Netherlands - EredivisieKooi StadionData current as of September 15, 2026

Cambuur vs NEC: match statistics

Cambuur crest
Cambuur
3 : 0half-time 1:0
NEC crest
NEC

Cambuur vs NEC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cambuur played against NEC in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Kooi Stadion. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Cambuur has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. NEC has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Cambuur scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 3.60. NEC scores 2.20 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 3.94 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 80% of Cambuur's games and 100% of NEC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 77% for BTTS and 79% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

NEC has the higher season xG average, 1.82 to 1.22 per game. Cambuur takes 11.6 shots per game, while NEC takes 15.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Cambuur leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. NEC leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cambuur's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For NEC, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Eredivisie games average 3.94 goals. Both teams score in 77% of games, and 79% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

NEC have a clear quality advantage away from home: they have won both matches played so far, averaging 3.5 goals scored and avoiding defeat in either game. Cambuur have lost all three of their home fixtures, conceding as many as 4.33 goals per match and posting a -10 goal difference. The visitors create significantly more, averaging 14.5 shots and 7 on target compared with 10.33 and 3 respectively for the hosts, while their xG stands at 1.73 versus Cambuur’s 0.97. NEC’s defense limits opponents to 0.87 xG, whereas Cambuur allow 1.96, further supporting the scenario of numerous chances for the visitors. The hosts’ five-match winless run, during which they have conceded 18 goals, points towards a NEC victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is very strong: Cambuur and NEC have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, and neither team has kept a clean sheet. Cambuur concede an average of 2.5 goals per match, while NEC score as many as 3.5, so the visitors should consistently create chances against the hosts’ weak defense. The home side score only 1.0 goal on average, but generate a high 2.10 xG and register 19.5 shots per match, which supports their chances of scoring at least once. In their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, with Cambuur conceding an average of 3.6 goals and NEC 2.2. Additionally, the league has a BTTS rate of 78% and averages 4.05 goals per match, making the scenario in which both sides score more likely. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 result or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

This match has a clear goal-scoring profile: both teams exceeded 1.5 goals in 100% of their league matches so far, while Over 2.5 goals also landed in every one of them. In their last five appearances, Cambuur conceded as many as 3.6 goals per game, while NEC scored 1.8, strongly supporting a high-scoring projection for the visitors. Cambuur averaged 1.2 goals scored in their last five matches, while NEC allowed opponents 2.2 goals over the same period, meaning the hosts should also contribute to the total. Additionally, the league average stands at 4.05 goals, and both teams’ matches saw both sides score in 80% of their last five fixtures. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the 3.50-goal projection provides a substantial safety margin even if finishing efficiency is lower.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is NEC leading at half-time and the visitors winning, as NEC have won 100% of their away matches so far, averaging 3.5 goals scored and conceding just 1.0 per game. Cambuur have not won at home, average 0 points per match, and have a goal record of just 1.0 scored compared with 2.5 conceded. NEC’s advantage before the break is particularly pronounced: the visitors were leading at half-time in 100% of their away matches, while Cambuur have never led and have failed to score in the first halves. In their last five matches, Cambuur were trailing at half-time in 80% of cases, averaging 0.2 goals scored and conceding as many as 2.2 in that period. NEC average 7 shots on target compared with Cambuur’s 3 and have a 24% finishing rate versus the hosts’ 5%, further supporting the forecast of an early lead and its preservation until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
CambuurNEC
16Shots10
CambuurNEC
7Shots on target1
CambuurNEC
1.75xG1.02
CambuurNEC
4Corners5
CambuurNEC
34Dangerous attacks43
CambuurNEC
16Fouls18
CambuurNEC
2Cards4
CambuurNEC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.2Goals scored / game2.2
CambuurNEC
3.6Goals allowed / game1.8
CambuurNEC
50%Average possession64%
CambuurNEC
3.8Shots on target / game4.6
CambuurNEC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.6Shots per game15.8
CambuurNEC
3.8Shots on target4.6
CambuurNEC
10.3%Shot conversion13.9%
CambuurNEC
50%Possession64%
CambuurNEC
1.22xG for1.82
CambuurNEC
1.76xG against1.08
CambuurNEC

Shooting quality

Cambuur: BalancedNEC: Dominant
CambuurNEC
Accuracy (shots on target)33%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

NEC is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - Cambuur · 1.4 pts / game - NEC

Cambuur
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W20% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 at home
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
NEC
LWWLD
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NEC is 83% better for: goals scored per game.

