Wales - Welsh Premier LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Cardiff MU vs Bala Town: match statistics

Cardiff MU crest
Cardiff MU
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Bala Town crest
Bala Town
135%(1.90)
X35%(3.35)
230%(3.75)

Cardiff MU occupies a higher league position (7th) than Bala Town (10th), however both teams are in very similar and concerning form - each has earned only 1 point per game over their last 5 matches. The hosts have poor home efficiency (21% wins, 43% losses) and a high average of goals conceded (1.86), which does not give them a decisive advantage. Bala Town performs poorly away from home (29% wins, 64% losses), but Cardiff also fails to impress with their home form, carrying a 'ddlll' streak in their recent home fixtures. An identical goal difference for both teams (-10) along with similar xG metrics suggest a closely contested match. Considering Cardiff's high number of draws this season (13) and the recent form of both sides, a share of the points appears to be the most probable outcome, although the hosts hold a slight advantage due to playing at home.

Cardiff MU vs Bala Town: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cardiff MU played against Bala Town in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Cardiff MU has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Bala Town has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Cardiff MU scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 1.55. Bala Town scores 0.90 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.91 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 66% of Cardiff MU's games and 38% of Bala Town's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 38%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cardiff MU has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.09 per game. Cardiff MU takes 10.7 shots per game, while Bala Town takes 8.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Cardiff MU leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Bala Town leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.41 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cardiff MU's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). For Bala Town, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Welsh Premier League games average 2.91 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cardiff MU occupies a higher league position (7th) than Bala Town (10th), however both teams are in very similar and concerning form - each has earned only 1 point per game over their last 5 matches. The hosts have poor home efficiency (21% wins, 43% losses) and a high average of goals conceded (1.86), which does not give them a decisive advantage. Bala Town performs poorly away from home (29% wins, 64% losses), but Cardiff also fails to impress with their home form, carrying a 'ddlll' streak in their recent home fixtures. An identical goal difference for both teams (-10) along with similar xG metrics suggest a closely contested match. Considering Cardiff's high number of draws this season (13) and the recent form of both sides, a share of the points appears to be the most probable outcome, although the hosts hold a slight advantage due to playing at home.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators are low (Cardiff MU 40%, Bala Town 36%) and significantly below the league average (51%), favoring a no-goal scenario for one team. Both sides also have high percentages of matches without scoring (FTS: 40% and 43%) and low average goals scored (0.87 and 0.93), limiting the chances of both teams scoring. Cardiff MU keeps a clean sheet relatively often (40%), and Bala Town, despite a weaker defense (1.64 conceded/2.0 xGA), generates only moderate offense themselves (1.06 xG) and has averaged 0.6 goals scored in their last 5 matches. The trend from the last 5 games (BTTS: 60% vs 40%) is not sufficiently consistent, and the total goals from recent runs (4 and 3) confirm finishing issues. The most probable outcome is a match where at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal comes from the 3.5 line: Cardiff MU have 73% of matches Under 3.5, and Bala Town 79%, with simultaneously very low Over 4.5 (7% and 0%). The goal profiles of both teams are rather 'low' (average goals scored: 0.87 and 0.93), and in the last 5 matches, they scored only 1.4 goals per match combined (0.8 and 0.6). The xG model suggests a moderate number of chances, but without excessive 'surplus' for goals (xG_for 1.11/1.06 against xG_against 1.57/1.97), which gives approximately 2.55 expected goals in the match. Additionally, low BTTS (40% and 36%) and a high percentage of matches with at most 3 goals support a scenario without a scoreline like 3:2 or 4:0. Therefore, the best choice is Under 3.5 as the most probable and market-stable variant.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to a draw at half-time, as both teams often reach HT with an X result (Cardiff 33%, Bala 43%), and in Cardiff's last 5 matches, as many as 60% of them were level at the break with a very low average goals per first half (0.4). Bala also has a high first-half clean sheet percentage (79%) and 64% of clean sheets at HT, favoring a 0-0 or 1-1 scenario at half-time. After the break, Cardiff's advantage grows, as Bala has a weak defense this season (1.64 goals conceded per match, xGA 1.97) and a very high overall loss rate (64%). Additionally, Bala loses more often in second halves (56%) and concedes an average of 1.07 goals, increasing the chances that if the score is level at half-time, the home side will 'push on' to secure a win. Overall, the match profile suggests a cautious start and a higher probability of the balance tipping in Cardiff's favor late on.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
Cardiff MUBala Town
13Shots13
Cardiff MUBala Town
6Shots on target4
Cardiff MUBala Town
1.81xG1.43
Cardiff MUBala Town
7Corners4
Cardiff MUBala Town
79Dangerous attacks46
Cardiff MUBala Town
4Fouls11
Cardiff MUBala Town
0Cards3
Cardiff MUBala Town

