Cambuur vs Utrecht II: match statistics
Cambuur is the clear favorite for this meeting, sitting in second place in the table with an impressive record of 19 wins this season. The hosts show excellent home form with a 79% win rate and only 7% of matches without scoring, while their last five home games resulted in four wins and one draw. Utrecht II occupies a distant fourteenth place with a negative away record (50% losses, just 21% wins) and dreadful recent form – zero wins in the last five matches. The difference in offensive quality is significant: Cambuur scores an average of 2.43 goals per home match, while Utrecht II manages only 1.21 goals away and fails to keep a clean sheet in 93% of away fixtures. Given the hosts' advantage in all key statistics and the goal difference (+20 for Cambuur in home matches against -6 for Utrecht II away), a home victory is highly probable.
Cambuur vs Utrecht II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cambuur played against Utrecht II in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on March 8, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Cambuur has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Utrecht II has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Cambuur scores 2.14 goals per game and allows 1.14. Utrecht II scores 1.62 and allows 1.79. Games in this league average 3.23 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Cambuur's games and 69% of Utrecht II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 66%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cambuur has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.65 per game. Cambuur takes 15.0 shots per game, while Utrecht II takes 14.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Cambuur leads at halftime in 46% of its games and scores 1.18 goals per game after halftime. Utrecht II leads at halftime in 31% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cambuur's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). For Utrecht II, it is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eerste Divisie games average 3.23 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cambuur is the clear favorite for this meeting, sitting in second place in the table with an impressive record of 19 wins this season. The hosts show excellent home form with a 79% win rate and only 7% of matches without scoring, while their last five home games resulted in four wins and one draw. Utrecht II occupies a distant fourteenth place with a negative away record (50% losses, just 21% wins) and dreadful recent form – zero wins in the last five matches. The difference in offensive quality is significant: Cambuur scores an average of 2.43 goals per home match, while Utrecht II manages only 1.21 goals away and fails to keep a clean sheet in 93% of away fixtures. Given the hosts' advantage in all key statistics and the goal difference (+20 for Cambuur in home matches against -6 for Utrecht II away), a home victory is highly probable.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cambuur | Utrecht II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cambuur is 550% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Cambuur · 0.4 pts / game - Utrecht II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cambuur is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
2.14 goals / game - Cambuur · 1.62 goals / game - Utrecht II
Cambuur is 57% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.14 goals / game - Cambuur · 1.79 goals / game - Utrecht II
Cambuur scores in 93% of games (26 of 28 meczów), while Utrecht II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 meczów).
Utrecht II scores in 76% of games (22 of 29 meczów), while Cambuur keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cambuur
Over / Under - Utrecht II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cambuur is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.68 pts / game - Cambuur · 1.21 pts / game - Utrecht II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cambuur - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 68%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Utrecht II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 28%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cambuur
Utrecht II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| Cambuur | Liga | Utrecht II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.29 | 3.23 | ▲ 3.41 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 63% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 61% | 64% | ▲ 66% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 77% | • 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 86% | • 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Cambuur's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Utrecht II. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cambuur vs Utrecht II?
The Eerste Divisie match finished Cambuur 1:0 Utrecht II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cambuur vs Utrecht II?
Cambuur score 2.14 goals per game on average and Utrecht II 1.62. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Cambuur's matches and 69% of Utrecht II's.
What form are Cambuur and Utrecht II in?
Over the last 5 games Cambuur have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Utrecht II 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambuur vs Utrecht II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


