United States - MLS Next ProData current as of September 07, 2026

Carolina Core vs Chattanooga FC: match statistics

Carolina Core crest
Carolina Core
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Chattanooga FC crest
Chattanooga FC

Carolina Core vs Chattanooga FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Carolina Core played against Chattanooga FC in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on July 12, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Carolina Core has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Chattanooga FC has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Carolina Core scores 1.17 goals per game and allows 1.72. Chattanooga FC scores 1.94 and allows 1.65. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Carolina Core's games and 65% of Chattanooga FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 65%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chattanooga FC has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.44 per game. Carolina Core takes 12.3 shots per game, while Chattanooga FC takes 13.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Carolina Core leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. Chattanooga FC leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.94 after halftime.

When the teams score

Carolina Core's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Chattanooga FC, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match looks balanced: Chattanooga FC have superior season metrics (8 wins and 33 goals) versus Carolina Core (3 wins and 21 goals), and in their last 5 matches the visitors scored 12 goals and are unbeaten (2 wins, 3 draws), translating to an average of 1.8 points per game versus 1.4 for the home side. Carolina Core benefit from home stability: at home they score 1.5 goals on average, concede 1.25 per match, have xG for 1.63 and xG against 1.63 and 0% of matches without scoring, while Chattanooga concede 2.13 goals on average away and have recorded no clean sheets. However, the visitors generate more high-quality chances: on average 5 shots on target per game versus 4.75 for the hosts, a better conversion rate of 15% compared to Carolina’s 11% and on average 1.88 goals away versus 1.5 for the hosts. Additionally, Carolina have scored 6 goals in their last 5 matches with 2 losses, while Chattanooga have 12 goals and 0 losses, which shows the visitors’ attacking advantage despite their defensive issues away. As a result I rate a draw as the most probable outcome and estimate the probability distribution at approximately 30% for Carolina Core, 40% for a draw and 30% for Chattanooga FC.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The primary signal for BTTS - Yes is that Chattanooga has BTTS in 88% of their away matches, while Carolina have BTTS at home in 44% of games, producing a strong asymmetric impulse favoring both teams to score. Additionally, Chattanooga have kept 0% clean sheets on the road and in their last 5 matches have averaged 2.4 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, whereas Carolina in their last 5 have averaged 1.2 scored and 1.2 conceded. Season averages confirm both sides generate goals: Carolina score 2.0 and concede 1.22 per game, Chattanooga score 1.88 and concede 2.13, and the league shows BTTS at 62% with an average of 3.27 goals per match. xG comparison shows Carolina xG 1.77 vs Chattanooga xG against 1.64, and Chattanooga xG 1.50 vs Carolina xG against 1.36, meaning both teams create more chances than opponents usually allow. Given Chattanooga’s 88% away BTTS, the absence of away clean sheets and positive xG on both sides, I select "yes" as the strongest signal with an estimated probability of about 72% vs 28%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects 1.71 xG for Carolina Core (average of 1.77 attacking xG for hosts and 1.64 xG allowed by Chattanooga) and 1.43 xG for Chattanooga (average of 1.50 attacking xG for visitors and 1.36 xG allowed by Carolina), totaling 3.14 expected goals. Season-long metrics support a goals-prone fixture: Carolina has 78% of matches over 1.5, Chattanooga 88%, while over 2.5 rates are 56% (Carolina) and 75% (Chattanooga) versus a league average of 66%. Both teams create chances (Carolina 14.33 shots and 6.0 on target; Chattanooga 12.63 shots and 5.0 on target) with conversion rates of 14% and 15%, and in 44%/88% of matches both sides have scored, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (estimated probability ~82%), as the 3.14 expected goals and high season figures of 78%/88% indicate a strong chance of a minimum of 2 goals. Over 2.5 is the second choice (estimated 66%), while Over 3.5 remains less certain (~38%) despite hosts recording 56% of matches over 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Carolina Core are the favorites: they win 67% of matches and average 2.0 goals per match versus Chattanooga, who have a 25% win rate and 1.88 goals on average, which favors the home side over 90 minutes. At half-time Carolina led in 44% of fixtures and score an average of 0.89 goals while conceding just 0.33, and they kept a clean sheet at the break in 78% of games, so the home advantage in the first half is clear. The hosts’ xG is 1.77 compared to the visitors’ 1.50, and a higher shots-on-target average (6.0 to 5.0) confirms better quality chances for Carolina, increasing the probability of maintaining the lead and securing the win. At the same time Chattanooga average 1.13 goals by half-time and have an away-season both-teams-to-score rate of 88%, so there is a real risk of a visiting goal in the second half and some probability mass shifts to turnaround scenarios. Considering the lead-at-the-break advantage (44%) and the hosts’ overall match-winning edge (67% wins), the strongest signal is 1/1, therefore I rate 1/1 as the best pick (32%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
8Shots16
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
5Shots on target6
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
1.28xG1.94
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
3Corners7
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
58Dangerous attacks72
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
15Fouls20
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
1Cards1
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
1.17Goals scored / game1.94
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
1.72Goals allowed / game1.65
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
46%Average possession46%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
4.22Shots on target / game5.53
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.28Shots per game13.53
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
4.22Shots on target5.53
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
9.5%Shot conversion14.3%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
46%Possession46%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
1.44xG for1.64
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
1.7xG against1.49
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