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.31Goals scored / game0.9
Cardiff MUBala Town
1.55Goals allowed / game1.41
Cardiff MUBala Town
47%Average possession41%
Cardiff MUBala Town
3.93Shots on target / game3.24
Cardiff MUBala Town

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.69Shots per game8
Cardiff MUBala Town
3.93Shots on target3.24
Cardiff MUBala Town
12.3%Shot conversion11.2%
Cardiff MUBala Town
47%Possession41%
Cardiff MUBala Town
1.37xG for1.09
Cardiff MUBala Town
1.43xG against1.76
Cardiff MUBala Town

Shooting quality

Cardiff MU: Counter-attackingBala Town: Balanced
Cardiff MUBala Town
Accuracy (shots on target)37%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cardiff MU
DDLLW
Season result split
24% W45% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-13-9
1.17 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-6
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Bala Town
LLDDW
Season result split
24% W28% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-14
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cardiff MU is 46% better for: goals scored per game.

1.31 goals / game - Cardiff MU · 0.9 goals / game - Bala Town

Bala Town is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.55 goals / game - Cardiff MU · 1.41 goals / game - Bala Town

Cardiff MU scoring profile: strong

Cardiff MU scores in 72% of games (21 of 29 meczów), while Bala Town keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 meczów).

Bala Town scoring profile: very strong

Bala Town scores in 59% of games (17 of 29 meczów), while Cardiff MU keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 meczów).

38Goals scored (season)26
Cardiff MUBala Town
45Goals conceded (season)41
Cardiff MUBala Town
2.86Average goals per game2.31
Cardiff MUBala Town
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Cardiff MUBala Town
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Cardiff MUBala Town

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal59%
Cardiff MUBala Town
41%2 goals17%
Cardiff MUBala Town
14%3 goals10%
Cardiff MUBala Town
3%4 goals3%
Cardiff MUBala Town

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal69%
Cardiff MUBala Town
41%2 goals52%
Cardiff MUBala Town
17%3 goals14%
Cardiff MUBala Town
10%4 goals7%
Cardiff MUBala Town

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time17%
Cardiff MUBala Town
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Cardiff MUBala Town
21%Scored in both halves14%
Cardiff MUBala Town

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
Cardiff MUBala Town
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Cardiff MUBala Town
60%BTTS - last 540%
Cardiff MUBala Town

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Cardiff MUBala Town
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Cardiff MUBala Town
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Cardiff MUBala Town

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Cardiff MUBala Town
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
Cardiff MUBala Town
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Cardiff MUBala Town

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cardiff MU - half-time state
28% leading28% draw45% trailing
Bala Town - half-time state
24% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)1.1
Cardiff MUBala Town
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Cardiff MUBala Town
0.72Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
Cardiff MUBala Town
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.21
Cardiff MUBala Town
48%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Cardiff MUBala Town
62%No goal before half-time59%
Cardiff MUBala Town

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per game (2nd half)0.93
Cardiff MUBala Town
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
Cardiff MUBala Town
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
Cardiff MUBala Town
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.1
Cardiff MUBala Town
48%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Cardiff MUBala Town
45%No goal after half-time69%
Cardiff MUBala Town

Cardiff MU - second-half results

31% W28% R41% P
32
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 24%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Bala Town - second-half results

17% W41% R41% P
32
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Cardiff MU - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.41.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Bala Town - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cardiff MU
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
5
8
16-30
5
6
31-45
11
7
46-60
4
6
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Bala Town
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
3
11
16-30
5
5
31-45
6
8
46-60
4
8
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cardiff MU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Bala Town

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).

Teams vs league

Cardiff MULigaBala Town
Average goals per game 2.862.91 2.31
Both teams scored 66%51% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%55% 38%
Clean sheets 14%29% 31%
Goal before half-time 76%73% 69%
Goal after half-time 83%76% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.41
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Bala TownGoalCameron Ferguson
  2. Bala TownYellow cardLiam Higgins
  3. Bala TownYellow cardHarry Dean
  4. Cardiff MUGoalJasper Payne
  5. Bala TownYellow cardCameron Ferguson
  6. Cardiff MUGoalLifumpa Mwandwe
  7. Cardiff MUSubstitutionOn: H MatthewsOff: Adam Roscrow

Head-to-head

Record from Cardiff MU's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against Bala Town. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Cardiff MU vs Bala Town?

The Welsh Premier League match finished Cardiff MU 2:1 Bala Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cardiff MU and Bala Town?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cardiff MU won 1, Bala Town won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cardiff MU vs Bala Town?

Cardiff MU score 1.31 goals per game on average and Bala Town 0.90. The Welsh Premier League average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 66% of Cardiff MU's matches and 38% of Bala Town's.

What form are Cardiff MU and Bala Town in?

Over the last 5 games Cardiff MU have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Bala Town 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cardiff MU vs Bala Town?

The statistical background for Cardiff MU vs Bala Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.