Cavese vs Audace Cerignola: match statistics
Audace Cerignola displays clearly superior form and efficiency this season. The visitors hold a 43% win rate away with only 29% losses, while Cavese wins just 29% of home matches and loses 36%. Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors – Audace earned 2.0 points per match (3 wins) compared to 1.2 points for Cavese (only 1 win). Cavese fails to score in 29% of home games, and their home goal difference stands at 0, indicating offensive struggles. Audace Cerignola possesses better xG statistics (1.36 vs 1.42 for Cavese), but most importantly, a significantly higher point efficiency. Taking all statistical data into account, I predict a victory for the visitors, although low xG values and similar possession statistics suggest this could be a close encounter with the possibility of a draw.
Cavese vs Audace Cerignola: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cavese played against Audace Cerignola in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on February 28, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Cavese has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Audace Cerignola has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Cavese scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 1.21. Audace Cerignola scores 1.21 and allows 1.21. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Cavese's games and 46% of Audace Cerignola's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 50%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Audace Cerignola has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.36 per game. Cavese takes 10.7 shots per game, while Audace Cerignola takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Cavese leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Audace Cerignola leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cavese's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Audace Cerignola, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Audace Cerignola displays clearly superior form and efficiency this season. The visitors hold a 43% win rate away with only 29% losses, while Cavese wins just 29% of home matches and loses 36%. Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors – Audace earned 2.0 points per match (3 wins) compared to 1.2 points for Cavese (only 1 win). Cavese fails to score in 29% of home games, and their home goal difference stands at 0, indicating offensive struggles. Audace Cerignola possesses better xG statistics (1.36 vs 1.42 for Cavese), but most importantly, a significantly higher point efficiency. Taking all statistical data into account, I predict a victory for the visitors, although low xG values and similar possession statistics suggest this could be a close encounter with the possibility of a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cavese | Audace Cerignola | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Audace Cerignola is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Cavese · 2 pts / game - Audace Cerignola
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Audace Cerignola is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
0.93 goals / game - Cavese · 1.21 goals / game - Audace Cerignola
Cavese scores in 61% of games (17 of 28 meczów), while Audace Cerignola keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 meczów).
Audace Cerignola scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 meczów), while Cavese keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cavese
Over / Under - Audace Cerignola
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cavese is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Cavese · 1.18 pts / game - Audace Cerignola
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cavese - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Audace Cerignola - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cavese
Audace Cerignola
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Cavese | Liga | Audace Cerignola | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.14 | 2.48 | • 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 49% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 30% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 65% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cavese's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Audace Cerignola. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cavese vs Audace Cerignola?
The Serie C Group C match finished Cavese 2:0 Audace Cerignola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cavese vs Audace Cerignola?
Cavese score 0.93 goals per game on average and Audace Cerignola 1.21. The Serie C Group C average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Cavese's matches and 46% of Audace Cerignola's.
What form are Cavese and Audace Cerignola in?
Over the last 5 games Cavese have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Audace Cerignola 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavese vs Audace Cerignola?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cavese vs Audace Cerignola: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.