Shooting quality

Carolina Core: BalancedChattanooga FC: Counter-attacking
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
Accuracy (shots on target)34%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chattanooga FC is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Carolina Core · 1.8 pts / game - Chattanooga FC

Carolina Core
WLDWL
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-9
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Chattanooga FC
WDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
47% W24% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-5
1.65 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga FC is 66% better for: goals scored per game.

1.17 goals / game - Carolina Core · 1.94 goals / game - Chattanooga FC

Carolina Core scoring profile: very strong

Carolina Core scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 meczów), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 meczów).

Chattanooga FC scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga FC scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 meczów), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)33
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
31Goals conceded (season)28
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
2.89Average goals per game3.59
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
6Goals scored (last 5)12
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal88%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
39%2 goals59%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
0%3 goals29%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
0%4 goals18%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal76%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
56%2 goals47%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
33%3 goals18%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
6%4 goals18%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time29%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
17%Scored in both halves35%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS59%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga FC is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Carolina Core · 1.59 pts / game - Chattanooga FC

Carolina Core - half-time state
22% leading33% draw44% trailing
Chattanooga FC - half-time state
41% leading35% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.59
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
0.44Goals scored (1st half)1
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.53
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
33%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
61%No goal before half-time41%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per game (2nd half)1.41
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.12
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
1.56Average goals (2nd half)2.06
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
50%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC
44%No goal after half-time35%
Carolina CoreChattanooga FC

Carolina Core - second-half results

28% W44% R28% P
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding77%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Chattanooga FC - second-half results

41% W18% R41% P
27
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Carolina Core - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chattanooga FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.40
Goals scored / game1.21.2
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game1.42.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+50
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Carolina Core
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
6
16-30
6
6
31-45
7
4
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Chattanooga FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
3
31-45
7
7
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.24
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Carolina Core

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Chattanooga FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Carolina CoreLigaChattanooga FC
Average goals per game 2.893.24 3.59
Both teams scored 67%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%66% 65%
Clean sheets 22%22% 24%
Goal before half-time 83%75% 71%
Goal after half-time 78%84% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / game
1.41
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Carolina CoreYellow cardRicardo Montenegro
  2. Chattanooga FCGoalAlexander Ian KrehlAssist: Anthony Sorenson
  3. Chattanooga FCYellow cardSteeve Louis Jean
  4. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Isaiah JonesOff: Steeve Louis Jean
  5. Carolina CoreGoalArnaud Tattevin
  6. Carolina CoreSubstitutionOn: Rashid TettehOff: David Diaz
  7. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Luke HusakiwskyOff: Alex McGrath

Head-to-head

Record from Carolina Core's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses against Chattanooga FC. Games average 1.75 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.

Chattanooga FC
1 : 0
Carolina Core
Chattanooga FC
0 : 0
Carolina Core FC
Carolina Core FC
0 : 1
Chattanooga FC
Carolina Core FC
1 : 4
Chattanooga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Carolina Core vs Chattanooga FC?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Carolina Core 1:1 Chattanooga FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Carolina Core and Chattanooga FC?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Carolina Core won 0, Chattanooga FC won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Carolina Core vs Chattanooga FC?

Carolina Core score 1.17 goals per game on average and Chattanooga FC 1.94. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Carolina Core's matches and 65% of Chattanooga FC's.

What form are Carolina Core and Chattanooga FC in?

Over the last 5 games Carolina Core have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chattanooga FC 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Carolina Core vs Chattanooga FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.