1.2 goals / game - Cambuur · 2.2 goals / game - NEC

NEC is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

3.6 goals / game - Cambuur · 1.8 goals / game - NEC

Cambuur scoring profile: very strong

Cambuur scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while Cambuur keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).

6Goals scored (season)11
CambuurNEC
18Goals conceded (season)9
CambuurNEC
4.8Average goals per game4
CambuurNEC
6Goals scored (last 5)11
CambuurNEC
18Goals conceded (last 5)9
CambuurNEC

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
CambuurNEC
40%2 goals60%
CambuurNEC
0%3 goals40%
CambuurNEC
0%4 goals20%
CambuurNEC

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
CambuurNEC
100%2 goals60%
CambuurNEC
80%3 goals20%
CambuurNEC
60%4 goals0%
CambuurNEC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time40%
CambuurNEC
0%BTTS in both halves20%
CambuurNEC
0%Scored in both halves60%
CambuurNEC

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
CambuurNEC
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CambuurNEC
80%BTTS - last 5100%
CambuurNEC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
CambuurNEC
80%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
CambuurNEC
60%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
CambuurNEC

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
CambuurNEC
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
CambuurNEC
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
CambuurNEC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NEC is 700% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.2 pts / game - Cambuur · 1.6 pts / game - NEC

Cambuur - half-time state
0% leading20% draw80% trailing
NEC - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.2Points per game (1st half)1.6
CambuurNEC
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.8
CambuurNEC
2.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
CambuurNEC
2.4Average goals (1st half)1.6
CambuurNEC
20%Clean sheet before half-time40%
CambuurNEC
80%No goal before half-time40%
CambuurNEC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per game (2nd half)2
CambuurNEC
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
CambuurNEC
1.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
CambuurNEC
2.4Average goals (2nd half)2.4
CambuurNEC
0%Clean sheet after half-time40%
CambuurNEC
40%No goal after half-time0%
CambuurNEC

Cambuur - second-half results

20% W20% D60% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.20
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.8

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

NEC - second-half results

60% W20% D20% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cambuur - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.80
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game2.21.4
Average goals per game2.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
NEC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game0.81.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cambuur
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
0
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

NEC
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

4.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 2.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
90%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cambuur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
157%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

CambuurLigaNEC
Average goals per game 4.803.94 4.00
Both teams scored 80%77% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%79% 100%
Clean sheets 0%11% 0%
Goal before half-time 80%79% 80%
Goal after half-time 100%96% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.94
Average goals per game
77%
Both teams scored
79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
11%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
2.29
Away goals / game
+-28%
Home attack advantage
+-39%
Home defensive advantage
+-23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
96%
1 goal
73%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CambuurGoalIlyes HamacheAssist: Billy van Duijl
  2. CambuurYellow cardDevid Eugene Bouah
  3. NECYellow cardTobias Storm
  4. NECYellow cardPhilippe Sandler
  5. CambuurGoalIlyes HamacheAssist: Fabian Kvam
  6. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Jamal AmofaOff: Mathieu Maertens
  7. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Sami BouhoudaneOff: Nicolas Binder
  8. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Iwan HenstraOff: Fabian Kvam
  9. NECSubstitutionOn: Kevin KersOff: Emre Mor
  10. NECYellow cardNoé Lebreton
  11. CambuurGoalIwan HenstraAssist: Jamal Amofa
  12. CambuurYellow cardIwan Henstra

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Cambuur vs NEC?

The Eredivisie match finished Cambuur 3:0 NEC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambuur vs NEC?

Cambuur score 1.20 goals per game on average and NEC 2.20. The Eredivisie average is 3.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 79% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Cambuur's matches and 100% of NEC's.

What form are Cambuur and NEC in?

Over the last 5 games Cambuur have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and NEC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambuur vs NEC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.