England - EFL League OneAbbey StadiumData current as of October 23, 2026

Cambridge United vs Reading: match statistics

Cambridge United crest
Cambridge United
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Reading crest
Reading

Cambridge United vs Reading: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cambridge United played against Reading in EFL League One (England). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Abbey Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Cambridge United has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Reading has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.75 points per game.

Scoring records

Cambridge United scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.60. Reading scores 2.75 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 3.16 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Cambridge United's games and 50% of Reading's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 75%, compared with league averages of 66% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Reading has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.32 per game. Cambridge United takes 10.6 shots per game, while Reading takes 17.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Cambridge United leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Reading leads at halftime in 75% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cambridge United's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Reading, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League One games average 3.16 goals. Both teams score in 66% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Reading are unbeaten in their last five matches, earning 11 points from 3 wins and 2 draws, while Cambridge have collected just 5 points. The visitors have scored 12 goals and conceded only 2 during this period, compared with the hosts’ record of 6 goals scored and 7 conceded. Reading also have a clear advantage in terms of away-game control, averaging 63% possession compared with Cambridge’s 42% at home, while their average xG against stands at just 0.77 versus the hosts’ 1.34. On the other hand, Reading’s away data covers only a 0:0 draw and shows 100% of matches without scoring, making a draw a very realistic outcome. However, the better current form, recent attacking output and tighter defense marginally favor an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal for BTTS - No does not primarily come from Reading’s highly solid away defense: the visitors have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their away matches and have yet to concede a goal. Cambridge do average 3.67 goals at home, generate 1.91 xG and have scored in every home game, but they will face a Reading defense whose away xG against is just 0.77. There is also a risk of the visitors failing to score, as their away scoring average is 0.00 and they have failed to score in 100% of such matches. Reading’s recent form is better, having scored 12 goals in their last five games, or 2.4 per match, so a Goal/Goal scenario cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, the combination of Reading’s away clean sheets and their lack of attacking effectiveness on the road slightly favors the outcome in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The last five matches for both teams point to a game with goal-scoring potential: Cambridge averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Reading scored as many as 2.4 goals per game and conceded just 0.4. Reading have won their last three matches, scoring 12 goals across their five most recent outings, while Cambridge conceded 7 during that period. For both teams, 3 of their last 5 matches ended with at least three goals, while the league-wide average is a high 3.17 goals per match. The xG from the last five matches suggests approximately 1.19 for Cambridge and 1.61 for Reading, supporting a projection of 2.75 total goals. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as just two goals are needed for it to land, while Reading’s current attacking form and the hosts’ unstable defense clearly increase the likelihood of this outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Reading are showing clearly superior current form: over their last 5 matches, they have averaged 2.4 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded, remaining unbeaten and winning 60% of those fixtures. The visitors took a lead at the break in 60% of these appearances, scored an average of 1.2 goals before half-time, and did not concede a single first-half goal. Over the same period, Cambridge scored just 0.2 goals before the break, failed to score in 80% of their matches, and recorded only one win in 5 games. Although the hosts have very strong figures from a small home sample, their recent form and Reading’s superiority at both ends of the pitch point primarily to an HT/FT scenario in which the visitors lead at the break and go on to win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
Cambridge UnitedReading
11Shots19
Cambridge UnitedReading
5Shots on target4
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.42xG1.86
Cambridge UnitedReading
7Corners3
Cambridge UnitedReading
51Dangerous attacks53
Cambridge UnitedReading
8Fouls11
Cambridge UnitedReading
2Cards1
Cambridge UnitedReading

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Cambridge UnitedReading
1.8Goals scored / game2.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.6Goals allowed / game1.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
45%Average possession48%
Cambridge UnitedReading
4.2Shots on target / game5.25
Cambridge UnitedReading

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.6Shots per game17
Cambridge UnitedReading
4.2Shots on target5.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
17%Shot conversion16.2%
Cambridge UnitedReading
45%Possession48%
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.32xG for1.74
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.47xG against1.08
Cambridge UnitedReading

Shooting quality

Cambridge United: Counter-attackingReading: Attacking
Cambridge UnitedReading
Accuracy (shots on target)40%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.52

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Reading is 9% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Cambridge United · 1.75 pts / game - Reading

Cambridge United
WDLWD
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Reading
LDWW
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Reading is 53% better for: goals scored per game.

1.8 goals / game - Cambridge United · 2.75 goals / game - Reading

Reading is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.6 goals / game - Cambridge United · 1.25 goals / game - Reading

Cambridge United scoring profile: very strong

Cambridge United scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 games).

9Goals scored (season)11
Cambridge UnitedReading
8Goals conceded (season)5
Cambridge UnitedReading
3.4Average goals per game4
Cambridge UnitedReading
9Goals scored (last 5)11
Cambridge UnitedReading
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Cambridge UnitedReading

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%2 goals75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
20%3 goals75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%4 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%2 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%3 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%4 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Cambridge UnitedReading
40%Scored in both halves50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
100%BTTS - last 550%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / game - Cambridge United · 2.5 pts / game - Reading

Cambridge United - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing
Reading - half-time state
75% leading25% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per game (1st half)2.5
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.6Goals scored (1st half)1.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.8Average goals (1st half)2
Cambridge UnitedReading
80%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%No goal before half-time25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)1
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Cambridge UnitedReading
2.6Average goals (2nd half)2
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%No goal after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Cambridge United - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+1.2

Allows 1.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Reading - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
10
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 50%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cambridge United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.21.4
Average goals per game0.82.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Reading - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.501.75
Goals scored / game1.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.31.0
Average goals per game2.02.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%75%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 75% leading - 25% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cambridge United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Reading
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
5
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.70
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cambridge United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
183%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Cambridge UnitedLigaReading
Average goals per game▲ 3.403.16▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%66%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 80%61%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▼ 0%20%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%68%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%84%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per game
66%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / game
1.50
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ReadingGoalJack Marriott
  2. Cambridge UnitedGoalLiam BennettAssist: Callum Perry
  3. Cambridge UnitedGoalKelland WattsAssist: Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu
  4. Cambridge UnitedYellow cardGassan Ahadme Yahyai
  5. Cambridge UnitedYellow cardCallum Perry
  6. ReadingYellow cardRandell Williams
  7. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Louis AppereOff: Benjamin Leo Knight

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Cambridge United vs Reading?

The EFL League One match finished Cambridge United 2:1 Reading. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambridge United vs Reading?

Cambridge United score 1.80 goals per game on average and Reading 2.75. The EFL League One average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Cambridge United's matches and 50% of Reading's.

What form are Cambridge United and Reading in?

Over the last 5 games Cambridge United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Reading 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambridge United vs Reading?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.