Huddersfield Town
Cambridge United scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Huddersfield Town keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).
Huddersfield Town scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cambridge United
Over / Under - Huddersfield Town
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Huddersfield Town is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Cambridge United · 3 pts / game - Huddersfield Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cambridge United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Huddersfield Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 0% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cambridge United
Huddersfield Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Cambridge United | Liga | Huddersfield Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.50 | 2.58 | • 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 50% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town?
The EFL League One match finished Cambridge United 1:2 Huddersfield Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town?
Cambridge United score 2.00 goals per game on average and Huddersfield Town 2.00. The EFL League One average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Cambridge United's matches and 50% of Huddersfield Town's.
What form are Cambridge United and Huddersfield Town in?
Over the last 5 games Cambridge United have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Huddersfield Town 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


